Don't take it Personally, Part Deaux

Have you been talking about me again???

Talking, no. Dreaming, why yes, sweety-kins!

does that include when the Big Ten plays football against the SEC??

Sure, but that's fact (the inferiority of the Big Ten), not opinion.

interesting that you assume that I had something to do with it being pulled.

Just because I actually render an opinion does not mean I take dissenting opinions as an attack -

but I will point out when someone who posts a whole thread about dissenting puts up a snarky comment somewhere else and call them out.

I doubt that is what got it pulled.

honestly I have no idea why it got pulled- clearly I have not received any warnings.

Interesting that you thought I was talking about you.

You're right.

But your subsequent responses tend to be on the harsh side.  Whether you recognize it as such or not, you tend to leave little room for anyone to debate or even discuss an issue.  You may not even be aware of it, but you project an image of being above hearing anyone who disagrees with you.

sad but true as this Ohio transplant has reluctantly come to the same conclusion

I was speaking in generalities, based on past experience, ButI  seem to have stirred some folks directly.

brown_dog_us - 2008-02-28 1:49 PM I believe 2008 is the year of the dawg....

Sadly, I have to agree.

If I leave little room for debate that suggests I am arguing my side well - I put up an opinion that the article referenced was not as 'undecided' as the OP thought - and why - simple post.

to which Rick put up a picture of a dead horse being beaten and the author of the original 'don't take it personally' thread replied quoting him with a big HAHAHHA....

so I put a link to her thread and said it struck me as the pot calling the kettle black.

Rick then put up two pics of the pot being stirred - one a kid (his?) with a spoon in the toilet and accusing me of stirring things up.

so exactly where am I projecting that I am above hearing?

oh and since this is all written I would say that PROJECTING is the operative word of your post.....

I am happy to debate an issue, but don't assume that if I do not roll over to your side that it means I don't hear - particularly since on the internet I read

well you specifically mention schooling -

no one is that obtuse 

It was my fault for extolling the virtues of Campy Ergo over Shimano STI ..... I'm sorry all ...

The fact you considered that an 'argument' makes it difficult to have a debate with you.

I think it was the Strength training one, but I'm clueless too. Apparently we missed a good argument, Fred .

Well, that and you failed to listen to the pro-SRAM arguments.

2 tries for a guess on what topic ....... and it wasn't MAF training .........