ChrisM - 2012-06-25 10:35 PM
Well, I come from a swimming background, not a triathlon background, which is exactly why I think it is a bit ridiculous. I've been doing everything the new Garmin does since high school with either my timex wristwatch or the deck clock. Thomas' list was interesting, but that's a 910, and frankly most of those things I am fine at (pacing, stroke count, intervals, reading the clock at night, etc.)
But I know triathletes - including myself - love gadgets. So if you can afford it, and it helps you swim more faster, go for it. Hell, I just ordered a 910 so I can wear it for a full race and get my OW swims without going to gmaps
Chris, I agree with the 'in workout' sentiment that all you need is a pace clock and some brain cells. Even with oen of these gadgets you need to be able to "think on your feet" to ge tthe most from your workouts.
However...I like to record & log my workouts as accurately as possible. While I ended up selling my Swim Sense because it wasn't accurate enough
(dropped laps
) what I used it for was the ease of recording what I had already done.
In otherwords I didn't use it during the workout I just wore it. Afterwards I uploaded it and could go back and evaluate what had been done in the pool. Very much teh same way I use a powermeter, which costs 10x more. Sure I use it during workouts to a degree, but anymore I mostly use it to accurately record training stress and evaluate sessions after the fact. Durign the workouts I'm going by effort & time based parameters, similar to pool training.
Sounds like a great gadget to me if it is more accurate than the swim sense. The wireless function sounds awesome...no plugs or cords to deal with.