General Discussion Triathlon Talk » IOC and transgender athletes Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2016-02-03 3:42 PM
in reply to: mike761

User image


1731
100050010010025
Denver, Colorado
Subject: RE: IOC and transgender athletes
Originally posted by mike761

Originally posted by marysia83

From biological anthropology perspective, men are faster than women because of the skeleton. There is some physics involved, but basically, the whole thing with female hip bones designed to hold pregnancy and give a birth unable us to keep up with a different skeletal structure. I can see how this could be the argument in the male-to-female discussion.


I believe men also have larger lung capacity then women, this will not change with hormone therapy.

So a male on hormone therapy competing as a women still has an advantage right?


I cannot speak about hormonal changes, nor the lungs, I know there is an advantage in skeleton. Generally, you know. All things equal, the best guy will be better than the best woman, because of the skeleton. There are still plenty of women faster than some man, for various reasons. But when you look at any race, you will see first few places being taken by male. There could be more things than just physics and bones, but - as far as I was told from anthropology perspective - skeleton plays the role.


2016-02-04 12:59 PM
in reply to: Left Brain


96
252525
Subject: RE: IOC and transgender athletes
Originally posted by Left Brain

Originally posted by gotbitten one year of hormones just below the what makes you a man level hardly puts you on a fair level with women. what about all the years of extra muscle and extra size that are a result of being a man - it doesnt disappear and suddenly you have a woman's body. you people are putting PC before brains then call everyone idiots. why not do like the athena's and give them their own class? oh thats right, it wouldnt be PC

HAHAHAHA!!!  I'm probably the least PC person you know.  I have references.

Dude, Athena's are big women, not transgender men.  It's a hard concept I know,  maybe find a 10 year old to explain it to you.




your references say that you are indeed PC when it serves you and your beliefs. clearly you reading comprehension is severely lacking NOBODY said big women are transgender men. Maybe you should have a 6 year old explain it to you. Athena's have their own division, Clydesdales have their own division, there is no reason transgender men can also have their own division. Likely a four year old can explain it to you that dropping hormones does not a fair competition make. But go ahead, pretend you can't read when you truly have zero argument without resorting to typical Left Brain behavior. YOU are the biggest reason everyone left BT - Left Brian and his worshipping minions are all that are left.
2016-02-04 1:52 PM
in reply to: 0

User image

Seattle
Subject: RE: IOC and transgender athletes

Originally posted by mike761
Originally posted by marysia83 From biological anthropology perspective, men are faster than women because of the skeleton. There is some physics involved, but basically, the whole thing with female hip bones designed to hold pregnancy and give a birth unable us to keep up with a different skeletal structure. I can see how this could be the argument in the male-to-female discussion.
I believe men also have larger lung capacity then women, this will not change with hormone therapy. So a male on hormone therapy competing as a women still has an advantage right?

I had read up on this a bit too and it sounds as though lung capacity is negligible in terms of advantage. I suppose a lot of what we are talking about is really going to depend on the sport.

As marysia83 said, skeleton does come into play a little more, particularly the hips (again as mentioned) but how much? I'm just not sure. And where would the line be drawn? What if a female just so happens to have a bone structure much more similar to a male? Is everyone going to have to do some bone structure scan and a lung capacity test? 

I would guess that until transgender athletes start dominating that the IOC ICC and IAAF feel there is enough science backing up a pretty level playing field.



Edited by Asalzwed 2016-02-04 1:54 PM
2016-02-04 2:04 PM
in reply to: gotbitten

User image

Seattle
Subject: RE: IOC and transgender athletes

Originally posted by gotbitten
Originally posted by Left Brain

Originally posted by gotbitten one year of hormones just below the what makes you a man level hardly puts you on a fair level with women. what about all the years of extra muscle and extra size that are a result of being a man - it doesnt disappear and suddenly you have a woman's body. you people are putting PC before brains then call everyone idiots. why not do like the athena's and give them their own class? oh thats right, it wouldnt be PC

HAHAHAHA!!!  I'm probably the least PC person you know.  I have references.

Dude, Athena's are big women, not transgender men.  It's a hard concept I know,  maybe find a 10 year old to explain it to you.

 Athena's have their own division, Clydesdales have their own division, there is no reason transgender men can also have their own division. .

Well, we are talking about the IOC which is the International Olympic Committee.

When competing at that level, there are no age groups, clydesdale or athena divisions. You got there because  you are the best at your sport, because you achieved the Olympic standard and because your country chose you to represent them. 

2016-02-04 3:33 PM
in reply to: gotbitten

User image


1300
1000100100100
Subject: RE: IOC and transgender athletes

your references say that you are indeed PC when it serves you and your beliefs. clearly you reading comprehension is severely lacking NOBODY said big women are transgender men. Maybe you should have a 6 year old explain it to you. Athena's have their own division, Clydesdales have their own division, there is no reason transgender men can also have their own division. Likely a four year old can explain it to you that dropping hormones does not a fair competition make. But go ahead, pretend you can't read when you truly have zero argument without resorting to typical Left Brain behavior. YOU are the biggest reason everyone left BT - Left Brian and his worshipping minions are all that are left.

We are talking about the Olympics here, not age group triathlon. 

2016-02-04 3:42 PM
in reply to: 0

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: IOC and transgender athletes

Originally posted by Goggles Pizzano

your references say that you are indeed PC when it serves you and your beliefs. clearly you reading comprehension is severely lacking NOBODY said big women are transgender men. Maybe you should have a 6 year old explain it to you. Athena's have their own division, Clydesdales have their own division, there is no reason transgender men can also have their own division. Likely a four year old can explain it to you that dropping hormones does not a fair competition make. But go ahead, pretend you can't read when you truly have zero argument without resorting to typical Left Brain behavior. YOU are the biggest reason everyone left BT - Left Brian and his worshipping minions are all that are left.

We are talking about the Olympics here, not age group triathlon. 

Yes, and the OLYMPIC rules clearly state.....AND THEY HAVE STATED SINCE 2003, that transgender people can compete against/with people of their own gender.   The ONLY difference is that now transgender people don't have to have a surgery if they don't want to.  NOTHING has changed as far as hormone levels, etc.  For 12 years it's been fine, but now the Olympic committee has decided they can't reasonably require someone to have surgery and it's a big deal.

It's not a matter of competition.......it's a matter of bias.....PERIOD....no matter how carefully crafted the argument is.



Edited by Left Brain 2016-02-04 3:45 PM


2016-02-04 4:47 PM
in reply to: Left Brain

User image


1300
1000100100100
Subject: RE: IOC and transgender athletes
Originally posted by Left Brain

Originally posted by Goggles Pizzano

your references say that you are indeed PC when it serves you and your beliefs. clearly you reading comprehension is severely lacking NOBODY said big women are transgender men. Maybe you should have a 6 year old explain it to you. Athena's have their own division, Clydesdales have their own division, there is no reason transgender men can also have their own division. Likely a four year old can explain it to you that dropping hormones does not a fair competition make. But go ahead, pretend you can't read when you truly have zero argument without resorting to typical Left Brain behavior. YOU are the biggest reason everyone left BT - Left Brian and his worshipping minions are all that are left.

We are talking about the Olympics here, not age group triathlon. 

Yes, and the OLYMPIC rules clearly state.....AND THEY HAVE STATED SINCE 2003, that transgender people can compete against/with people of their own gender.   The ONLY difference is that now transgender people don't have to have a surgery if they don't want to.  NOTHING has changed as far as hormone levels, etc.  For 12 years it's been fine, but now the Olympic committee has decided they can't reasonably require someone to have surgery and it's a big deal.

It's not a matter of competition.......it's a matter of bias.....PERIOD....no matter how carefully crafted the argument is.

Right and I'm pointing out that there's only M - F in the olympics. Not categories like AG triathlon as he's suggesting so his point doesn't make sense????.
2016-02-04 6:11 PM
in reply to: 0

User image


928
50010010010010025
Subject: RE: IOC and transgender athletes
Looks like a misquote to me.

Edited by jennifer_runs 2016-02-04 6:12 PM
2016-02-05 10:03 AM
in reply to: jennifer_runs

User image

Veteran
495
100100100100252525
Calgary
Subject: RE: IOC and transgender athletes
Considering recent rulings I think the question of the universality of testosterone levels as the determining factor is a much bigger issue than gender reassignment surgery. Is it fair for to other women competing against Dutee Chand that she has much higher levels of testosterone? Is it fair to make Dutee Chand take steps to medically reduce high testosterone levels that are the result of a condition she was born with? It gets messy - apparently gender is not binary and it's difficult to come up with a simple rule.

http://www.runnersworld.com/elite-runners/runners-experts-concerned...
2016-02-05 10:35 AM
in reply to: Asalzwed

User image

Member
1748
100050010010025
Exton, PA
Subject: RE: IOC and transgender athletes
Originally posted by Asalzwed

Originally posted by mike761
Originally posted by marysia83 From biological anthropology perspective, men are faster than women because of the skeleton. There is some physics involved, but basically, the whole thing with female hip bones designed to hold pregnancy and give a birth unable us to keep up with a different skeletal structure. I can see how this could be the argument in the male-to-female discussion.
I believe men also have larger lung capacity then women, this will not change with hormone therapy. So a male on hormone therapy competing as a women still has an advantage right?

I had read up on this a bit too and it sounds as though lung capacity is negligible in terms of advantage. I suppose a lot of what we are talking about is really going to depend on the sport.

As marysia83 said, skeleton does come into play a little more, particularly the hips (again as mentioned) but how much? I'm just not sure. And where would the line be drawn? What if a female just so happens to have a bone structure much more similar to a male? Is everyone going to have to do some bone structure scan and a lung capacity test? 

I would guess that until transgender athletes start dominating that the IOC ICC and IAAF feel there is enough science backing up a pretty level playing field.




My line of thought was just that there are more advantages than just the hormones. Although they may be small it could be enough at the elite level to make a transgender athlete dominate as a woman. If it's any advantage at all, could it be enough to step over the line a fraction of a second ahead of the competition?

Not saying right or wrong, just a thought.
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » IOC and transgender athletes Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2
 
 
RELATED POSTS

Transgender Ironman Blog Pages: 1 2

Started by Trigirl91
Views: 7040 Posts: 46

2013-11-03 1:47 PM Trigirl91

Anyone interested in a masters athlete / older athlete forum? Pages: 1 2

Started by TriAya
Views: 3247 Posts: 33

2011-02-28 8:16 AM monkeyboy64

Athlete's Plate v/s Athlete's Palate

Started by ditchdoc
Views: 2274 Posts: 5

2011-03-07 12:22 PM ditchdoc

Triathlete Mag - 6 Months of Athlete Development

Started by Whit
Views: 573 Posts: 2

2004-09-25 1:55 PM fcarter389

PTC Triathlon Athlete Booklet for Aug 28th's Race

Started by Motivated
Views: 639 Posts: 7

2004-08-26 1:23 PM Motivated
RELATED ARTICLES
date : June 7, 2013
author : Nancy Clark
comments : 0
As an athlete, you are unlikely obese, but you may have concerns about your weight or have relatives who struggle with their weight.
 
date : October 20, 2008
author : Nancy Clark
comments : 0
People who range from casual exercisers to competitive athletes are eating at the wrong times, choosing the wrong balance of carbohydrates, protein, and fat, and drinking too little fluids.
date : September 3, 2005
author : Nancy Clark
comments : 0
The purpose of this article is to look at caffeine (most commonly consumed as coffee) as part of a sports diet and to help you determine whether you want to take it or leave it.
 
date : January 24, 2005
author : Michael
comments : 0
I heard an athletic trainer say that in life we have many setbacks. The key is to overcome these setbacks, but the question is how?
date : January 24, 2005
author : AMSSM
comments : 0
New athlete injury Q&A with the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine.
 
date : December 13, 2004
author : kanoelani
comments : 0
My first experience as a triathlete and my post-season plan.
date : December 13, 2004
author : malvey
comments : 0
Advice on how to get started with a fitness lifestyle - for parents and grandparents.
 
date : October 31, 2004
author : ewkfit
comments : 1
I may not have pre-pubescent hips or breasts and at 36 that would be ridiculous. I do not need to have an "airbrushed body" and why do I revere that?