login
Democratic House Sit in
-
No new posts
 2016-06-23 9:06 AM |
Extreme Veteran  3025    Maryland |  Subject: Democratic House Sit inNo chatter on this? I'm shocked |
| 2016-06-23 10:57 AM in reply to: dmiller5 |
Pro 15655   | Subject: RE: Democratic House Sit in They're old........they won't be able to sit on the floor for long. |
| 2016-06-23 12:18 PM in reply to: Left Brain |
Champion 10154 Alabama | Subject: RE: Democratic House Sit in If a senator changes his vote because these guys are behaving like spoiled children then they have no backbone. |
| 2016-06-23 12:48 PM in reply to: Rogillio |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Democratic House Sit in Looks like it's over. Realistically, how much protest did anyone expect when these people are due to break for the holiday? LMAO |
| 2016-06-23 1:09 PM in reply to: Left Brain |
Pro 6838 Tejas | Subject: RE: Democratic House Sit in Ryans rinos missed a golden opportunity by not letting them vote. I think once the vote failed, they could counter with a bill of their own that would unbind the hands of Federal investigators when investigating islamic terrorists within our borders. Might also have taken every opportunity to point out that this was a faith based terrorist attack and NOT a gun control issue. |
| 2016-06-23 2:26 PM in reply to: mdg2003 |
Champion 10154 Alabama | Subject: RE: Democratic House Sit in RE denying someone their constitutional right to own a firearm based on the no-fly list, I have a few questions: 1. What is the process for putting someone on the no-fly list? 2. Do you need evidence to put someone on the list or is the gut instinct of the FBI analyst enough? 3. If someone is on the no-fly list and are denied or delayed getting a gun did you just tell them they are being watched? 4. What is the process for coming off the no-fly list? Are you on it for life? 5. What is the standard for suspecting someone? Reasonably suspicion? Probably cause? They are Muslim and called family in Iran? Anyone who has been in a mental insititute? 6. How many people are on the no-fly list? 10,000? 100,000? 1 million? 7. If you find out you are on the no-fly list what is the due process to get off the no-fly list? 8. Is the no-fly list a subset or superset of the terrorist watch list? |
| 2016-06-23 2:50 PM in reply to: Rogillio |
| 1502 Katy, Texas | Subject: RE: Democratic House Sit in I'm not thinking that you are going to get satisfactory answers here. Our laws are based on innocent until proven guilty, yet these types of things seem to sidestep that. From September 2011 to some time in 2014 I probably boarded 20 or so flights. I was "randomly" selected for searches on EVERY SINGLE one. That is not an exaggeration. It became somewhat of a running joke between my wife (girlfriend at the time) and friends and we kept track. It was 100% of the time. It also extended to anyone flying with me as my wife found. My full name, which is on my license is Omar Moustafa Gadalla. So I kind of figured out why. The only reason it stopped was that in around 2014, the airlines at Laguarida started using electronic kiosks for check ins. It was always at check in that they would draw a circle with a "C" in it on my boarding pass, or scribble "check" on there (they'd do it all messy so I wouldn't notice). After experiencing that first hand, I'm wary of anything that side steps due process. |
| 2016-06-23 3:47 PM in reply to: 3mar |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Democratic House Sit in Originally posted by 3mar I'm not thinking that you are going to get satisfactory answers here. Our laws are based on innocent until proven guilty, yet these types of things seem to sidestep that. From September 2011 to some time in 2014 I probably boarded 20 or so flights. I was "randomly" selected for searches on EVERY SINGLE one. That is not an exaggeration. It became somewhat of a running joke between my wife (girlfriend at the time) and friends and we kept track. It was 100% of the time. It also extended to anyone flying with me as my wife found. My full name, which is on my license is Omar Moustafa Gadalla. So I kind of figured out why. The only reason it stopped was that in around 2014, the airlines at Laguarida started using electronic kiosks for check ins. It was always at check in that they would draw a circle with a "C" in it on my boarding pass, or scribble "check" on there (they'd do it all messy so I wouldn't notice). After experiencing that first hand, I'm wary of anything that side steps due process. Just admit it.....you were sent here to infiltrate BT. |
| 2016-06-23 4:14 PM in reply to: Left Brain |
| 1502 Katy, Texas | Subject: RE: Democratic House Sit in Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by 3mar I'm not thinking that you are going to get satisfactory answers here. Our laws are based on innocent until proven guilty, yet these types of things seem to sidestep that. From September 2011 to some time in 2014 I probably boarded 20 or so flights. I was "randomly" selected for searches on EVERY SINGLE one. That is not an exaggeration. It became somewhat of a running joke between my wife (girlfriend at the time) and friends and we kept track. It was 100% of the time. It also extended to anyone flying with me as my wife found. My full name, which is on my license is Omar Moustafa Gadalla. So I kind of figured out why. The only reason it stopped was that in around 2014, the airlines at Laguarida started using electronic kiosks for check ins. It was always at check in that they would draw a circle with a "C" in it on my boarding pass, or scribble "check" on there (they'd do it all messy so I wouldn't notice). After experiencing that first hand, I'm wary of anything that side steps due process. Just admit it.....you were sent here to infiltrate BT. Ours sources show you as a high ranking government official....I'm coming for you LB! |
| 2016-06-23 7:53 PM in reply to: 0 |
Pro 6838 Tejas | Subject: RE: Democratic House Sit in Actually, the additional security check is generated on your boarding pass when you print it, not by anyone scribbling gibberish or a 'c' on it. It will be a discrete series of letters in the bottom corner of the pass. Right after 9/11 and for several years after, they were auto-generating the additional security checks on airline employees and their families. Each and every time we flew, we would get the additional screening at the checkpoints or even the gate area. I've already got clearance above and beyond what almost all TSA employees have, so it wasn't anything to do with my background. It was merely window dressing, which is pretty much all the TSA does, give people a warm fuzzy false sense of security when boarding an aircraft in this country. They knew that we wouldn't complain or make a scene because we risk losing pass privileges or security clearance for such infractions. If we lose our security clearance, we can't work, right? It served no purpose other than to let the uninformed sheep think that the TSA was on the job and looking reeeeeeeaaaaaaaally close for possible security risks. Edited by mdg2003 2016-06-23 7:54 PM |
| 2016-06-23 10:51 PM in reply to: mdg2003 |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Democratic House Sit in Originally posted by mdg2003 Actually, the additional security check is generated on your boarding pass when you print it, not by anyone scribbling gibberish or a 'c' on it. It will be a discrete series of letters in the bottom corner of the pass. Right after 9/11 and for several years after, they were auto-generating the additional security checks on airline employees and their families. Each and every time we flew, we would get the additional screening at the checkpoints or even the gate area. I've already got clearance above and beyond what almost all TSA employees have, so it wasn't anything to do with my background. It was merely window dressing, which is pretty much all the TSA does, give people a warm fuzzy false sense of security when boarding an aircraft in this country. They knew that we wouldn't complain or make a scene because we risk losing pass privileges or security clearance for such infractions. If we lose our security clearance, we can't work, right? It served no purpose other than to let the uninformed sheep think that the TSA was on the job and looking reeeeeeeaaaaaaaally close for possible security risks. TSA is not just window dressing.....their biggest mission is to tear your bike box open and try to destroy it.....they suck at it, but they try hard. |
| 2016-06-24 9:03 AM in reply to: Left Brain |
Champion 6993 Chicago, Illinois | Subject: RE: Democratic House Sit in If this sit in is about guns and no fly list? Ok its a little silly. If the list was fool proof then yeah it would be perfect but its not. Should we prevent a 6 month old who is on the no fly list from getting a gun because she is on the no fly list? I think not. Though we should because she is 6 months. Though I like my votes just like I like my speakers at colleges, I am big into letting these things happen and see what happens. |
| 2016-06-24 10:53 AM in reply to: Left Brain |
Pro 6838 Tejas | Subject: RE: Democratic House Sit in Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by mdg2003 Actually, the additional security check is generated on your boarding pass when you print it, not by anyone scribbling gibberish or a 'c' on it. It will be a discrete series of letters in the bottom corner of the pass. Right after 9/11 and for several years after, they were auto-generating the additional security checks on airline employees and their families. Each and every time we flew, we would get the additional screening at the checkpoints or even the gate area. I've already got clearance above and beyond what almost all TSA employees have, so it wasn't anything to do with my background. It was merely window dressing, which is pretty much all the TSA does, give people a warm fuzzy false sense of security when boarding an aircraft in this country. They knew that we wouldn't complain or make a scene because we risk losing pass privileges or security clearance for such infractions. If we lose our security clearance, we can't work, right? It served no purpose other than to let the uninformed sheep think that the TSA was on the job and looking reeeeeeeaaaaaaaally close for possible security risks. TSA is not just window dressing.....their biggest mission is to tear your bike box open and try to destroy it.....they suck at it, but they try hard. My bad. I need to work on giving folks credit for things they've mastered; no matter how insignificant that task might seem to me.  |
| 2016-07-06 8:16 AM in reply to: mdg2003 |
Champion 10154 Alabama | Subject: RE: Democratic House Sit in 60 gun deaths in Chicago this past weekend.....where are they now? |
| 2016-07-06 1:08 PM in reply to: Rogillio |
Pro 6838 Tejas | Subject: RE: Democratic House Sit in Originally posted by Rogillio 60 gun deaths in Chicago this past weekend.....where are they now? They're busy doing other important stuff. http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/06/politics/democrats-boo-sanders/index.... |
| 2016-07-06 1:39 PM in reply to: mdg2003 |
Champion 15211 Southern Chicago Suburbs, IL | Subject: RE: Democratic House Sit in Just as an aside. Crime is up across the US. And not just in "liberal" cities.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/05/13/us/document-violent-crime-data.html |
|
|
|
| Republican Party,,,,,,,,,,, NOT very democratic,,,,,,,, either | ||
| |||
| |||
| Democratic debate Pages: 1 2 3 4 | ||
| Let Kids Drink at Your House and You Could Go to Jail, Maine Couple Warns |
|
View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK