Great Beginner Articles:
is Relaxed Swimming
for Beginner Swimmers + Workout
Started With Swimming (If You Can't Do Many Laps)
THE SWIMMING NUMBERS THAT REALLY MATTER
essentials of stroke count with respect to freestyle swimming.
By Terry Laughlin of
Recently at Masters practice we were swimming 9 x 300-yard freestyle repeats
with breaks after each round of 3 x 300. In the next lane, two triathletes
were talking between rounds. “I’ve been trying to lower my stroke count,”
one said, “but it made me slower, so I gave it up.” On the next 300, I
watched as the other, both taller and slimmer than me, take 21 spl (strokes
per length); at 6-foot-plus, taking 21 strokes under any circumstances is no
different than wildly spinning your pedals in a low gear while cycling down
a hill. By way of comparison, my own count averaged 13.
Later, in the locker room, they were studying a training plan one had just
received from his coach – a “brand name” known for coaching a top U.S.
Olympic-distance athlete. I checked it out. While the cycling workouts
included all the essential elements – mileage, heart rate and cadence mix,
the swimming workouts, while prescribing impressive-sounding “swim zones”
like Level 2 Aerobic and T-30 Pace, made no mention at all of the measure
that is utterly essential for intelligent, effective training: stroke
counts. Any swim program that prescribes only distance, interval or pace is
as incomplete as a cycling or running workout that tells you only how far.
Why is stroke count essential?
Every time swimming success has been analyzed at any level from a city
championship to an Olympic final, stroke length has been the most reliable
factor distinguishing more successful swimmers. While no reliable link has
ever been found between Max VO2 and swimming speed -- and there’s been a
negative correlation between Muscular Power and speed -- coaches and
athletes still cling to the notion that work-to-rest ratios, heart rates and
big paddles are what make you faster. Why? Mainly because habits are hard to
break and swim training methods developed between the 1930s and 1960s still
prevail today even though a growing body of evidence says that efficiency
matters most. But you can make the choice to train smarter -- by making
stroke-counting a habit!
What’s the “right” count?
There is no one right count. A 5’2” woman will take more strokes than a 6’2”
male. The 6’2” male will generally have a higher spl for a 500 than for a
50, or when swimming a 50 in 35 seconds rather than in 40 seconds. Each
swimmer should have a stroke count range (mine is between 13 and 17 in a 25m
pool), that improves gradually over time. If you always count your strokes,
you at least have the information to make value judgments. If your count
jumps from 16to 20 spl as you descend a set of 50s or as you go from 50s to
200s, you can judge whether that was the best approach or set a goal of
doing it more efficiently next time. Every lap that includes stroke counting
automatically acquires more awareness and purpose which produce improvement
far more reliably than “swim zone training.” Their absence leads to
aimlessness and stagnation.
Is a low stroke count always better?
At TI workshops, we occasionally see a student – who has been ardently
lowering their stroke count -- take, say, 12 strokes as we videotape on
Saturday morning. While reviewing their video we might tell them they’d be
better off taking perhaps 15 strokes because the 12-stroke lap was non
rhythmic and over-kicking. The object is to find the optimal rather than
minimum spl. Your low spl should always be fluid, effortless, and silent,
with no overt kicking - the real goal being to minimize energy cost, not
stroke count. And one’s lowest count should drop gradually. Thirty years
ago, while prioritizing harder and faster in training, my low count in a
50-meter pool was 60. Twenty years ago, it was 40spl and ten years later it
had dropped to 32spl. Today, at age 52, it’s 25. If, on the other hand, you
were taking 25 strokes for 25 meters last year, and this year you’re trying
to maintain 14, you’re probably trying to do too much too soon. Make more
ease and flow, less noise and splash, your primary goal. Increases in
efficiency will follow naturally and almost effortlessly.
What if a lower count makes me slower?
A lower count probably will make you slower…at least initially, but that’s
not necessarily a bad thing. A goal of faster, faster, faster is far too
simplistic. Virtually all triathletes now recognize the value of low Heart
Rate training, running mile after mile at, say, 130 bpm to build aerobic
efficiency while increasing their speed incrementally before resetting their
HR monitor to 135. Swimming at a lower stroke count is the exact equivalent.
It develops neuromuscular efficiency which will enable you to swim with a
lower HR at every higher speed. Five years ago I couldn’t sustain 12spl
farther than 100 yards. Now I can swim up to 1000 yards at 13spl. Five
years ago my average 100-yard pace at 13 spl (52 total strokes) was about
1:24. Now I can swim that speed at 11spl or 44 total strokes, which means my
HR is lower at a 1:24 pace. Thus, while my aerobic efficiency may be
shrinking with each passing year, I offset that by increasing my
neuromuscular efficiency which has an extremely high correlation to
performance in open water. While my 100-yard time has gotten slower over
time in an open-water mile, I’m swimming just as fast as I did at age 40 and
am still competitive with pretty decent swimmers who are 20 to 30 years
younger. It also allowed me to swim 28.5 miles around Manhattan in 2002 in
about 26,000 strokes while everyone else in the field averaged about 38,000
How do I go faster then?
Once you establish an efficiency foundation then you can make a conscious
choice to take more strokes when you want more speed – and to practice doing
that efficiently. The guy taking 21 strokes lap after lap can only go faster
by going harder – or perhaps by taking 23 strokes! I do it differently: In
the set above, the coach told us to do 3 rounds of 3 x 300, descending
within each round. I did this by allowing myself only 12spl on the first 300
in each round, then increasing to 13spl on #2 and 14spl on #3, with a goal
of feeling silky-smooth at each count. My times came down, but I never felt
as if I was swimming harder. Instead my descending set was a lot more
enjoyable as a coordination-and-timing exercise. More purposeful too. I
upped the ante by challenging myself to increase the pace in the 2nd round,
and again in the 3rd round, without changing my counts. The point is: Know
your counts and make conscious and intelligent choices. Don’t swim blindly.
Okay, I’m convinced. What do I do next?
Counting strokes is a start but it’s not a magic pill. It reports your
efficiency in real time but will only increase your efficiency up to a
point. Major and ongoing gains in efficiency come mainly from reducing drag
and turbulence. Better balance, a longer bodyline, a sleeker profile and
more-fluent movements will come mainly from drills because muscle memory
tends to impede major changes in stroke mechanics. The good news is that
because you have Human DNA, like me, you can expect incremental gains decade
after decade if you always swim mindfully. Happy laps!
This article has been adapted from Triathlon Swimming Made Easy, published
by Total Immersion. Info: call 845-256-9770 or visit
BT Thanks the following for all
of their support:
15% Off All Purchases
off with 'begtri' code
FROM THE WEB
A great swimming itinerary for all beginners, intermediates
Stuck in the slow lane? Try these 10 ways to swim
Open water 101: Training, racing and safety tips
for swimmers and triathletes
The Swim: Where Balance Begins.
Coaches and Master Swim Programs: Are They a Must?