Running Cadence (Page 2)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2005-01-14 1:11 PM in reply to: #103653 |
Elite 2458 Livingston, MT | Subject: RE: Running Cadence BGTwinDad, just curious, are you a heel or toe striker? If you are a heal striker, maybe you want to switch up. It should beel like baby steps. It should slow you down initially. I'm far from an expert, but if you have Friel's Training Bible, it's in there along with POSE and a couple of other drills. I think Brian Shea's (PBN) site also has an article on it. |
|
2005-01-14 2:48 PM in reply to: #103609 |
Elite 3498 Chicago | Subject: RE: Running Cadence Rich Strauss - 2005-01-14 11:18 AM I stop that fall by....planting my other foot directly under my body. I lift it straight up again, disrupt balance, fall forward, plant my next foot, etc. If done correctly, running is nothing more than falling forward, using gravity instead of muscular force. Yep, that's what Pose teaches you and what I'm an avid believer in. My Pose clinic focused on: 1. good body lean 2. lift foot off the ground like from a "hot potatoe" so your foot is off the ground before it is behind your butt (using an imaginary vertical line drawn down from your butt) 3. balls of feet landing 4. good, high, knee drive, lifting knees straight up immediately after foot hits ground. I'm in my 2nd week of Pose implementation and even though I was running 70% Pose before I even went to Pose, I definately feel a difference in the muscles working and the "relaxing" as I let gravity take me. Edited by Steve- 2005-01-14 2:49 PM |
2005-01-14 3:17 PM in reply to: #103609 |
Veteran 301 Belize | Subject: RE: Running Cadence Rich Strauss - 2005-01-15 10:18 AM If done correctly, running is nothing more than falling forward, using gravity instead of muscular force. Interesting idea and it makes sense. Reminds me of my childhood dreams of flying. Incidentally, isn't running mostly flying since you cover most of the distance with both feet off the ground? Actually, I still have those dreams and in those dreams I'm always trying to teach others how to fly. All you do is imagine yourself becomming very light and step on the air as if walking up a stairway to heaven. It's an awesome feeling. I would imagine that the less time your feet spend on the ground the faster you would fly (run). Edited by David_Zen 2005-01-14 3:27 PM |
2005-01-14 3:23 PM in reply to: #103291 |
Elite 3972 Reno | Subject: RE: Running Cadence I think I am an anti-Pose runner. Not that I am against it, but I am a long striding, lumbering, heal striker...... no wonder I hate it so much...... I am doing it wrong! I have started trying to keep my heels up more... where else should I start? a video? Edited by bootygirl 2005-01-14 3:24 PM |
2005-01-14 3:40 PM in reply to: #103729 |
Elite 3498 Chicago | Subject: RE: Running Cadence bootygirl - 2005-01-14 2:23 PM I have started trying to keep my heels up more... where else should I start? a video? First, perhaps instead of trying to keep your heels up more, just concentrate on landing each foot strike on the balls of your feet. Second, I plan on downloading this short video my Pose instructor gave to me of the "perfect" Pose technique. It'll be in a windows media player file that I can just put on a CD and mail to you if you like. I imagine I should be able to do this within the next week. Shoot me an e-mail if you want a copy of it so you can "see" what a Pose runner's technique looks like. |
2005-01-14 4:09 PM in reply to: #103659 |
Extreme Veteran 494 Horse Country | Subject: RE: Running Cadence I'm definitely not a heel-striker... more of a flat or even lander when going easy.... when I pick up the cadence, my landing moves more to the ball of the foot. Last time I bought new running shoes, the shop guy said the tread wear on my old pair looked almost perfect! |
|
2005-01-14 4:12 PM in reply to: #103291 |
Veteran 113 | Subject: RE: Running Cadence Ok, I'm back. Still haven't friggin' run but I'm back. Nice to see the conversation has been civil. It often can turn nasty when Pose gets involved. I attended a Pose clinic with Dr. Romanov 2 years ago and learned a ton. I've used his ideas with my athletes and my own running. I've conducted about 10 running clinics as well so I've been able to refine these ideas through a lot of experience. Pose says:
Rich's experience coaching athletes with this method:
What I do and tell my athletes: "Run with a quick cadence, lifting up with the hamstring. Keep the contact point directly under your body. Lean forward 'at the ankles,' along the stance line, toward a target in the distance. You should feel as if you're falling toward that target. Change speed by increasing or decreasing lean. It doesn't take much at all. You can feel a fraction of a degree. Don't think midfoot stike. If you do all this correctly, it will just happen. If you try too hard you risk hurting yourself. You should feel as if you are 'unweighting the heel.' Foot contacts the ground in a neutral position (neither on the balls nor on the heels, kind of flat) with the heel barely off the ground." We then do Strides almost daily, insert Form Fartlek into their runs, etc. I strongly believe you should have 1 running form workout per week, regardless of where you are in the season, how fast you are or think you are. The best runners in the sport work on form. If they do it, so should you. Here endeth the lesson, Rich |
2005-01-14 5:34 PM in reply to: #103768 |
Elite 3498 Chicago | Subject: RE: Running Cadence Rich Strauss - 2005-01-14 3:12 PM Ok, I'm back. Nice to see the conversation has been civil. It often can turn nasty when Pose gets involved.
Civil? I can change that pretty quickly... |
2005-01-14 5:36 PM in reply to: #103840 |
Pro 5153 Helena, MT | Subject: RE: Running Cadence Can't say I understand why it wouldn't be civil.... Is Pose controversial or something? |
2005-01-14 5:55 PM in reply to: #103841 |
Elite 3498 Chicago | Subject: RE: Running Cadence kimj81 - 2005-01-14 4:36 PM Can't say I understand why it wouldn't be civil.... Is Pose controversial or something? Change is traditionally not well received by most people... Consequently, Pose gets "mixed" reviews. However, I've been a heel striker/low cadence runner for over 20 years and it served me well. I mean hell, I ran a 1:58 1/2 mile in high school as a heel striker, so why should I change? I probably wouldn't have if I heard about Pose back in high school, but now I'm looking for a way to stay more injury free in my "old" (er..older) age and that's why I switched last year to non-heel strike runner and this year to Pose. Edited by Steve- 2005-01-14 5:55 PM |
2005-01-14 6:00 PM in reply to: #103867 |
Veteran 113 | Subject: RE: Running Cadence In other venues Pose is usually met with a lively discussion on running form, voodoo, lack of research, what about this guy, what about that guy, etc. That's why I don't say "pose method," I just tell you what I know and have seen from my experience. Pose-eque, maybe? Ken Mierke, one of the other Ultrafit coaches, has a running book and video out, Evolution Running. I've seen his presentation last year and I know Ken very well. He is an extremely knowledgeable and scientific coach. He's also done performance testing on a billion athletes and has been able, for example, to put someone on a treadmill, make change x to their form and observe change y in pace and oxygen uptake. He knows his stuff. Edited by Rich Strauss 2005-01-14 6:03 PM |
|
2005-01-14 6:05 PM in reply to: #103875 |
Elite 3498 Chicago | Subject: RE: Running Cadence Rich Strauss - 2005-01-14 5:00 PM He's also done performance testing on a billion athletes and has been able, for example, to put someone on a treadmill, make change x to their form and observe change y in pace and oxygen uptake. He knows his stuff. I would sure hope he knows his stuff after testing 1/6th of the world's population! |
2005-01-14 6:08 PM in reply to: #103291 |
Extreme Veteran 401 Texas | Subject: RE: Running Cadence Just a note, but I started focusing on my running cadence about a month ago and where I used to run comfortably (easy pace) at 6mph now my comfortable pace is 7mph. 6 feels too slow. I spend my warmups counting my steps and then do it every once in a while during my runs to see if I am staying at 90. When I start getting tired is when it starts dropping off, and thats when I start counting again. It helps me focus and keep my pace. I haven't done any speed work or interval training yet, so we will see how it goes. But so far changing my cadence has been a great idea, and my knees are thanking me for it. Im not overstriding anymore. |
2005-01-14 6:21 PM in reply to: #103889 |
Veteran 113 | Subject: RE: Running Cadence Excellent! I've been working on my running for a while. My cadence was 82, I pronate, have flat feet, etc. I spent about 4 years fighting all manner of running injuries. Since I've worked in my form I've been (knock, knock) healthy, with the exception of rolling the same ankle about 10 times. And you're right, it's just a matter of focus. I can honestly say there is very little time in any run, of any distance or pace, that I'm NOT thinking about my form. I'm able to focus for every minute of every run. It's just a habit. Edited by Rich Strauss 2005-01-14 6:23 PM |
2005-01-14 10:30 PM in reply to: #103291 |
Master 1946 | Subject: RE: Running Cadence dreyer & Chi running- similar concept...... Edited by isis54 2005-01-14 10:30 PM |
2005-01-15 3:08 PM in reply to: #103291 |
Expert 751 Texarkana, TX | Subject: RE: Running Cadence OK, I'll join in. Reading this thread this week got me interested to see what my cadence was. I ran today as part of a brick and here are my conclusions. First of all, let me say that I am 6-5, and I beleive that the cadence numbers will be lower for bigger dudes. Now, I am a better than average runner. I can cruise without a whole lot of effort at 8-minute pace for an inderterminent period of time. (That means a long while, welshy.) Also, you can tell from my shoes that I am a heel to mid-foot striker. After running the first mile way to fast today (6:50), I tried to back off and checked my cadence - 80. Now, I held it there for a whole mile and ran the second mile in 7:10, still pretty freaking fast. So I backed off even more. I have always used cadence to control speed, operating under the assumption that my stride length is fairly constant. Moreover, and here is where it gets tricky, my HR is almost always double my cadence. When I checked my cadence at 80, my HR was nearly 160. And this is constant throughout my running. (BTW, I don't own a HRM - I rely on RPE mostly.) If I hold my head just right, I can "hear" my heartbeat in my ears, and it is almost perfectly in step with my footfalls. My personal conclusions: 1) To remain in zone 1 or zone 2, I have to slow my cadence down. 2) If I ever get to be a super-fast runner, then I will have a cadence near 90. But for the time being, a cadence of about 70-75 is where I run comfortably for my long runs. 3) I think it is very important in running to have the foot placed down while already moving backwards. I think this action, which may lead to mid-foot striking, is critical in that the foot will not be moving against your body's momentum at any point. When I sprint, or do strides, I run on the balls of my feet, but as I slow, the contact point moves backward. There you go. So does that mean I believe in Pose or ChiRunning? Depends on your interpretation... |
|
|