General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Socks or No Socks? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2008-07-23 11:34 PM

Expert
763
5001001002525
Behind you
Subject: Socks or No Socks?

Sounds like a stupid question, but most triathletes I've been watching have not been wearing socks after the swim to the bike/run.  I couldn't find anything on the net to reference an advantage except for a quick swim to bike transition. 

For whatever reason, is there a physical advantage, preference, or mental advantage to this?  Since I've been training, I've not wore socks because that is what I see others do, but for the first time in my life my feet stink!  Is there any tips to avoid this (besides cleaning REALLY good after my runs) because the sweat is still in the shoes.  Yuck!Embarassed



2008-07-23 11:59 PM
in reply to: #1554546

User image

Extreme Veteran
589
500252525
Fridley, MN, USA
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?
I would love to be able to go straight from swim to bike to run sockless, as it would quicken the transition, but I can't run sockless! For some reason my feet blister very easily. I found myself pulling on socks in T2 at my last sprint because the thought of blisters in the next week's run made me cringe
But if you can pull it off, go for it!
2008-07-24 4:31 AM
in reply to: #1554546

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2008-07-24 6:02 AM
in reply to: #1554546

Pro
6767
500010005001001002525
the Alabama part of Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?

I've gone sockless without problems on short bike courses, but the one time I did it for the run (and it was at a sprint, so only 5K), my time dropped quite a bit from what I expected due to blisters.  So I would rather sacrifice the 20 seconds to put my socks on.  And FWIW, I was talking to some other people after the race who I had beat on the bike, but who smoked me on the run, and they told me they have a friend who's done Kona and few other big races, and who always goes with socks for comfort. 

Of course, we were all BOP'ers,  it might be different if you are in contention for hardware.

2008-07-24 6:05 AM
in reply to: #1554667

Master
1327
100010010010025
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?

Second the hardware remark.  I'm a sock fan.  Though I never seem to get all the dirt and gunk off so I'm trying a different tack this week, sockless for bike, figuring my feet will dry out, gunk easier to come of and sockless on the bike it's not so blister prone.  i'll probablyl Body Glide up the inside of the shoes to be cautious.

Then for the run, slip on socks.  I don't care if it's a 5K, I went sockless one time, and had even done the BG thing and it was awful.  the 3.5 seconds it took to slip on the socks are de minimus for a BOPer like me

2008-07-24 6:49 AM
in reply to: #1554546

Master
2021
2000
Alpharetta, GA
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?
I never wear socks on the bike. I train that way, and I race that way. It speeds up my T1. Plus, my cycling shoes are very well vented, so they help dry out my feet while I am on the bike. When I get to T2 my feet are dry, and it makes it easier to get my socks on.

In T2 I always put on socks. I figure that the time I spend in T2 putting on socks is made up on the run because my feet do not bother me. My average time in T2 is 40-45 seconds, so I really don't think shaving 10-15 seconds by not putting on socks is really going to help with the bottom line.

Definitely practice putting on your socks and shoes. That practice will help speed up T2.


2008-07-24 7:02 AM
in reply to: #1554560

Champion
9060
5000200020002525
Charlottesville, Virginia
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?

sharp4850 - 2008-07-24 12:59 AM I would love to be able to go straight from swim to bike to run sockless, as it would quicken the transition, but I can't run sockless! For some reason my feet blister very easily. I found myself pulling on socks in T2 at my last sprint because the thought of blisters in the next week's run made me cringe But if you can pull it off, go for it!

x2, I have weak feet I guess....

2008-07-24 7:02 AM
in reply to: #1554546

Champion
8936
50002000100050010010010010025
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?

Big difference between sprints and olympics and longer distance races.

The advantage is quicker transitions.  In a sprint, 20 seconds can be a lot of time.  It doesn't matter if you're competing for podium spots or not.  Most people are there to get their fastest possible time, and transitions are part of that time.  If you're just there to finish, do whatever will get you to that goal.

In the end, you do this sport for your own reasons.  Listen to the advice of others, but do whatever makes you happy and remember to enjoy the experience.

2008-07-24 7:14 AM
in reply to: #1554546

Champion
10154
500050001002525
Alabama
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?

When I started running and doing tris I used to wear big tube/sweat socks.  It never occured to me to wear anything else.  Trying to put tube socks on wet feet killed a lot of time! 

I never liked going sockless becuase of the smell and becuase of blisters.  I now use ankle socks that I can put on very quickly.

~Mike

2008-07-24 7:14 AM
in reply to: #1554546

Master
1741
100050010010025
Chapel Hill, NC
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?
For me, I can do a sprint without socks. And I won my AG by 7 seconds in one race, so that choice was worth it. I did get a bad blister on my heel, but I did not notice it until after the race, so it did not slow me down.

I have tried going sockless in Olympic races, but the blisters were killing me by mile 4 of the run, and that definitely did slow me down. Not worth saving a few seconds in T1. I had practiced a 4 mile sockless run in training and was okay - got blisters, but they didn't bug me till I stopped running. But those extra 2.2 miles made a huge difference.

I like the idea of lubing the inside of your shoes. I might try that idea.

Above all else, don't do anything in a race that you have not thoroughly practiced in training!
2008-07-24 1:44 PM
in reply to: #1554546

Master
2491
2000100100100100252525
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?
I use ankle socks, rolled up and ready in T1. I sweat too much not to.


2008-07-24 1:55 PM
in reply to: #1554546

Master
1420
1000100100100100
Reston, VA
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?
My preference is no socks for sprint and Olympic, socks for HIM and IM. Generally is saves me about 10-15 seconds but I also make sure to practice running and biking w/out socks prior to actually doing it in a race.
2008-07-24 2:01 PM
in reply to: #1554546

Extreme Veteran
373
1001001002525
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?
I have practiced running with out socks and now I rarely wear them at all. It took a little while for my feet to build up. The last race that I wore socks on they were soaking wet and I got a blister. Now I actually prefer running without the socks now... The shoes and feet are sinkier though.
2008-07-24 2:06 PM
in reply to: #1554546

Champion
11989
500050001000500100100100100252525
Philly 'burbs
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?
No socks on bike, yes socks on run. I plan on working towards no socks on the run, but that will take time. I think on a HIM and IM I'd go with socks anyway, but for sprint and oly I want to work up to sockless running.
2008-07-24 2:12 PM
in reply to: #1554546

Expert
939
50010010010010025
Newton, MA
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?
I don't use socks on the bike or on the run for a sprint or oly. HIM and my upcoming IM I will put on socks in T2.
2008-07-24 4:00 PM
in reply to: #1554546

Champion
10668
500050005001002525
Tacoma, Washington
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?

I haven't worn socks on the bike since... 1990? Even when I was racing USCF, and socks were "required" per the racing rules, I never wore them (and never got called on it either).

But running... It's really shoe-dependent. I prefer to not wear socks, and I am very careful about the shoes I buy to make sure that there aren't any seams that will cause blisters or overly rough collar material (something Nike really had going for a while). Mostly I can get away with no socks on the run, but I race Oly and shorter. I'd have to REALLY trust the shoes (and take them the distane in training) before I'd go sockless for a half-IM... Assuming I ever race that far.

Shoe stank? Sure. But if YOU can smell them, you're DEFINITELY not going fast enough...



Edited by briderdt 2008-07-24 4:02 PM


2008-07-24 4:43 PM
in reply to: #1554546

Master
2202
2000100100
Canton, Michigan
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?
I'm a sweathog and wear socks for all bikes and runs in training or racing. I have a pair of Under Armor footies that work real well, but started trying Smartwool socks after reading Coredumps race report from IMCDA on how well they worked for him. They cost a few bucks but are worth it.

I find either ones great regardless on how wet your feet are and actually have raced some rainy events in the last two years where I changed socks in T2.

If you plan on trying sockless, try it in training and make sure it all works for you.
2008-07-24 4:49 PM
in reply to: #1554546

Veteran
119
100
Georga
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?
Funny I stumbled upon this discussion. I am wearing a b lister the size of Texas on my right instep as a result of running w/o socks. I have just purchased a good pair of insoles and should have done that from the start. I am getting ready for my 1st oly August 9th and I hope these new insoles work because I hate trying to get socks on my wet feet. If I ever do a 1/2 IM or bigger I agree that I would probably go with socks because the way I see it, you are ot losing that much time putting them on. Good luck and be safe.
2008-07-24 4:52 PM
in reply to: #1556366

over a barrier
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?
docswim24 - 2008-07-24 1:55 PM

My preference is no socks for sprint and Olympic, socks for HIM and IM. Generally is saves me about 10-15 seconds but I also make sure to practice running and biking w/out socks prior to actually doing it in a race.


+1 - although I don't practice without I just go for it.
2008-07-24 5:50 PM
in reply to: #1554728

Extreme Veteran
487
100100100100252525
Spokane, WA
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?
DerekL - 2008-07-24 5:02 AM

Big difference between sprints and olympics and longer distance races.

X2

Take a look at my RR from last Sat. to see the result of no socks at a 1/4 Iron race. The xtra 20 seconds in T2 would have saved me probably 3+ minutes on the run.

Here's what my shoes looked like after the race w/ no socks.





(bloody shoe2.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
bloody shoe2.jpg (56KB - 40 downloads)
2008-07-24 6:06 PM
in reply to: #1557040

Mountain View, CA
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?
rottieguy - 2008-07-24 2:43 PM I'm a sweathog and wear socks for all bikes and runs in training or racing. I have a pair of Under Armor footies that work real well, but started trying Smartwool socks after reading Coredumps race report from IMCDA on how well they worked for him. They cost a few bucks but are worth it. I find either ones great regardless on how wet your feet are and actually have raced some rainy events in the last two years where I changed socks in T2. If you plan on trying sockless, try it in training and make sure it all works for you.

x2 on the Smartwool socks. Love 'em. 


2008-07-24 6:18 PM
in reply to: #1557040

Member
128
10025
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?
rottieguy - 2008-07-24 4:43 PM

I have a pair of Under Armor footies that work real well, .


x2 on the under armour footies. I use them for both training and racing. As for the OP, I am fine giving up 15-20 seconds in T1 to save my feet from blisters.
2008-07-24 9:06 PM
in reply to: #1554546

Extreme Veteran
362
1001001002525
Security, CO
Bronze member
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?
I bike with out socks, but can run with out them.
2008-07-25 7:01 AM
in reply to: #1554546

Extreme Veteran
909
500100100100100
Westchester, NY
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?
oh yes.. socks are a total must .. i sewat way too much not too.. I also have smartwool socks, but use a race sock that got from SBR in NYC .. they are THE BEST.. for run only events, I also have run specific socks..
2008-07-25 10:47 AM
in reply to: #1554546

Expert
810
500100100100
Southeast
Subject: RE: Socks or No Socks?

I'm confident that I run faster with socks.  I've trained and raced both ways quite a bit, and I'm confident on that point.

As for biking, I really don't know -- I don't have enough experience there.  I've ridden both ways and don't feel much difference.

What really gets me about this debate is that some people will assert times that are far too long for putting on socks.  For example, I read in a recent issue of a triathlon magazine published in Britain that putting on socks adds about 1 minute to your T1.  What??  Are they putting them on with their teeth?  Even with wet feet, I can get mine on in about 3-4 seconds.  (I did it just yeterday.  It ain't rocket science.)

New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Socks or No Socks? Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2