General Discussion Triathlon Talk » HUGE difference in FTP outdoors vs indoors Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2008-11-06 12:55 PM
in reply to: #1791997

User image

Champion
6046
5000100025
New York, NY
Subject: RE: HUGE difference in FTP outdoors vs indoors

KathyG - 2008-11-06 11:51 AM I'm guessing part of the difference Cat is that your VI on the Baker course is 1.1 which bumps up your NP compared to your VI that is closer to 1.0 which I'm guessing was more the case indoors test.

 

ok here is the whole indoor test:

Power-Tap #1:
    Duration:      42:43
    Work:          375 kJ
    TSS:           70.8 (intensity factor 0.998)
    Norm Power:    151
    VI:            1.03
    Pw:HR:          0.08%
    Pa:HR:          -1.68%
    Distance:      11.321 mi
        Min    Max    Avg
    Power:           0    245    146     watts
    Heart Rate:      154    183    177     bpm
    Cadence:         45    146    83     rpm
    Speed:           6.4    19.5    15.9     mph
    Pace             3:05    9:22    3:47     min/mi
    Hub Torque:      0    89    60     lb-in
    Crank Torque:    0    257    149     lb-in

and here is CBTT

Duration:      29:39
    Work:          299 kJ
    TSS:           58.9 (intensity factor 1.092)
    Norm Power:    186
    VI:            1.1
    Pw:HR:          n/a
    Pa:HR:          n/a
    Distance:      10.615 mi
        Min    Max    Avg
    Power:           45    584    168     watts
    Cadence:         32    166    82     rpm
    Speed:           2.7    32.5    21.5     mph
    Pace             1:51    22:27    2:48     min/mi
    Hub Torque:      11    270    55     lb-in
    Crank Torque:    32    1028    181     lb-in

 

so yes, VI is higher on CB,

I think now that I have had all this great input and time to examine that it is a combination of indoors without adequate fans, after long day at work, and 3 days after the outdoor effort and not resting rather swimming and lifting the days before the indoor....

 

so will look ahead to when the next one is - the remainder of the OS I am doing indoor TTs.

 

meanwhile I am tempted to use my last VO2max/LT testing for my power numbers (FTP 170) as it is inbetween.....

 



2008-11-06 3:00 PM
in reply to: #1788165

User image

Expert
1049
100025
Burnaby, BC
Subject: RE: HUGE difference in FTP outdoors vs indoors

I would tend to agree that it probably comes down to cooling indoors.  I've watched even my own "easy" days drop 20W for the same RPE just because I forgot to open the patio door and turn on the fan.  Closely followed by consistency.  As you described, training load, rest, workload, motivation, environment, and duration were different between the two tests.  It makes sense to just choose a date and change over to the method that most closely resembles the majority of your training locations.  If you mainly train indoors, test indoors so the zones are applicable.  

 If your familiar with design of experiments (DOE) it comes down to holding constant all the variables you can so you can use the results to make conclusions about the variables you can't hold constant.

2008-11-06 3:16 PM
in reply to: #1788165

User image

Master
2491
2000100100100100252525
Subject: RE: HUGE difference in FTP outdoors vs indoors
In the winter, I usually still open the sliding glass door some when it's below freezing, just because it gets too steamy and sweaty otherwise. I'm wearing gloves and neoprene booties, but the rest of me would still overheat due to the lack of wind.
2008-11-06 6:40 PM
in reply to: #1789871

Extreme Veteran
454
1001001001002525
OKC
Subject: RE: HUGE difference in FTP outdoors vs indoors
Can't remember the name of it, but Hunter Kemper's coach has a book out that talks about fatigue curves. Very interesting and to me seems like it holds a lot of potential for setting zones even more accurately and/or predicting performances. Much like the Monod model.

Anyway, TriToy: I have the KK trainer with a conti hometrainer tire, and I make sure to follow the instructions on tightening the drum - my outdoors efforts are indistinguishable from my indoors (288 last indoor 20min test, 294 last outdoor). YMMV.

Also, similar to what Rick was saying, I can always put forth a higher effort during a race, not even close. Especially for running in the fall, there's a 5k every weekend it seems. Just cut out your long run & tempo run, then go race. Doesn't have to be a big production with a taper and travel. Spring usually brings cycling club time trials - check with your local bike club.
2008-11-06 7:31 PM
in reply to: #1793770

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: HUGE difference in FTP outdoors vs indoors
lrobb - 2008-11-06 6:40 PM Can't remember the name of it, but Hunter Kemper's coach has a book out that talks about fatigue curves. Very interesting and to me seems like it holds a lot of potential for setting zones even more accurately and/or predicting performances. Much like the Monod model. Anyway, TriToy: I have the KK trainer with a conti hometrainer tire, and I make sure to follow the instructions on tightening the drum - my outdoors efforts are indistinguishable from my indoors (288 last indoor 20min test, 294 last outdoor). YMMV. Also, similar to what Rick was saying, I can always put forth a higher effort during a race, not even close. Especially for running in the fall, there's a 5k every weekend it seems. Just cut out your long run & tempo run, then go race. Doesn't have to be a big production with a taper and travel. Spring usually brings cycling club time trials - check with your local bike club.
I think you are refering to the critical power model which uses short duration tests and it can help you predict your power curve at other durations rather accurately.  
2008-11-06 7:47 PM
in reply to: #1792257

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: HUGE difference in FTP outdoors vs indoors
Daremo - 2008-11-06 11:42 AM

The athletes out there who employ coaches are usually looking to improve for racing and have some guidance.  And while compromises will always have to be made, there is still no better baseline than race data (IMO).

true dat!


2008-11-07 4:49 AM
in reply to: #1793868

Extreme Veteran
454
1001001001002525
OKC
Subject: RE: HUGE difference in FTP outdoors vs indoors
JorgeM - 2008-11-06 7:31 PM

lrobb - 2008-11-06 6:40 ...Much like the Monod model....


I think you are refering to the critical power model ....  


It's similar to the Monod (i.e. critical power) model. But Monod is a regression of work vs. time, whereas this is simply the decay rate between velocity (or power) and the doubling of distances, similar to the old runner's rule, except this is individualized (& easy to apply for swim/bike/run). The book btw is "Championship Triathlon Training".
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » HUGE difference in FTP outdoors vs indoors Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2