General Discussion Triathlon Talk » swimp3 vs. H2O audio Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2009-04-08 8:54 AM

User image

Veteran
250
1001002525
Maine
Subject: swimp3 vs. H2O audio
What are the pros and cons of each. The H2O looks like they have new headphones. Have any of you tried them?
If I go with the H2O, I may go with the headphones that wrap around your head to keep the ear pieces in. Last night I tried the H2O with the older headphones for one lap and it worked ok. One ear piece did fall out but I was in a rush when I put them on. The lady that let me try them thinks they are awesome. She said they never fall out of her ears.

What do you think?


2009-04-08 9:21 AM
in reply to: #2070574

User image

Veteran
277
100100252525
Subject: RE: swimp3 vs. H2O audio
i've been debating the same purchase. love to workout to music!!! can't live without my thumps and ipod. i'll check back for results. thanks for starting this out!
2009-04-08 9:31 AM
in reply to: #2070574

User image

Champion
19812
50005000500020002000500100100100
MA
Subject: RE: swimp3 vs. H2O audio
Swim MP3 player rocks..not headphones to fiddle with and works well. Price has come down a bit since I bought mine.

All the folks at the pool I have seen with other brands/types never can get them to work well and are playing adjusting with them their whole swim as they fall out of their ears. I have trouble with sweat and my headphones falling out in regular MP3 player add in lots more water and head is in the water doesn't logically seem it would work well and it doesn't.

No headphones seems odd but really works well just slip under your google strap and you are good to go.
2009-04-08 10:05 AM
in reply to: #2070574

User image

Veteran
250
1001002525
Maine
Subject: RE: swimp3 vs. H2O audio
The one issue I have with the swimp3 is the rechargeable battery. I've read that when the battery dies you can't replace it. Is that true?
2009-04-08 11:19 AM
in reply to: #2070574

User image

Regular
316
100100100
Subject: RE: swimp3 vs. H2O audio
Got the H2O for Christmas; continue to have r-ear headphone issue(same w/i pod headphones) BUT when they stay in it's GREAT!!
2009-04-08 12:09 PM
in reply to: #2070574

User image

Elite
3315
20001000100100100
Miami
Subject: RE: swimp3 vs. H2O audio
can you guys post a link to a decent waterproof mp3 player?


2009-04-08 12:40 PM
in reply to: #2070574

User image

Veteran
250
1001002525
Maine
Subject: RE: swimp3 vs. H2O audio
2009-04-08 3:35 PM
in reply to: #2070574

New user
3

Subject: RE: swimp3 vs. H2O audio
Since I already own a 2nd gen iPod shuffle, I just ordered the H2O product.  It is $80 versus $150 for the swimp3.  It looks like you need to wear a cap to keep the ear phones in place.  I usually don't wear a cap, but I guess that will change.  While the bone sound transmitting technology looks cool, it only stores 60 songs.  I'll let you know how I like the H20!
2009-04-08 3:36 PM
in reply to: #2070574

New user
3

Subject: RE: swimp3 vs. H2O audio
I should clarrify, that the swimp3 only stores 60 songs.  The H20 is limited only by the iPod.
2009-04-08 7:35 PM
in reply to: #2070797

User image

Champion
19812
50005000500020002000500100100100
MA
Subject: RE: swimp3 vs. H2O audio
stchase34 - 2009-04-08 11:05 AM The one issue I have with the swimp3 is the rechargeable battery. I've read that when the battery dies you can't replace it. Is that true?


I only have to charge it at most once a month.

Not sure what happens if the battery dies and can't be recharged. We tend to upgrade this type of thing every couple of years so not a big issue for me. Possible battery issue vs. not keeping headphones in my years easy decision for me...no cords and easy to use is the Finnis SwimMP3 player.

I have seen the price in the $130s. Trisports.com has 20% off everything sale going on today.

Edited by KathyG 2009-04-08 7:36 PM
2009-04-08 8:17 PM
in reply to: #2070574

User image

Master
1551
10005002525
Virginia Beach, VA
Subject: RE: swimp3 vs. H2O audio
I have both and think the the sound quality of the swimp3 is way better; haven't had any real battery issues with it eaither.


2009-04-09 6:28 AM
in reply to: #2072401

User image

Veteran
250
1001002525
Maine
Subject: RE: swimp3 vs. H2O audio
KathyG - 2009-04-08 8:35 PM

stchase34 - 2009-04-08 11:05 AM The one issue I have with the swimp3 is the rechargeable battery. I've read that when the battery dies you can't replace it. Is that true?


I only have to charge it at most once a month.

Not sure what happens if the battery dies and can't be recharged. We tend to upgrade this type of thing every couple of years so not a big issue for me. Possible battery issue vs. not keeping headphones in my years easy decision for me...no cords and easy to use is the Finnis SwimMP3 player.

I have seen the price in the $130s. Trisports.com has 20% off everything sale going on today.



Thanks for the info.... I think I will purchase one today at trisports.
2009-04-09 8:22 AM
in reply to: #2070574

User image

Pro
5011
5000
Twin Cities
Subject: RE: swimp3 vs. H2O audio


Edited by mmrocker13 2009-04-09 8:23 AM
2009-04-09 8:51 AM
in reply to: #2070574

User image

Expert
1603
1000500100
Westchester, NY
Subject: RE: swimp3 vs. H2O audio

I got the h2o audio and think it works great.  I do not need to put it under the cap to keep it in place, but then again I do not do flip turns, so maybe that is a consideration.

The first few times I used it I had some trouble with the ear plugs not sealing water out and some of the sound getting muffled, but then I read the directions and trimmed down the rubber ear plug things and then they worked much better.

New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » swimp3 vs. H2O audio Rss Feed