Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2009-09-22 4:54 PM |
Champion 19812 MA | Subject: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI Power tap has Will Smith's power data from IMWI and a short article up on their website. His power was so uneven first and second half of the bike. First number is for whole ride, 244 first half avg and 198 second half avg. He was was 9 minutes slower second half than first. I look at it and think that is not ideal race execution but he did come in to T2 right up there in the lead so there is that in his favor.
I find it interesting to see the power data from pros IM races. Edited by KathyG 2009-09-22 5:09 PM |
|
2009-09-22 4:57 PM in reply to: #2420787 |
Master 1610 Kirkland, WA | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI is this the 'gettin jiggy wit it' will smith?! |
2009-09-22 4:58 PM in reply to: #2420787 |
Master 1557 Maine | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI Ok, am I the only one who saw this and thought "wow, I wonder how he had time to do IMWI while making all those movies?" |
2009-09-22 5:02 PM in reply to: #2420787 |
Sensei Sin City | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI I guess that goes to show you how other things make a difference... From what I can tell from the few times I have been tested, I can push 220 watts pretty comfortably and stay in Z2. However, I probably weigh 100 lbs more than this guy. My power to weight ratio sucks... |
2009-09-22 6:56 PM in reply to: #2420787 |
over a barrier | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI Here is my Imoo for comparison, I was slower first half: Duration: 2:52:05 Work: 1658 kJ TSS: 134.5 (intensity factor 0.685) Norm Power: 169 VI: 1.05 Pw:HR: n/a Pa:HR: n/a Distance: 56.206 mi seconhalf: Duration: 3:06:36 Work: 1726 kJ TSS: 139.4 (intensity factor 0.67) Norm Power: 165 VI: 1.07 Pw:HR: n/a Pa:HR: n/a Distance: 57.143 mi My Pt read 113 miles and I was pretty steady throughout the day. The wind was picking up later in the day which slowed us down. I didn't quite find the first and second half point but close enough I also stopped riding aero for the last 9 miles as I was ready to be DONE with the bike. |
2009-09-22 6:56 PM in reply to: #2420811 |
Champion 7233 | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI a few things to note here: his ave power in the first bit is going to be higher with the flatter ground in the first part. hills often lower ave power unless those numbers are set to take out zeros. he is racing other people, and making choices off of what they are doing, and not simply just watching his numbers (or so its sounds from the article). 220, man that would hurt. i am 152 and held 210 for my last half, 10 more for an IM would leave my crippled. |
|
2009-09-22 7:14 PM in reply to: #2420787 |
Resident Curmudgeon 25290 The Road Back | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI The Fresh Prince does IMs? |
2009-09-22 8:22 PM in reply to: #2420800 |
Extreme Veteran 453 Long Island, NY | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI Maine Rob - 2009-09-22 4:58 PM Ok, am I the only one who saw this and thought "wow, I wonder how he had time to do IMWI while making all those movies?"
|
2009-09-22 8:39 PM in reply to: #2420967 |
Champion 19812 MA | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI running2far - 2009-09-22 7:56 PM Here is my Imoo for comparison, I was slower first half: Duration: 2:52:05 Work: 1658 kJ TSS: 134.5 (intensity factor 0.685) Norm Power: 169 VI: 1.05 Pw:HR: n/a Pa:HR: n/a Distance: 56.206 mi seconhalf: Duration: 3:06:36 Work: 1726 kJ TSS: 139.4 (intensity factor 0.67) Norm Power: 165 VI: 1.07 Pw:HR: n/a Pa:HR: n/a Distance: 57.143 mi My Pt read 113 miles and I was pretty steady throughout the day. The wind was picking up later in the day which slowed us down. I didn't quite find the first and second half point but close enough I also stopped riding aero for the last 9 miles as I was ready to be DONE with the bike. I think you executed your IM power better than he did...169 NP/VI 1.05 first half vs 165 NP/VI 1.07 quite impressive! You must drink the Kool Aid and he doesn't I was excited to see progress in Canada this year compared to Lake Placid...VI 1.04 until I got sick at Canada compared to 1.17 at Lake Placid |
2009-09-22 8:44 PM in reply to: #2420968 |
Champion 19812 MA | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI newbz - 2009-09-22 7:56 PM a few things to note here: his ave power in the first bit is going to be higher with the flatter ground in the first part. hills often lower ave power unless those numbers are set to take out zeros. he is racing other people, and making choices off of what they are doing, and not simply just watching his numbers (or so its sounds from the article). 220, man that would hurt. i am 152 and held 210 for my last half, 10 more for an IM would leave my crippled. It's a loop course so shouldn't the first and second half be similar? Sure the out and back is not equal as you go out on the first loop and back on the second loop as I understand the course. Sure pros don't just watch the numbers and make adjustment but still that is a pretty significant variation. To bad he doesn't have WKO+ so we can see the really good data with IF, TSS and all those other good stats missing on the power agent software. It's all relative power numbers not all folks have same power meters, some variation in watts between meters, my coach aims 290 to 300 watts in his HIMs..he's a fast guy. Edited by KathyG 2009-09-22 8:45 PM |
2009-09-22 9:19 PM in reply to: #2421168 |
Champion 7233 | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI i thought it was an out to the loop, two loops, then back? but you might be right on the course, have never done it. it looked to me like he tried to ride away from the group, got a lead and then realized they were cutting into him pretty fast, and decided to sit up and take a gamble with the run. he did say first IM also, so he may have just goofed up the pacing a bit. |
|
2009-09-22 10:29 PM in reply to: #2420787 |
Master 1826 | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI thought this would interest some of you .. power files from kona http://www.2peak.com/tools/hawaii3.php Torbjorn -> Avg Power 300.5watts .. #1 split @ 4:27:40 His weight is listed at 80 kg or 176lbs .. 3.756 w/kg effort.. don't know CdA but here is a comparison.. our rider .. Chris Anker Sorensen .. climber, middle of the road guy .. weight listed at 64kg or 140lbs Stage 9 from TDF http://www.trainingpeaks.com/sw/2UD227GREIEURRMBIK6BGWGZOU but take note of his power zones.. awesome .. FTP around 400 for a 140lb guy is nice Active Recovery (AR) 0-223 (0-3.484w/kg) Aerobic Threshold (AeT) 224-303 (3.5w/kg-4.73w/kg) Tempo(Tem)304-363 (4.75w/kg-5.67w/kg) Lactate Threshold (LT) 364-423 (5.687 w/kg-6.61w/kg) Aerobic Capacity (AeC) 424-483 (6.62w/kg-7.55w/kg) Anaerobic Capacity(AnC) 484+ (7.56w/kg+) |
2009-09-22 11:29 PM in reply to: #2420800 |
Science Nerd 28760 Redwood City, California | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI Maine Rob - 2009-09-22 5:58 PM Ok, am I the only one who saw this and thought "wow, I wonder how he had time to do IMWI while making all those movies?" Nope. That's definitely what I was thinking. |
2009-09-22 11:40 PM in reply to: #2420992 |
Master 2665 The Whites, New Hampshire | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI the bear - 2009-09-22 8:14 PM The Fresh Prince does IMs? Who knew? And he's gotten so pale!! Edited by Slugger 2009-09-22 11:40 PM |
2009-09-23 9:10 AM in reply to: #2420787 |
over a barrier | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI Without knowing Will's FTP its tough to analyze the ride and you really need NP, IF, VI to provide the full insight into the ride. The first and second half are identical from a course standpoint. You have a loop plus a stick - just in a different order. IMO, a lot of wasted effort in his ride. The power drop offs would indicate a he rode way to hard in the first half of the race. From a tactical standpoint, riding hard in the first half did not provide any benefit. The chase group caughts him and he dug himself a whole by riding harder. WKO+ file would be interesting to look out. He had some big power spikes - that's a no no. I was happy with how steady I rode. I've done 1.05 on that course during a race rehearsal but 1.06 is close enough. It also helps to be smaller dude on the WI course and have the right gearing which most people do not have, imo. I've seen the winner of the M25-29 power file, 1.05 VI and max power was 280'ish. He weighs 130lbs though and has an amazing position on the bike. I've done some rides with him and can't even come close to hanging. Edited by running2far 2009-09-23 9:11 AM |
2009-09-23 9:27 AM in reply to: #2421721 |
Champion 9407 Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI running2far - 2009-09-23 11:10 AM IMO, a lot of wasted effort in his ride. The power drop offs would indicate a he rode way to hard in the first half of the race. From a tactical standpoint, riding hard in the first half did not provide any benefit. The chase group caughts him and he dug himself a whole by riding harder. I would hesitate to make any analysis based on this as the way an AGer and pro are going to approach the ride in IM are going to be very different, especially if the rider is with a pack at any point. Even at 10m, there is a benefit to riding behind another rider (or even better, a line of riders). For an AGer, you want to get on the bike and ride easy from the get go; easy, easy, easy is the key to the bike and keeping your power levels in check whether you are on the flat, riding into a headwind or climbing is going to be key to a successful ride. If someone blasts by you, then you let them go as you don't want to compromise your race just to get to T2 with the other rider. For a pro, if a rider blasts by, you need to assess and decide whether or not to go with them and legally draft each other. If you are off the front, you need to decide if you can keep the pace and stay away or if you will be better off waiting for the group and taking advantage of the legal draft from the pack. Then you will have lots of variability in your power depending on if you are sitting at the back or pulling at the front (or try to go off the front again). While I think there are some areas where race tactics could have been improved, I would not worry too much about his VI or power drop-off based on his description of the race. Shane |
|
2009-09-23 9:42 AM in reply to: #2420787 |
Cycling Guru 15134 Fulton, MD | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI 220 seems ridiculously low to me for a pro. But there could be any number of factors. His weight, his position, distance behind other riders and/or vehicles. |
2009-09-23 9:49 AM in reply to: #2421794 |
Champion 7233 | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI also have no idea of his postion or how light he is. faris the year he won kona was at 270 IIRC, but that is a huge jump unless he is a tiny guy. what do the hills look like there, and maybe he has it set of include zeros (cant you change that on a PT?) that would deff draw the ave power down a lot. i know my SRM does include them, and it shows ave power WAY lower than if you take them out. |
2009-09-23 10:04 AM in reply to: #2421807 |
Lake Norman | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI newbz, I think the normalized power numbers "normalize" this - meaning it doesn't matter if zeros are there or not. Someone correct me if I'm wrong. |
2009-09-23 10:25 AM in reply to: #2421837 |
Champion 7233 | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI nickwhite - 2009-09-23 9:04 AM newbz, I think the normalized power numbers "normalize" this - meaning it doesn't matter if zeros are there or not. Someone correct me if I'm wrong. it does, but i dont think we have seen NP numbers yet (if so i missed them), all i saw were totals for the ride in ave power. |
2009-09-23 10:31 AM in reply to: #2420787 |
Master 1826 | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI Normalized power takes the fourth root of the data that has been raised to the 4th power. This has the effect of increasing the prominence of spikes and hard efforts. It doesn't remove zero's an example of the series 10,100,100,100,10,0,0,0,0,0,1000,1000,0,0,0,0,0,100,100,100 has an avergae power of 131 but a normalized power of 562 .. those 1000 watt efforts are huge when raised to the fourth (1e12) |
|
2009-09-23 10:34 AM in reply to: #2421807 |
Not a Coach 11473 Media, PA | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI newbz - 2009-09-23 10:49 AM what do the hills look like there, and maybe he has it set of include zeros (cant you change that on a PT?) that would deff draw the ave power down a lot. i know my SRM does include them, and it shows ave power WAY lower than if you take them out. Why would that help? His average power should include zeros. If he's coasting, that still "counts" in how hard (and how variable) he's riding. |
2009-09-23 10:38 AM in reply to: #2421768 |
Coach 10487 Boston, MA | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI gsmacleod - 2009-09-23 9:27 AM yes, hard to tell without looking at the entire file and knowing his FTP or CdA but the drop in power definitely is significant nevertheless. Also I am curious to see how much time he spent not pedaling/coasting. Finally without adequate data from his run (he apprently got injured) it will also be difficult to interpret whether he paced correctly or not.running2far - 2009-09-23 11:10 AM IMO, a lot of wasted effort in his ride. The power drop offs would indicate a he rode way to hard in the first half of the race. From a tactical standpoint, riding hard in the first half did not provide any benefit. The chase group caughts him and he dug himself a whole by riding harder. I would hesitate to make any analysis based on this as the way an AGer and pro are going to approach the ride in IM are going to be very different, especially if the rider is with a pack at any point. Even at 10m, there is a benefit to riding behind another rider (or even better, a line of riders). For an AGer, you want to get on the bike and ride easy from the get go; easy, easy, easy is the key to the bike and keeping your power levels in check whether you are on the flat, riding into a headwind or climbing is going to be key to a successful ride. If someone blasts by you, then you let them go as you don't want to compromise your race just to get to T2 with the other rider. For a pro, if a rider blasts by, you need to assess and decide whether or not to go with them and legally draft each other. If you are off the front, you need to decide if you can keep the pace and stay away or if you will be better off waiting for the group and taking advantage of the legal draft from the pack. Then you will have lots of variability in your power depending on if you are sitting at the back or pulling at the front (or try to go off the front again). While I think there are some areas where race tactics could have been improved, I would not worry too much about his VI or power drop-off based on his description of the race. Shane And same as Rick 220w for his avg power for a pro seems on the low end unless power/CdA is awesome and/or he is short/light. |
2009-09-23 10:39 AM in reply to: #2421910 |
Champion 7233 | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI JohnnyKay - 2009-09-23 9:34 AM newbz - 2009-09-23 10:49 AM what do the hills look like there, and maybe he has it set of include zeros (cant you change that on a PT?) that would deff draw the ave power down a lot. i know my SRM does include them, and it shows ave power WAY lower than if you take them out. Why would that help? His average power should include zeros. If he's coasting, that still "counts" in how hard (and how variable) he's riding. maybe i missunder stood something (in which case this is good and i am learning!). if your PM does not include zeros, you only have the numbers from power output, if it does, anytime you are coasting its going to be lowering your ave power, correct? |
2009-09-23 10:47 AM in reply to: #2421923 |
Master 1826 | Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI newbz - 2009-09-23 11:39 AM JohnnyKay - 2009-09-23 9:34 AM maybe i missunder stood something (in which case this is good and i am learning!). if your PM does not include zeros, you only have the numbers from power output, if it does, anytime you are coasting its going to be lowering your ave power, correct? newbz - 2009-09-23 10:49 AM what do the hills look like there, and maybe he has it set of include zeros (cant you change that on a PT?) that would deff draw the ave power down a lot. i know my SRM does include them, and it shows ave power WAY lower than if you take them out. Why would that help? His average power should include zeros. If he's coasting, that still "counts" in how hard (and how variable) he's riding. Yes.. If you are coasting your average power will lower, but this is part of the ride and should in fact lower the average power.. Now when I get to a red light and my PT goes for an extra 10-15 seconds and lowers my average power that is a different story.. I believe WKO does some work to try to reduce the second case |
|