General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Will Smith's Power data from IMWI Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2009-09-22 4:54 PM

User image

Champion
19812
50005000500020002000500100100100
MA
Subject: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
Power tap has Will Smith's power data from IMWI and a short article up on their website.

His power was so uneven first and second half of the bike. First number is for whole ride, 244 first half avg and 198 second half  avg. He was was 9 minutes slower second half than first. I look at it and think that is not ideal race execution but he did come in to T2 right up there in the lead so there is that in his favor.

Power (watts)220244198

I find it interesting to see the power data from pros IM races.



Edited by KathyG 2009-09-22 5:09 PM


2009-09-22 4:57 PM
in reply to: #2420787

User image

Master
1610
1000500100
Kirkland, WA
Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
is this the 'gettin jiggy wit it' will smith?!
2009-09-22 4:58 PM
in reply to: #2420787

User image

Master
1557
10005002525
Maine
Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI

Ok, am I the only one who saw this and thought "wow, I wonder how he had time to do IMWI while making all those movies?"

2009-09-22 5:02 PM
in reply to: #2420787

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
I guess that goes to show you how other things make a difference...

From what I can tell from the few times I have been tested, I can push 220 watts pretty comfortably and stay in Z2.

However, I probably weigh 100 lbs more than this guy.

My power to weight ratio sucks...
2009-09-22 6:56 PM
in reply to: #2420787

User image

over a barrier
Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
Here is my Imoo for comparison, I was slower

first half:
Duration: 2:52:05
Work: 1658 kJ
TSS: 134.5 (intensity factor 0.685)
Norm Power: 169
VI: 1.05
Pw:HR: n/a
Pa:HR: n/a
Distance: 56.206 mi

seconhalf:
Duration: 3:06:36
Work: 1726 kJ
TSS: 139.4 (intensity factor 0.67)
Norm Power: 165
VI: 1.07
Pw:HR: n/a
Pa:HR: n/a
Distance: 57.143 mi

My Pt read 113 miles and I was pretty steady throughout the day. The wind was picking up later in the day which slowed us down. I didn't quite find the first and second half point but close enough

I also stopped riding aero for the last 9 miles as I was ready to be DONE with the bike.
2009-09-22 6:56 PM
in reply to: #2420811

User image

Champion
7233
5000200010010025
Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
a few things to note here:

his ave power in the first bit is going to be higher with the flatter ground in the first part. hills often lower ave power unless those numbers are set to take out zeros.

he is racing other people, and making choices off of what they are doing, and not simply just watching his numbers (or so its sounds from the article).

220, man that would hurt. i am 152 and held 210 for my last half, 10 more for an IM would leave my crippled.


2009-09-22 7:14 PM
in reply to: #2420787

User image

Resident Curmudgeon
25290
50005000500050005000100100252525
The Road Back
Gold member
Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
The Fresh Prince does IMs?
2009-09-22 8:22 PM
in reply to: #2420800

User image

Extreme Veteran
453
1001001001002525
Long Island, NY
Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
Maine Rob - 2009-09-22 4:58 PM

Ok, am I the only one who saw this and thought "wow, I wonder how he had time to do IMWI while making all those movies?"



x2 LOL 

2009-09-22 8:39 PM
in reply to: #2420967

User image

Champion
19812
50005000500020002000500100100100
MA
Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
running2far - 2009-09-22 7:56 PM Here is my Imoo for comparison, I was slower first half: Duration: 2:52:05 Work: 1658 kJ TSS: 134.5 (intensity factor 0.685) Norm Power: 169 VI: 1.05 Pw:HR: n/a Pa:HR: n/a Distance: 56.206 mi seconhalf: Duration: 3:06:36 Work: 1726 kJ TSS: 139.4 (intensity factor 0.67) Norm Power: 165 VI: 1.07 Pw:HR: n/a Pa:HR: n/a Distance: 57.143 mi My Pt read 113 miles and I was pretty steady throughout the day. The wind was picking up later in the day which slowed us down. I didn't quite find the first and second half point but close enough I also stopped riding aero for the last 9 miles as I was ready to be DONE with the bike.


I think you executed your IM power better than he did...169 NP/VI 1.05 first half vs 165 NP/VI 1.07 quite impressive!

You must drink the Kool Aid and he doesn't

I was excited to see progress in Canada this year compared to Lake Placid...VI 1.04 until I got sick at Canada compared to 1.17 at Lake Placid
2009-09-22 8:44 PM
in reply to: #2420968

User image

Champion
19812
50005000500020002000500100100100
MA
Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
newbz - 2009-09-22 7:56 PM a few things to note here: his ave power in the first bit is going to be higher with the flatter ground in the first part. hills often lower ave power unless those numbers are set to take out zeros. he is racing other people, and making choices off of what they are doing, and not simply just watching his numbers (or so its sounds from the article). 220, man that would hurt. i am 152 and held 210 for my last half, 10 more for an IM would leave my crippled.


It's a loop course so shouldn't the first and second half be similar? Sure the out and back is not equal as you go out on the first loop and back on the second loop as I understand the course.

Sure pros don't just watch the numbers and make adjustment but still that is a pretty significant variation.

To bad he doesn't have WKO+ so we can see the really good data with IF, TSS and all those other good stats missing on the power agent software.

It's all relative power numbers not all folks have same power meters, some variation in watts between meters, my coach aims 290 to 300 watts in his HIMs..he's a fast guy.

Edited by KathyG 2009-09-22 8:45 PM
2009-09-22 9:19 PM
in reply to: #2421168

User image

Champion
7233
5000200010010025
Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
i thought it was an out to the loop, two loops, then back?

but you might be right on the course, have never done it.

it looked to me like he tried to ride away from the group, got a lead and then realized they were cutting into him pretty fast, and decided to sit up and take a gamble with the run.

he did say first IM also, so he may have just goofed up the pacing a bit.


2009-09-22 10:29 PM
in reply to: #2420787

User image

Master
1826
100050010010010025
Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
thought this would interest some of you .. power files from kona

http://www.2peak.com/tools/hawaii3.php 

Torbjorn -> Avg Power 300.5watts .. #1 split @ 4:27:40 
His weight is listed at 80 kg or 176lbs .. 3.756 w/kg effort.. don't know CdA

but here is a comparison..

our rider .. Chris Anker Sorensen .. climber, middle of the road guy .. weight listed at 64kg or 140lbs 

Stage 9 from TDF http://www.trainingpeaks.com/sw/2UD227GREIEURRMBIK6BGWGZOU

but take note of his power zones..  awesome .. FTP around 400 for a 140lb guy is nice

Active Recovery (AR) 0-223 (0-3.484w/kg
Aerobic Threshold (AeT) 224-303 (3.5w/kg-4.73w/kg
Tempo(Tem)304-363 (4.75w/kg-5.67w/kg
Lactate Threshold (LT) 364-423 (5.687 w/kg-6.61w/kg
Aerobic Capacity (AeC) 424-483 (6.62w/kg-7.55w/kg
Anaerobic Capacity(AnC) 484+ (7.56w/kg+
2009-09-22 11:29 PM
in reply to: #2420800

User image

Science Nerd
28760
50005000500050005000200010005001001002525
Redwood City, California
Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
Maine Rob - 2009-09-22 5:58 PM

Ok, am I the only one who saw this and thought "wow, I wonder how he had time to do IMWI while making all those movies?"



Nope.  That's definitely what I was thinking.
2009-09-22 11:40 PM
in reply to: #2420992

User image

Master
2665
20005001002525
The Whites, New Hampshire
Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
the bear - 2009-09-22 8:14 PM The Fresh Prince does IMs?

Who knew? And he's gotten so pale!!

Edited by Slugger 2009-09-22 11:40 PM
2009-09-23 9:10 AM
in reply to: #2420787

User image

over a barrier
Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
Without knowing Will's FTP its tough to analyze the ride and you really need NP, IF, VI to provide the full insight into the ride. The first and second half are identical from a course standpoint. You have a loop plus a stick - just in a different order.

IMO, a lot of wasted effort in his ride. The power drop offs would indicate a he rode way to hard in the first half of the race. From a tactical standpoint, riding hard in the first half did not provide any benefit. The chase group caughts him and he dug himself a whole by riding harder.

WKO+ file would be interesting to look out. He had some big power spikes - that's a no no.

  • ....

  • I was happy with how steady I rode. I've done 1.05 on that course during a race rehearsal but 1.06 is close enough. It also helps to be smaller dude on the WI course and have the right gearing which most people do not have, imo.

    I've seen the winner of the M25-29 power file, 1.05 VI and max power was 280'ish. He weighs 130lbs though and has an amazing position on the bike. I've done some rides with him and can't even come close to hanging.





    Edited by running2far 2009-09-23 9:11 AM
    2009-09-23 9:27 AM
    in reply to: #2421721

    User image

    Champion
    9407
    500020002000100100100100
    Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia
    Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
    running2far - 2009-09-23 11:10 AM

    IMO, a lot of wasted effort in his ride. The power drop offs would indicate a he rode way to hard in the first half of the race. From a tactical standpoint, riding hard in the first half did not provide any benefit. The chase group caughts him and he dug himself a whole by riding harder.


    I would hesitate to make any analysis based on this as the way an AGer and pro are going to approach the ride in IM are going to be very different, especially if the rider is with a pack at any point.  Even at 10m, there is a benefit to riding behind another rider (or even better, a line of riders).

    For an AGer, you want to get on the bike and ride easy from the get go; easy, easy, easy is the key to the bike and keeping your power levels in check whether you are on the flat, riding into a headwind or climbing is going to be key to a successful ride.  If someone blasts by you, then you let them go as you don't want to compromise your race just to get to T2 with the other rider.

    For a pro, if a rider blasts by, you need to assess and decide whether or not to go with them and legally draft each other.  If you are off the front, you need to decide if you can keep the pace and stay away or if you will be better off waiting for the group and taking advantage of the legal draft from the pack.  Then you will have lots of variability in your power depending on if you are sitting at the back or pulling at the front (or try to go off the front again).

    While I think there are some areas where race tactics could have been improved, I would not worry too much about his VI or power drop-off based on his description of the race.

    Shane


    2009-09-23 9:42 AM
    in reply to: #2420787

    User image

    Cycling Guru
    15134
    50005000500010025
    Fulton, MD
    Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
    220 seems ridiculously low to me for a pro.  But there could be any number of factors.  His weight, his position, distance behind other riders and/or vehicles.
    2009-09-23 9:49 AM
    in reply to: #2421794

    User image

    Champion
    7233
    5000200010010025
    Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
    also have no idea of his postion or how light he is.

    faris the year he won kona was at 270 IIRC, but that is a huge jump unless he is a tiny guy.

    what do the hills look like there, and maybe he has it set of include zeros (cant you change that on a PT?) that would deff draw the ave power down a lot. i know my SRM does include them, and it shows ave power WAY lower than if you take them out.
    2009-09-23 10:04 AM
    in reply to: #2421807

    User image

    Lake Norman
    Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
    newbz, I think the normalized power numbers "normalize" this - meaning it doesn't matter if zeros are there or not. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
    2009-09-23 10:25 AM
    in reply to: #2421837

    User image

    Champion
    7233
    5000200010010025
    Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
    nickwhite - 2009-09-23 9:04 AM

    newbz, I think the normalized power numbers "normalize" this - meaning it doesn't matter if zeros are there or not. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.


    it does, but i dont think we have seen NP numbers yet (if so i missed them), all i saw were totals for the ride in ave power.
    2009-09-23 10:31 AM
    in reply to: #2420787

    User image

    Master
    1826
    100050010010010025
    Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
    Normalized power takes the fourth root of the data that has been raised to the 4th power. This has the effect of increasing the prominence of spikes and hard efforts. It doesn't remove zero's

    an example of the series 10,100,100,100,10,0,0,0,0,0,1000,1000,0,0,0,0,0,100,100,100 has an avergae power of 131 but a normalized power of  562 .. those 1000 watt efforts are huge when raised to the fourth (1e12)


    2009-09-23 10:34 AM
    in reply to: #2421807

    User image

    Not a Coach
    11473
    5000500010001001001001002525
    Media, PA
    Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
    newbz - 2009-09-23 10:49 AM

    what do the hills look like there, and maybe he has it set of include zeros (cant you change that on a PT?) that would deff draw the ave power down a lot. i know my SRM does include them, and it shows ave power WAY lower than if you take them out.


    Why would that help?  His average power should include zeros.  If he's coasting, that still "counts" in how hard (and how variable) he's riding. 
    2009-09-23 10:38 AM
    in reply to: #2421768

    User image

    Coach
    10487
    50005000100100100100252525
    Boston, MA
    Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
    gsmacleod - 2009-09-23 9:27 AM
    running2far - 2009-09-23 11:10 AM

    IMO, a lot of wasted effort in his ride. The power drop offs would indicate a he rode way to hard in the first half of the race. From a tactical standpoint, riding hard in the first half did not provide any benefit. The chase group caughts him and he dug himself a whole by riding harder.


    I would hesitate to make any analysis based on this as the way an AGer and pro are going to approach the ride in IM are going to be very different, especially if the rider is with a pack at any point.  Even at 10m, there is a benefit to riding behind another rider (or even better, a line of riders).

    For an AGer, you want to get on the bike and ride easy from the get go; easy, easy, easy is the key to the bike and keeping your power levels in check whether you are on the flat, riding into a headwind or climbing is going to be key to a successful ride.  If someone blasts by you, then you let them go as you don't want to compromise your race just to get to T2 with the other rider.

    For a pro, if a rider blasts by, you need to assess and decide whether or not to go with them and legally draft each other.  If you are off the front, you need to decide if you can keep the pace and stay away or if you will be better off waiting for the group and taking advantage of the legal draft from the pack.  Then you will have lots of variability in your power depending on if you are sitting at the back or pulling at the front (or try to go off the front again).

    While I think there are some areas where race tactics could have been improved, I would not worry too much about his VI or power drop-off based on his description of the race.

    Shane
    yes, hard to tell without looking at the entire file and knowing his FTP or CdA but the drop in power definitely is significant nevertheless. Also I am curious to see how much time he spent not pedaling/coasting. Finally without adequate data from his run (he apprently got injured) it will also be difficult to interpret whether he paced correctly or not.

    And same as Rick 220w for his avg power for a pro seems on the low end unless power/CdA is awesome and/or he is short/light.
    2009-09-23 10:39 AM
    in reply to: #2421910

    User image

    Champion
    7233
    5000200010010025
    Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
    JohnnyKay - 2009-09-23 9:34 AM

    newbz - 2009-09-23 10:49 AM

    what do the hills look like there, and maybe he has it set of include zeros (cant you change that on a PT?) that would deff draw the ave power down a lot. i know my SRM does include them, and it shows ave power WAY lower than if you take them out.


    Why would that help? His average power should include zeros. If he's coasting, that still "counts" in how hard (and how variable) he's riding.



    maybe i missunder stood something (in which case this is good and i am learning!).

    if your PM does not include zeros, you only have the numbers from power output, if it does, anytime you are coasting its going to be lowering your ave power, correct?
    2009-09-23 10:47 AM
    in reply to: #2421923

    User image

    Master
    1826
    100050010010010025
    Subject: RE: Will Smith's Power data from IMWI
    newbz - 2009-09-23 11:39 AM
    JohnnyKay - 2009-09-23 9:34 AM
    newbz - 2009-09-23 10:49 AM

    what do the hills look like there, and maybe he has it set of include zeros (cant you change that on a PT?) that would deff draw the ave power down a lot. i know my SRM does include them, and it shows ave power WAY lower than if you take them out.


    Why would that help? His average power should include zeros. If he's coasting, that still "counts" in how hard (and how variable) he's riding.
    maybe i missunder stood something (in which case this is good and i am learning!). if your PM does not include zeros, you only have the numbers from power output, if it does, anytime you are coasting its going to be lowering your ave power, correct?


    Yes.. If you are coasting your average power will lower, but this is part of the ride and should in fact lower the average power.. Now when I get to a red light and my PT goes for an extra 10-15 seconds and lowers my average power that is a different story.. I believe WKO does some work to try to reduce the second case
    New Thread
    General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Will Smith's Power data from IMWI Rss Feed  
     
     
    of 2