General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Does stiffness really matter on the bike? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 3
 
 
2010-10-29 12:37 PM
in reply to: #3182893

User image

Champion
7347
5000200010010010025
SRQ, FL
Subject: RE: Does stiffness really matter on the bike?
AndrewMT - 2010-10-29 12:18 PM

Geometry doesn't neccessarily have to be different, but tube thickness would be.  And dampening absolutly is a characteristic of material. 


Tube thickness IS a change in geometry.  See above for my reply about dampening.


2010-10-29 12:39 PM
in reply to: #3182922

User image

Champion
7347
5000200010010010025
SRQ, FL
Subject: RE: Does stiffness really matter on the bike?
Experior - 2010-10-29 12:23 PM

And on #5, really you need to define 'miniscule'.  As I'm sure you know, cyclists and tire companies have done studies of the crr of tires at various pressures, on various surfaces, and I, at least, find the differences to be enough to motivate me to take it into account when considering my tire pressure.


I'm not trying to say RR is not important.  I'm saying that you can tune RR to be best for a give road condition.  But when you ride on lots of different road conditions then the subtle changes become less important (not to say it's not important overall).  Does that make sense?  I'm talking about the delta, not the magnitude.
2010-10-29 12:46 PM
in reply to: #3183380

User image

Elite
4235
2000200010010025
Spring, TX
Subject: RE: Does stiffness really matter on the bike?
TriRSquared - 2010-10-29 12:37 PM
AndrewMT - 2010-10-29 12:18 PM

Geometry doesn't neccessarily have to be different, but tube thickness would be.  And dampening absolutly is a characteristic of material. 


Tube thickness IS a change in geometry.  See above for my reply about dampening.


I hear what you're saying.  When I think of geometry, I think angles and tube lengths. 
2010-10-29 1:02 PM
in reply to: #3183484

User image

Champion
7347
5000200010010010025
SRQ, FL
Subject: RE: Does stiffness really matter on the bike?
AndrewMT - 2010-10-29 1:46 PM
TriRSquared - 2010-10-29 12:37 PM
AndrewMT - 2010-10-29 12:18 PM

Geometry doesn't neccessarily have to be different, but tube thickness would be.  And dampening absolutly is a characteristic of material. 


Tube thickness IS a change in geometry.  See above for my reply about dampening.


I hear what you're saying.  When I think of geometry, I think angles and tube lengths. 


I understand.  But geometry is the physical shape which includes thickness.

Good geeky thread you started here!
2010-10-29 1:17 PM
in reply to: #3183400

User image

Champion
7595
50002000500252525
Columbia, South Carolina
Subject: RE: Does stiffness really matter on the bike?
TriRSquared - 2010-10-29 1:39 PM
Experior - 2010-10-29 12:23 PM

And on #5, really you need to define 'miniscule'.  As I'm sure you know, cyclists and tire companies have done studies of the crr of tires at various pressures, on various surfaces, and I, at least, find the differences to be enough to motivate me to take it into account when considering my tire pressure.


I'm not trying to say RR is not important.  I'm saying that you can tune RR to be best for a give road condition.  But when you ride on lots of different road conditions then the subtle changes become less important (not to say it's not important overall).  Does that make sense?  I'm talking about the delta, not the magnitude.


Got it.

For training, I just pump the same every time and don't think more about it.  For races, if I know the prevailing state of the road (smooth versus rough), I absolutely do think about what pressure would be best.  All these little things add up.
2010-10-29 1:42 PM
in reply to: #3178572

User image

Subject: RE: Does stiffness really matter on the bike?
NERDS!!!


2010-10-29 2:40 PM
in reply to: #3183653

User image

Elite
4235
2000200010010025
Spring, TX
Subject: RE: Does stiffness really matter on the bike?
TriRSquared - 2010-10-29 1:02 PM
AndrewMT - 2010-10-29 1:46 PM
TriRSquared - 2010-10-29 12:37 PM
AndrewMT - 2010-10-29 12:18 PM

Geometry doesn't neccessarily have to be different, but tube thickness would be.  And dampening absolutly is a characteristic of material. 


Tube thickness IS a change in geometry.  See above for my reply about dampening.


I hear what you're saying.  When I think of geometry, I think angles and tube lengths. 


I understand.  But geometry is the physical shape which includes thickness.

Good geeky thread you started here!


That was my hope!
2010-10-29 3:41 PM
in reply to: #3183929

User image

Champion
7595
50002000500252525
Columbia, South Carolina
Subject: RE: Does stiffness really matter on the bike?
tri808 - 2010-10-29 2:42 PM NERDS!!!


Oh, you don't know the half of it.  Laughing
2010-10-29 3:42 PM
in reply to: #3184576

User image

Elite
4235
2000200010010025
Spring, TX
Subject: RE: Does stiffness really matter on the bike?
Experior - 2010-10-29 3:41 PM
tri808 - 2010-10-29 2:42 PM NERDS!!!


Oh, you don't know the half of it.  Laughing


That was one of the nicest things someone has said to me in a long time!
2010-10-31 7:28 AM
in reply to: #3183929

User image

Champion
7347
5000200010010010025
SRQ, FL
Subject: RE: Does stiffness really matter on the bike?
tri808 - 2010-10-29 2:42 PM NERDS!!!


You say that like it's a bad thing
2010-10-31 1:02 PM
in reply to: #3183929

User image

Master
2372
20001001001002525
Subject: RE: Does stiffness really matter on the bike?
tri808 - 2010-10-29 1:42 PM NERDS!!!


Here, let me expound upon that for you...




New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Does stiffness really matter on the bike? Rss Feed  
 
 
of 3