General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Coach or no for first IM? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2010-12-14 9:30 PM

Master
1695
1000500100252525
STL
Subject: Coach or no for first IM?
Having a hard time deciding if I want to spend the $ for a coach. The big benefit will be the organized group runs and rides (camaraderie-of which I have ZILCH now). I could get that if I became more active (OK let's just simply say active) in the local tri club and other things going on around town. I've got access to training plans, so that's not really an issue. The coach WOULD help me, I just hate spending the $.

Others opinions or personal experience? 


2010-12-14 10:50 PM
in reply to: #3249178

User image

Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
My n=1 experiment hiring a coach for a HIM isolated me from my training partners, rather than increasing the group training.  I suppose if everyone in the group is on the same plan, then that's a different story. But when friends were going 4:00 and I had a 3:30 ride, no hills, with x in zone 2, y in zone 3, etc., it didn't really work.
2010-12-14 11:04 PM
in reply to: #3249178


798
500100100252525
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
Can you join a "coached" training group?  Might not be a bad option if you have that available.  I would also recommend you check out Endurance Nation if you haven't.  I joined about a month and a half ago and I'm very pleased so far (my legs are pretty pissed though). 
2010-12-15 9:24 AM
in reply to: #3249178

User image

Alpharetta, Georgia
Bronze member
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
Are you the type of person who would feel more confident knowing a coach was outlining your training?

I am, but I opted for no coach for my first IM mainly because of the money. I got through just fine, but this time around I've already hired one because A) I want to get faster, and B) I would like the confidence that my plan is optimized for ME (taking into account my background, speed, past injuries, strengths and weaknesses), not taken from a generalized book like last year.
2010-12-15 10:00 AM
in reply to: #3249178

User image

Pro
3883
20001000500100100100252525
Woodstock,GA
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?

You have to ask yourself what your goals are for your IM. Is it just to finish or is it to do the very best you can (whatever that might be).

If your ONLY goal is to finish and it doesn't matter to you how you get to the finish line then you may not (probably don't) need a coach depending on your experience level. Training to finish an IM is not Rocket Surgery Lots of Zone 2 rides and runs and you should be fine.

That being said, if you want to take all of the guesswork out of training and you want a plan specifically tailored to YOU and your strengths and weaknesses then a coach is a great investment.

2010-12-15 12:30 PM
in reply to: #3249178

User image

Master
2404
2000100100100100
Redlands, CA
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
Its certainly not necessary, there is more than enough content out there for someone to learn to create their own (or use a prebuilt one) training plan.   I'd recommend it if you have the money to spend, but a coach isn't going to make you a whole lot faster unless you have major form or motivational issues.

I never went with a coach because its alot of money and there isn't a local one around that I trust.


2010-12-15 12:58 PM
in reply to: #3249178

User image

Champion
19812
50005000500020002000500100100100
MA
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
goobergirl98 - 2010-12-14 10:30 PM Having a hard time deciding if I want to spend the $ for a coach. The big benefit will be the organized group runs and rides (camaraderie-of which I have ZILCH now). I could get that if I became more active (OK let's just simply say active) in the local tri club and other things going on around town. I've got access to training plans, so that's not really an issue. The coach WOULD help me, I just hate spending the $.

Others opinions or personal experience? 


So the coach is local? He/she offers organized runs and rides?

You discuss your goals, your strengths, weaknesses, how you like to train, review your training and racing before you start with them, they help you decide on races....then they guide you with training. What I understand you to describe is much different type of coaching than many if not most folks here on BT use. Most is via the internet,you get a plan, you do the workouts, record them someplace he/she can review, email and chat with your coach to discuss issues, goals, ect.  Trusting someone else to prepare you can be a relief for some and other can't give over that control. Ideally the coach's view on training lines up with yours and you click well so you get along. Do they have the knowledge, experience and track record with others of your ability?

Sounds like you want friends to train with more than a coach but I may be off on that.

Local tri club or BT is great way to find others with same passion as you have.

I've belonged to two different tri clubs since '04. Issue I have is to do some training with them a hour swim now becomes 2.5 hours with drive, chatting and swim. A 4 hour bike takes 6, ect. I don't have extra time for that on a regular basis with my kids and their activities. I want my training to be as efficient as possible. I have made tri friends mostly through BT that I will meet to ride, swim in lake or pool but not often.

I like having a coach on many levels. It makes it easier and they are watching over my training and adapting it as necessary.
2010-12-15 4:33 PM
in reply to: #3249876

User image

Alpharetta, Georgia
Bronze member
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
furiousferret - 2010-12-15 12:30 PM Its certainly not necessary, there is more than enough content out there for someone to learn to create their own (or use a prebuilt one) training plan.   I'd recommend it if you have the money to spend, but a coach isn't going to make you a whole lot faster unless you have major form or motivational issues.

I never went with a coach because its alot of money and there isn't a local one around that I trust.


I dunno, I'll let you know on August 28, but....
Of the multiple coached friends I have, there seems to be something about a coach telling you to run X:XX/minute miles for XX minutes, then switch to X:XX/minute miles for XX minutes - or ride at such-and-such heart rate for this long, etc... things that they or I would never think up on our own, or even know if it was productive or not. And no book is going to tell me because the book has no idea what my capabilities, history, or strengths/weaknesses are. That is why they are coaches and we are not
 
2010-12-15 4:49 PM
in reply to: #3249245

User image

Champion
5495
5000100100100100252525
Whizzzzzlandia
Silver member
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
ChrisM - 2010-12-14 10:50 PM My n=1 experiment hiring a coach for a HIM isolated me from my training partners, rather than increasing the group training.  I suppose if everyone in the group is on the same plan, then that's a different story. But when friends were going 4:00 and I had a 3:30 ride, no hills, with x in zone 2, y in zone 3, etc., it didn't really work.


Exactly my experience as well.

I had a coach for my HIMs and got rid of him when I trained for my IM. I just went with the group and it was waaaaaaay more flexible.
2010-12-15 5:51 PM
in reply to: #3249178

User image

Master
1411
1000100100100100
Lexington, KY
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
goobergirl98 - 2010-12-14 10:30 PM Having a hard time deciding if I want to spend the $ for a coach. The big benefit will be the organized group runs and rides (camaraderie-of which I have ZILCH now). I could get that if I became more active (OK let's just simply say active) in the local tri club and other things going on around town. I've got access to training plans, so that's not really an issue. The coach WOULD help me, I just hate spending the $.

Others opinions or personal experience? 


I've done two IM's with no coach.  I decided against using a coach primarily because I like the freedom of making things up as I go.  But, if my goal were to nail my best possible IM performance, then I'd restructure certain aspects of my life and get a solid coach.

Also, IME, the most important thing a good coach will do for a first IM is protect you from yourself.  I could have used this for my first IM.  I wasn't careful enough with my run volume/pacing and got a stress fracture in my hip.
2010-12-16 9:27 AM
in reply to: #3250255

User image

Champion
6962
500010005001001001001002525
Atlanta, Ga
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
wiky - 2010-12-15 6:51 PM
goobergirl98 - 2010-12-14 10:30 PM Having a hard time deciding if I want to spend the $ for a coach. The big benefit will be the organized group runs and rides (camaraderie-of which I have ZILCH now). I could get that if I became more active (OK let's just simply say active) in the local tri club and other things going on around town. I've got access to training plans, so that's not really an issue. The coach WOULD help me, I just hate spending the $.

Others opinions or personal experience? 


I've done two IM's with no coach.  I decided against using a coach primarily because I like the freedom of making things up as I go.  But, if my goal were to nail my best possible IM performance, then I'd restructure certain aspects of my life and get a solid coach.

Also, IME, the most important thing a good coach will do for a first IM is protect you from yourself.  I could have used this for my first IM.  I wasn't careful enough with my run volume/pacing and got a stress fracture in my hip.


This nugget is something that is lost a lot of times.  I feel it's important to keep a 20,000 foot level view of things and I find it hard to do as an athlete.  That's why, even though I'm a coach, I have a coach.  Also, it keep you on track when the emotions and uncertainty enter into it.


2010-12-16 12:00 PM
in reply to: #3250214

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
@ Whizzzzz and ChrisM - that's bad to read. Was the coach adamant of not letting you be flexible with your session when group training? Did he/she knew about your interest for group training? If so, did you communicate with him to let him know your displeasure?

I feel my approach is ever changing and I understand that enjoying training is a big part of successful AG coaching. With a Pro/Elite I can be more tough in what it needs to be done, but also, they have very defined goals. And while some AGers do too, still, keeping the lifestyle fun aspect of training alive and social for many is very important (including myself). IOW, a good coach has to adjust to the athlete's personality and develop a program based on that.

One of the things we do is to ask our athletes if they participate in group training and we plan around that. Sometimes they might go longer/harder or easier/shorter of what the plan suggests but that's ok. There has to be flexibility because no matter how much I plan in my head what athletes can do, I can't know for sure so they have flexibility to go based on how they feel. I try communicating what sessions are important in the big scheme of the program but also, as long as they communicate what they do helps adjust/tweak the plan when necessary.

I request from athletes a weekly training summary to learn what worked, what didn't, what's coming up (trips, maybe new group sessions) etc. and adjust based on that, but then again, we also provide planning delivered every week as opposed to every 4 weeks which can limit flexibility.

Anyway, I hope that experience hasn't completely changed your perception about coaching and please be aware that there are more than a few coaches who understand and develop programs with this stuff in mind.
2010-12-16 12:13 PM
in reply to: #3249178

User image

Pro
4360
200020001001001002525
Baton Rouge area
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?

Perfect timing for this thread as I am considering using a coach for my first IM in Sept.  Although I was looking more to the internet approach (mentioned above) as it would probably be cheaper and easier to fit into my lifestyle.  Trying adjust my schedule to make a group ride is just too hard with a family with young kids.

2010-12-16 12:26 PM
in reply to: #3249876

User image

Champion
9407
500020002000100100100100
Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
furiousferret - 2010-12-15 2:30 PM

Its certainly not necessary, there is more than enough content out there for someone to learn to create their own (or use a prebuilt one) training plan.


There is most definitely lots of information out there, however lots of people don't want to bother to sift through it all and then build their own plan.  Further, for every piece of solid training advice, there is at least as much poor training advice, and in many cases it can be hard to someone to figure out which is which.

I'd recommend it if you have the money to spend, but a coach isn't going to make you a whole lot faster unless you have major form or motivational issues.


This is most definitely not my experience; many athletes, even those who have plateaued for several seasons, make solid gains when they start working with a coach because their training is now specific to their events and goals.

Shane
2010-12-16 2:06 PM
in reply to: #3251146

Master
1695
1000500100252525
STL
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
GaryRM - 2010-12-16 12:13 PM

Perfect timing for this thread as I am considering using a coach for my first IM in Sept.  Although I was looking more to the internet approach (mentioned above) as it would probably be cheaper and easier to fit into my lifestyle.  Trying adjust my schedule to make a group ride is just too hard with a family with young kids.



Yeah...I haven't looked into online, that was my next step. I hear on the scheduled thing at the same time, I don't think I really want to spend 6 hours on a bike ride alone! I have two kids who play sports and I rarely miss a game.

As to everyone else, you got me thinking. I want to finish an IM strong-not looking to break any records. I have a training plan and am confidant in my ability to follow it and tweak if necessary. In the future seasons, I'd like to see my shorter races get even better and stronger so maybe THAT is something I should save the $ for towards coaching. 
2010-12-16 6:42 PM
in reply to: #3251171

User image

Master
1404
1000100100100100
Saratoga Springs, Utah
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
gsmacleod - 2010-12-16 11:26 AM
furiousferret - 2010-12-15 2:30 PM

Its certainly not necessary, there is more than enough content out there for someone to learn to create their own (or use a prebuilt one) training plan.


There is most definitely lots of information out there, however lots of people don't want to bother to sift through it all and then build their own plan.  Further, for every piece of solid training advice, there is at least as much poor training advice, and in many cases it can be hard to someone to figure out which is which.

I'd recommend it if you have the money to spend, but a coach isn't going to make you a whole lot faster unless you have major form or motivational issues.


This is most definitely not my experience; many athletes, even those who have plateaued for several seasons, make solid gains when they start working with a coach because their training is now specific to their events and goals.

Shane


x2

I like having someone else build my plan. I do not think a pre built plan would have worked for me. Too many things pop up that alters my training, like work, injury ( which I can not seem to get rid of), family, etc. So having a coach worked really well for me because he could alter the plan to fit my needs and still get the most out of my training. On the other hand I understand the social aspect of having training partners. For me though I like to do nearly all my training on my own so no big deal. I do think a coach can make you a lot faster especially with those type of athletes who tend to train their strength and not focus on their weaknesses. For an IM I am not sure you can hide a weakness because they tend to affect the other legs to some degree and not in a positive way.


2010-12-16 9:00 PM
in reply to: #3249178

User image

Expert
663
5001002525
A little slice of paradise
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?

First Ironman no coach.

Second Ironman had a coach and took 2 1/2 hours off my time. For me, having a coach lets me concentrate on my workouts and not think about "Am I doing too much  or to little." 
If you are looking for group rides/run, than I would say join the local tri club or ask around at the running stores if they do group runs.

2010-12-16 9:14 PM
in reply to: #3249876

User image

Champion
5781
5000500100100252525
Northridge, California
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
furiousferret - 2010-12-15 10:30 AM Its certainly not necessary, there is more than enough content out there for someone to learn to create their own (or use a prebuilt one) training plan.   I'd recommend it if you have the money to spend, but a coach isn't going to make you a whole lot faster unless you have major form or motivational issues.

I never went with a coach because its alot of money and there isn't a local one around that I trust.


X2 to all of this for me...except maybe the "trust" part...
2010-12-16 9:19 PM
in reply to: #3251128

User image

Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
JorgeM - 2010-12-16 10:00 AM @ Whizzzzz and ChrisM - that's bad to read. Was the coach adamant of not letting you be flexible with your session when group training? Did he/she knew about your interest for group training? If so, did you communicate with him to let him know your displeasure?
snip>


Actually, eventually I did raise it with her.  At first I wanted to be a "good pupil"  , but realized I was missing too much of the social aspect.  i was getting faster, however, but as I felt at the time, having a "good time" was more important to me than having a "good (fast) time".

So she agreed that Saturday long rides were mine to do as I wished.  Unfortunately, the next week I got sick and stopped training and racing for several months, so I never really got to find out how it would have worked.
2010-12-17 8:36 AM
in reply to: #3251772

New user
36
25
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
FredsRider - 2010-12-16 9:00 PM

First Ironman no coach.

Second Ironman had a coach and took 2 1/2 hours off my time. For me, having a coach lets me concentrate on my workouts and not think about "Am I doing too much  or to little." 
If you are looking for group rides/run, than I would say join the local tri club or ask around at the running stores if they do group runs.



X2 I saved some money, I finished my first IM and learnt a lot of lessons, and now I'm thinking about a coach for my second go around. I now know that I can train and finish an IM on my own, now the lesson I want to learn is what is the optimal time and that is where I believe a good coach can help me out. It is a little more risk in doing your first IM on your own, but you certainly remember all the mistakes you made! Good luck,
2010-12-17 9:44 AM
in reply to: #3251323

User image

Expert
708
500100100
work, road, bike, pool
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
who is the coach you are thinking about highering and how much??

i coached my self and was able to make that 12 hour finish

goobergirl98 - 2010-12-16 2:06 PM

GaryRM - 2010-12-16 12:13 PM

Perfect timing for this thread as I am considering using a coach for my first IM in Sept.  Although I was looking more to the internet approach (mentioned above) as it would probably be cheaper and easier to fit into my lifestyle.  Trying adjust my schedule to make a group ride is just too hard with a family with young kids.



Yeah...I haven't looked into online, that was my next step. I hear on the scheduled thing at the same time, I don't think I really want to spend 6 hours on a bike ride alone! I have two kids who play sports and I rarely miss a game.

As to everyone else, you got me thinking. I want to finish an IM strong-not looking to break any records. I have a training plan and am confidant in my ability to follow it and tweak if necessary. In the future seasons, I'd like to see my shorter races get even better and stronger so maybe THAT is something I should save the $ for towards coaching. 


Edited by tri-dg 2010-12-17 9:53 AM


2010-12-18 9:39 AM
in reply to: #3249178

User image

Master
2158
20001002525
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
As said above, it really depends on your goals, experience and comfort with the coach.
In addition, I want to say it is also a matter of how much mental effort you want to put into making training decisions.

Paying a coach is a great way to get help handling the details of what to do when. In addition, a coach gives you an outside, more objective look at what is happening.

I was self-coached from sprint to IM. Happy with my progress and growth, but spent a lot of time researching and trying new things.

I am thinking of getting a coach for my next IM. My concern is finding someone I am going to be able to trust enough to listen to if I want to do something different. 

Good Luck! 
2010-12-18 10:06 AM
in reply to: #3251786

Member
208
100100
Williamsburg VA
Subject: RE: Coach or no for first IM?
I'm not going pro and I can't seem to find that "extra" money laying around to spend on a coach. There is more than enough information available out there for AG athletes so that they can create their own training plans. If you do have the "extra" money and are more comfortable having an expert guide, go for it. But is it necessary for an AGer.... no. I'll spend the money I save on Christmas presents for my kids. Sorry, sometimes I think us amateur, AG, athletes get a bit carried away. Enjoy the sport, the lifestyle, and compete! But it doesn't have to be that complicated.
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Coach or no for first IM? Rss Feed