Other Resources My Cup of Joe » NFL labour talks showing no progress? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
2006-03-04 8:16 PM

User image

Master
2287
2000100100252525
Calgary, Alberta
Subject: NFL labour talks showing no progress?
Was just browsing some of the OLD cup of Joe threads and came across this one about the NHL strike 2 years ago.

http://www.beginnertriathlete.com/discussion/forums/thread-view.asp...

Seems like the NHL recovered just fine after the strike but then again living in Calgary the fans were still on a high from the 2003/2004 playoffs.

What's folks thoughts/feelings about what's going on in the NFL?
http://www.tsn.ca/nfl/news_story.asp?id=157085


2006-03-04 9:35 PM
in reply to: #361069

User image

Elite
2999
2000500100100100100252525
Hattiesburg, Mississippi
Subject: RE: NFL labour talks showing no progress?
What the hell is it with every sport going on strike.
2006-03-05 5:35 AM
in reply to: #361069

User image

Resident Curmudgeon
25290
50005000500050005000100100252525
The Road Back
Gold member
Subject: RE: NFL labour talks showing no progress?
Just the ongoing soap opera entitled "When Millionaires Can't Get Along." Fans, of course, are the only ones who stand a chance of losing anything.
2006-03-05 8:32 AM
in reply to: #361069

User image

Master
1938
100050010010010010025
La Crosse
Subject: RE: NFL labour talks showing no progress?

What is this "labour" thing of which you speak? Some strange Canuckian invention?


. . .

I don't believe that the NFL talks are actually that serious; certainly not as bad as the NHL impasse. This is a minor disagreement, not a deal breaker; the NHL was players versus owners, and the cash over cap debate is owners versus owners. Granted, it's rich owners versus not-so-rich owners. But still, there's far more shared ground at the table right now than there was for the NHL lockout.

See this article . . .

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2354095
2006-03-05 3:23 PM
in reply to: #361069

User image

Master
1938
100050010010010010025
La Crosse
Subject: RE: NFL labour talks showing no progress?
Greetings from the Columbus airport, from whence I was supposed to leave two minutes ago, but since there's no plane at my gate, that's probably going to be sort of difficult.

Thankfully, I've got a wireless signal, and can post this NFL update:

March 5, 2006
N.F.L. and Players Union Revive Their Negotiations

By JUDY BATTISTA
Representatives for National Football League owners and the players union revived their negotiations today with renewed hope that an extension of the collective bargaining agreement is within reach.

The chances for a deal appeared bleak when talks broke off Saturday afternoon and union officials headed home to Washington. But the head of the union, Gene Upshaw, told ESPN this morning that the two sides communicated by e-mail on Saturday night and that he was headed back to New York to resume talks.

Last Thursday, the two sides agreed to push back the waiver deadline until 6 p.m. today, but if a deal is close, it is likely that the deadline will again be postponed.

The league would have to inform teams of a new salary cap figure — it is currently set at $94.5 million — before the start of free agency, which is now scheduled to start on Monday. A new deal would mean that the salary cap would jump by an estimated $10 million and that teams would need additional time to make roster decisions. It would likely avert what was expected to be a deluge of cuts of high-priced veteran players if an extension was not reached.

The union had been seeking 60 percent of total football revenue for players, but owners were offering about 56 percent. Both sides are thought to have moved slightly off those figures to bring a deal closer.

The sides were also discussing ways to narrow the gap between high-revenue teams and lower-revenue teams. A new deal is likely to include provisions to limit the spending of money over the salary cap — called "cash over cap" — which provides a significant advantage to teams that have more cash to lavish on players in the form of signing bonuses that, under salary cap accounting rules, is spread out over years of a contract.
2006-03-05 5:58 PM
in reply to: #361200

User image

COURT JESTER
12230
50005000200010010025
ROCKFORD, IL
Subject: RE: NFL labour talks showing no progress?

the bear - 2006-03-05 4:35 AM Just the ongoing soap opera entitled "When Millionaires Can't Get Along." Fans, of course, are the only ones who stand a chance of losing anything.

LET'EM STRIKE.....won't miss them (current players) that much. 

Bring in replacement players like back in the 80's.  As long as they wear Packers green and yellow, I'll cheer for them.

By then, maybe Paul Crewe will be out of prison and can play in the league again.  Someone might want him after is performance against the guards. 



2006-03-06 4:25 PM
in reply to: #361069

Veteran
407
100100100100
Dallas, Texas
Subject: RE: NFL labour talks showing no progress?
Hockey is making a suprising rebound--then again, Dallas really embraced hockey when the STARS moved.

While an NFL strike/lockout would be a bummer, we'd still have college--a FAR superior game, IMO. The hell with them--let them strike/lockout.

Bill
2006-03-06 4:44 PM
in reply to: #361069

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2006-03-06 4:59 PM
in reply to: #362481

Resident Curmudgeon
25290
50005000500050005000100100252525
The Road Back
Gold member
Subject: RE: NFL labour talks showing no progress?

oneword - 2006-03-06 4:44 PM What bugs me more than player strikes in pro athletics is when public dollars are used to pay for the pro stadiums (as well as in big-time college athletics). This is something that private dollars should be covering.

Provided you ignore the economic impact that a pro team brings to a city. I have no problem spending a couple hundred million for an annual economic impact of a similar amount.

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » NFL labour talks showing no progress? Rss Feed