Other Resources My Cup of Joe » 545 vs. 300,000,000 People Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
2013-04-13 11:17 AM

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: 545 vs. 300,000,000 People

I was reading the IRA tax thread and a friend of mine just re-posted this on Facebook.  I saw it several years ago, but thought it was worth sharing.  It's pretty neutral from a political standpoint, but there's a lot of truth in here.

545 vs. 300,000,000 People
-By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don't propose a federal budget. The President does.

You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits.. ( The President can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.)

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House?( John Boehner. He is the leader of the majority party. He and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want. ) If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to. [The House has passed a budget but the Senate has not approved a budget in over three years. The President's proposed budgets have gotten almost unanimous rejections in the Senate in that time. ]

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.

If the Army & Marines are in Iraq and Afghanistan it's because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan ..

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power.
Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible. They, and they alone, have the power.

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses. Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees... We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.

What you do with this article now that you have read it... is up to you.
This might be funny if it weren't so true.
Be sure to read all the way to the end:

Tax his land,
Tax his bed,
Tax the table,
At which he's fed.

Tax his tractor,
Tax his mule,
Teach him taxes
Are the rule.

Tax his work,
Tax his pay,
He works for
peanuts anyway!

Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat.

Tax his ties,
Tax his shirt,
Tax his work,
Tax his dirt.

Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he
Tries to think.

Tax his cigars,
Tax his beers,
If he cries
Tax his tears.

Tax his car,
Tax his gas,
Find other ways
To tax his .

Tax all he has
Then let him know
That you won't be done
Till he has no dough.

When he screams and hollers;
Then tax him some more,
Tax him till
He's good and sore.

Then tax his coffin,
Tax his grave,
Tax the sod in
Which he's laid...

Put these words
Upon his tomb,
'Taxes drove me
to my doom...'

When he's gone,
Do not relax,
Its time to apply
The inheritance tax.
Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Excise Taxes
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon)
Gross Receipts Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Personal Property Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service Charge Tax
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax
Sales Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Taxes
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax

STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?
Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, & our nation was the most prosperous in the world. We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

What in the heck happened? Can you spell 'politicians?'



2013-04-13 11:37 AM
in reply to: #4698884

User image

Elite
4564
200020005002525
Boise
Subject: RE: 545 vs. 300,000,000 People
That's why I don't vote D or R. They are so entrenched it's ridiculous.
2013-04-13 8:01 PM
in reply to: #4698884

Master
5557
50005002525
, California
Subject: RE: 545 vs. 300,000,000 People

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Yeah but here's the deal.  Special interests to both parties have the greatest influence at the *primary* election level.  So if a politician is elected these days, and he doesn't play nice with these folks, he'll be on the quick list to lose the next primary.  Which is less than 2 years away for a Representative.

When both parties do this, what do you think we get to choose from in the general election?  A couple candidates who will both do what their special interests want.

Yeah I know we could all start a campaign to write in a candidate (hey it's happened: Murkowski of Alaska did this to overcome the primary problem I just talked about).  But normally the inertia is too much to succeed.

 

Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago

Cars didn't exist either.  Liquor was soon to be illegal.  Electricity was barely in use.  You get the idea.  Different times.  Oh and your list doesn't mention the taxes existed back then but not today (like a tax on slaves).

 

Not saying it's a bad writeup but it's a persuasion piece; not terribly objective.

2013-04-15 4:00 AM
in reply to: #4698884

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2013-04-15 6:47 AM
in reply to: #4698884

Champion
14571
50005000200020005002525
the alamo city, Texas
Subject: RE: 545 vs. 300,000,000 People

Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

What in the heck happened? Can you spell 'politicians?'

thank you politicians that i can go to college and have a career and don't have to stay home to raise the children.

i also like the worker's comp tax, i have seen a man's arm torn out of it's socket by machinery and that worker's comp allows his family (wife at home with the kids, so i'm sure you approve) to survive.

none of the state taxes are set by the federal gov, add a couple hundred (thousand?) more representatives to your list there!



Edited by mehaner 2013-04-15 6:48 AM
2013-04-15 7:05 AM
in reply to: #4698884

Extreme Veteran
577
500252525
Connecticut
Subject: RE: 545 vs. 300,000,000 People

The whole system if fubar..even if you found 545 that worked together to find answers to fix it, Im not sure they could...

In other words sure you can blame the 545 that are presently in office BUT they are dealing with the mistakes of the past 237 years!lol



2013-04-15 7:20 AM
in reply to: #4700226

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: 545 vs. 300,000,000 People
mehaner - 2013-04-15 6:47 AM

Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

What in the heck happened? Can you spell 'politicians?'

thank you politicians that i can go to college and have a career and don't have to stay home to raise the children.

i also like the worker's comp tax, i have seen a man's arm torn out of it's socket by machinery and that worker's comp allows his family (wife at home with the kids, so i'm sure you approve) to survive.

none of the state taxes are set by the federal gov, add a couple hundred (thousand?) more representatives to your list there!

I don't disagree that there are good laws as well as noble things that our tax dollars are spent on, but I refuse to take the attitude that because a few are good I'll accept all the bad.

2013-04-15 8:27 AM
in reply to: #4699188

Elite
2733
200050010010025
Venture Industries,
Subject: RE: 545 vs. 300,000,000 People
spudone - 2013-04-13 9:01 PM

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Yeah but here's the deal.  Special interests to both parties have the greatest influence at the *primary* election level.  So if a politician is elected these days, and he doesn't play nice with these folks, he'll be on the quick list to lose the next primary.  Which is less than 2 years away for a Representative.

When both parties do this, what do you think we get to choose from in the general election?  A couple candidates who will both do what their special interests want.

Yeah I know we could all start a campaign to write in a candidate (hey it's happened: Murkowski of Alaska did this to overcome the primary problem I just talked about).  But normally the inertia is too much to succeed.

 

Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago

Cars didn't exist either.  Liquor was soon to be illegal.  Electricity was barely in use.  You get the idea.  Different times.  Oh and your list doesn't mention the taxes existed back then but not today (like a tax on slaves).

 

Not saying it's a bad writeup but it's a persuasion piece; not terribly objective.

How about this: (1) all federal elections are non-partisan and (2) term limits 

2013-04-15 8:44 AM
in reply to: #4698884

Member
326
10010010025
Subject: RE: 545 vs. 300,000,000 People
"A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves" Bertrand de Jouvenel.
2013-04-15 10:57 AM
in reply to: #4700370

Master
5557
50005002525
, California
Subject: RE: 545 vs. 300,000,000 People
Brock Samson - 2013-04-15 6:27 AM
spudone - 2013-04-13 9:01 PM

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Yeah but here's the deal.  Special interests to both parties have the greatest influence at the *primary* election level.  So if a politician is elected these days, and he doesn't play nice with these folks, he'll be on the quick list to lose the next primary.  Which is less than 2 years away for a Representative.

When both parties do this, what do you think we get to choose from in the general election?  A couple candidates who will both do what their special interests want.

Yeah I know we could all start a campaign to write in a candidate (hey it's happened: Murkowski of Alaska did this to overcome the primary problem I just talked about).  But normally the inertia is too much to succeed.

 

Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago

Cars didn't exist either.  Liquor was soon to be illegal.  Electricity was barely in use.  You get the idea.  Different times.  Oh and your list doesn't mention the taxes existed back then but not today (like a tax on slaves).

 

Not saying it's a bad writeup but it's a persuasion piece; not terribly objective.

How about this: (1) all federal elections are non-partisan and (2) term limits 

(2) would do more than (1) I think.  You can make an election "non-partisan" but people have the right to freely associate with whom they want.  Parties would still get formed.  You might not see (R) or (D) on the ballot, but everyone would know who they are.

If you have term limits then Congress becomes less of the clubhouse that it is today with all its seniority rules and hoops to jump through to get on the various committees where the real power is.

2013-04-15 12:34 PM
in reply to: #4700687

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: 545 vs. 300,000,000 People
spudone - 2013-04-15 10:57 AM
Brock Samson - 2013-04-15 6:27 AM
spudone - 2013-04-13 9:01 PM

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Yeah but here's the deal.  Special interests to both parties have the greatest influence at the *primary* election level.  So if a politician is elected these days, and he doesn't play nice with these folks, he'll be on the quick list to lose the next primary.  Which is less than 2 years away for a Representative.

When both parties do this, what do you think we get to choose from in the general election?  A couple candidates who will both do what their special interests want.

Yeah I know we could all start a campaign to write in a candidate (hey it's happened: Murkowski of Alaska did this to overcome the primary problem I just talked about).  But normally the inertia is too much to succeed.

 

Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago

Cars didn't exist either.  Liquor was soon to be illegal.  Electricity was barely in use.  You get the idea.  Different times.  Oh and your list doesn't mention the taxes existed back then but not today (like a tax on slaves).

 

Not saying it's a bad writeup but it's a persuasion piece; not terribly objective.

How about this: (1) all federal elections are non-partisan and (2) term limits 

(2) would do more than (1) I think.  You can make an election "non-partisan" but people have the right to freely associate with whom they want.  Parties would still get formed.  You might not see (R) or (D) on the ballot, but everyone would know who they are.

If you have term limits then Congress becomes less of the clubhouse that it is today with all its seniority rules and hoops to jump through to get on the various committees where the real power is.

I agree on the non-partisan part.  In Nebraska we have a Unicameral with all "non-partisan" legislatures, but there's no question that everyone knows exactly which party each candidate is in when they're running.

I also think term limits are a double edged sword because there are obviously old crusty politicians in both parties that we would all like to get out of there, but then when you get somebody who you really like and genuinely puts the people first (ok, maybe this doesn't really exist) then he gets thrown out too.



New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » 545 vs. 300,000,000 People Rss Feed