General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Cycling Safety - Would You Use This? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 3
 
 
Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?
OptionResults
YES5 Votes - [10.2%]
NO44 Votes - [89.8%]

2014-10-01 8:25 AM
in reply to: donw

User image


12

Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?
Hi donw, thanks for the feedback! Could you see it being useful in any situation, such as if you were in a larger group training ride, or as a "standby" service you could call if you're stranded?

Stay safe out there, cheers.


2014-10-01 8:37 AM
in reply to: donw

User image

Champion
9407
500020002000100100100100
Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?
Originally posted by donw

No I wouldn't use this service. In addition to cycling for sport I commute by bicycle and I'm interested in bicycle advocacy and the promotion of cycling as a healthy, convenient and environmentally friendly transportation option. I don't like the message this sends . if I believed that a vehicle escort were necessary it would be time for me to give up cycling.
Don


Agreed; I would much rather see effort put into cycling trains and money/effort put into protected bike lanes, bike lanes, secure bike parking located at transit hubs, bike racks on buses, etc.

A support car for a cyclist on a training ride seems like a waste of time and resources to me.

Shane
2014-10-01 8:54 AM
in reply to: donw

User image

Master
2406
2000100100100100
Bellevue, WA
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?

Originally posted by donw No I wouldn't use this service. In addition to cycling for sport I commute by bicycle and I'm interested in bicycle advocacy and the promotion of cycling as a healthy, convenient and environmentally friendly transportation option. I don't like the message this sends . if I believed that a vehicle escort were necessary it would be time for me to give up cycling. Don

I agree that this sends entirely the wrong message. Further, I fully expect that the type of driver who is already annoyed about having to share the road with cyclists is going to go from annoyed to downright angry when having to deal with escort cars. Legal or not doesn't matter.

2014-10-01 8:54 AM
in reply to: Guest

User image

Champion
7821
50002000500100100100
Brooklyn, NY
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?
Assuming that it is actually free and as easy to use as the OP says, I would consider using it for long training rides 2-3 hours or more). I usually go on most of my long rides solo. I know lots of cyclists here in NYC that don't own cars. Getting home after an accident or serious mechanical on a long ride up into NJ or upstate can take hours and end up being a huge headache.
2014-10-01 9:05 AM
in reply to: gsmacleod

User image

Extreme Veteran
1190
1000100252525
Silicon Valley
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?
Originally posted by gsmacleod

Originally posted by donw

No I wouldn't use this service. In addition to cycling for sport I commute by bicycle and I'm interested in bicycle advocacy and the promotion of cycling as a healthy, convenient and environmentally friendly transportation option. I don't like the message this sends . if I believed that a vehicle escort were necessary it would be time for me to give up cycling.
Don


Agreed; I would much rather see effort put into cycling trains and money/effort put into protected bike lanes, bike lanes, secure bike parking located at transit hubs, bike racks on buses, etc.

A support car for a cyclist on a training ride seems like a waste of time and resources to me.

Shane

Shane while I agree that efforts put in to things like protected bike lanes would be great, I think you are comparing apples and umbrellas here. First this idea is a private enterprise and the suggestions you have would need to be publicly funded. Even in a town with an inordinately large cycling population per capita I don't think there is any political will to do such things. We do have a lot of bike lanes which are NEVER swept. There are lots of places where they are so full of crap you have to ride in the road.

Second, there are a lot of roads where it is geographically impossible to put in bike lanes. The road I was hit on is a perfect example. It is scenic with a nice mix of hills. It is also a small road with one lane each direction. Now I could chose to not ride this road except it is the route used by all the tri events in town.

As I stated earlier, having been hit by a car and left in the middle of the road I have a different perspective. I would use the service, Not on every ride of course, but I would not hesitate to use a free service to keep myself safe.
2014-10-01 9:17 AM
in reply to: Guest

User image

Master
2406
2000100100100100
Bellevue, WA
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?

Yeah, "we can't keep up with demand" is true.  I really don't see how this business idea scales to any size, especially involving "free to the cyclists".  Escorted group rides, maybe, but not the one or two riders I see all over the Seattle area every Saturday and Sunday.  I can't see having an advertising wrapped car following any real percentage of them.

Thus there will be a lot of cyclists wanted free escorted rides (the top end of the funnel) and only a few drivers available (little end of the funnel).  So you'd have to start scheduling group rides on weekends.  And that may work for some people, and may not.  But having a business that has escorted group rides is not the same business as on-demand vehicle escort service. 

Any time you get N cyclists wanting free escorts and have N-1 drivers available, that Nth cyclist is going to lose out.  Swagon becomes hit-or-miss, first caller wins service, kind of like Uber which is not free.

The other problem is that my rides are a mix of roads, bike lanes, shoulders, multi-use-paths, "no vehicles allowed", cut-through-the-park, etc.  No cars can follow me on my route.  So I have to change my route to be escorted. Yuck.

 



2014-10-01 9:21 AM
in reply to: 0

User image

Master
2406
2000100100100100
Bellevue, WA
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?

Originally posted by Stuartap As I stated earlier, having been hit by a car and left in the middle of the road I have a different perspective. I would use the service, Not on every ride of course, but I would not hesitate to use a free service to keep myself safe.

This is my point.  Stuart when you're going on your long Saturday training ride in the country, you're going to use up a Swagon driver for several hours or you're going to be going with the pre-arranged group.  There aren't enough drivers for everyone who wants to keep themselves safe via a free service.

Free-for-the-users, paid-by-the-advertisers works for Google.  This isn't that.



Edited by brucemorgan 2014-10-01 9:22 AM
2014-10-01 9:54 AM
in reply to: brucemorgan

User image

Extreme Veteran
1190
1000100252525
Silicon Valley
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?
Originally posted by brucemorgan

Originally posted by Stuartap As I stated earlier, having been hit by a car and left in the middle of the road I have a different perspective. I would use the service, Not on every ride of course, but I would not hesitate to use a free service to keep myself safe.

This is my point.  Stuart when you're going on your long Saturday training ride in the country, you're going to use up a Swagon driver for several hours or you're going to be going with the pre-arranged group.  There aren't enough drivers for everyone who wants to keep themselves safe via a free service.

Free-for-the-users, paid-by-the-advertisers works for Google.  This isn't that.



Bruce if that is the case and they can't both keep up with demand and keep the service free then the enterprise will fail. That's the way things work in business. But if the poll above is accurate and most people will not use it, then I don't see them running out of drivers.

The question posed was, would I use it. My answer is yes. If it's not available or if it fails for the reasons you cite, then nobody uses it. I'm not trying to prop this company up, simply stating that I would use it if it was available and free.

As for this not being Google, I can tell you there are plenty of businesses a micro-fraction of the size of Google that survive on advertising revenue. I don't if this one will survive but I for one like the idea.
2014-10-01 10:17 AM
in reply to: TriDadinAsheville

User image

Champion
7036
5000200025
Sarasota, FL
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?

Originally posted by TriDadinAsheville I was thinking the same thing. When I was IM training this summer, it would've been nice to have had all my nutrition needed with me, instead of having to stop at gas stations to buy more water 2-3x. I'd have probably drank more if I didn't have to do that. Again, with the caveat of it being as simple and free as is being implied.

 

From what I read on their website, providing nutrition was part of the 'premium' membership. 

Mark

2014-10-01 10:33 AM
in reply to: Stuartap

User image

Expert
3126
2000100010025
Boise, ID
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?

 

I am trying to imagine a situation where I might use this and I am not coming up with much.

 

1. Big group ride 40-60 riders: It is hard to keep a group this big together anyway. We did a century last weekend with around 50 guys and by mile 35 it was pretty well blown up into different groups. I suppose the sag portion could work in this situation, but as far as the escort service goes it really wouldn't work. Also a big group like that is already hard enough for a car to pass, adding an escort car will only make it worse and anger drivers further.

 

2. Weekly LBS rides. Usually 10-30 people. I could see a sag being helpful here as an escort. We tend to stick together a little better in these smaller rides so an escort would be nice. But I can't get past the fact that it will make drivers more angry than they already are when they see us. We typically wear the kit of our LBS on these rides, when I wear the kit I tend to behave a little better (slower to issue the "bird") because I want to be a good example of a cyclist and I don't want to stir up animosity toward my fellow cyclists or my LBS, no matter how correct I am or how much right I have to the road. I envision angry calls to the LBS from people who had to go around an escort vehicle on one of our rides.

 

3. Long solo rides for IM training. I could see it being useful here mostly for the escort portion. I have been spoiled with lots of group riding lately, makes me feel even more vulnerable when I am out by myself. I took a riding buddy with me on most of my centuries while training for my IM this year. The company was nice but also he could call my wife if I got nailed by a car. 

The problem I see is no one wants to drive around for 6 hours at 18mph following a cyclist. Another problem is I kind of enjoy the solitude of a long ride, I would feel rushed and/or pushed by having a car 20 feet behind me. Also I am thinking if I was the driver I would be pretty dang bored by hour 3, so out comes the cell phone... games, pandora, texting, etc. all 20-30 feet behind a cyclist. Destroys the idea of an escort car if the escort driver gets distracted and runs over the cyclist. 

 

I appreciate the ambition and the idea, it does sound nice to have a car buffer between me and the other cars on the road. I am just not sure the logistics work and if they do I am not sure it is worth the added angst it will cause other drivers. Good for you OP for trying out a new idea and figuring out how to make it work. I hope it works out for you and that it doesn't damage the "relationship" between drivers and riders.

 

I really think the best way to get drivers to give us more space is to get those drivers on a bike. If my wife ever becomes president she is going to force everyone to ride on a busy road at least a couple times so they understand how it feels and how dangerous it is when a car buzzes a cyclist. One can dream...

2014-10-01 12:01 PM
in reply to: Aarondb4

User image

Alpharetta, Georgia
Bronze member
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?

Originally posted by Aarondb4

 

The problem I see is no one wants to drive around for 6 hours at 18mph following a cyclist. Another problem is I kind of enjoy the solitude of a long ride, I would feel rushed and/or pushed by having a car 20 feet behind me. Also I am thinking if I was the driver I would be pretty dang bored by hour 3, so out comes the cell phone... games, pandora, texting, etc. all 20-30 feet behind a cyclist. Destroys the idea of an escort car if the escort driver gets distracted and runs over the cyclist. 

Fantastic points.



2014-10-01 12:44 PM
in reply to: Swagon

User image

Master
2094
2000252525
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?
I think the "Macho" aspect might keep some people from using the service but I know a few girls that really don't feel safe riding alone. They like to have guys ride with them but also feel like they slow the guys down. I personally would prefer my wife having an escort when she goes for long rides without me. I also wouldn't mind paying for the service if it was reasonable.
2014-10-01 1:10 PM
in reply to: Stuartap

User image

Veteran
495
100100100100252525
Calgary
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?
Originally posted by Stuartap

Originally posted by gsmacleod

Originally posted by donw

No I wouldn't use this service. In addition to cycling for sport I commute by bicycle and I'm interested in bicycle advocacy and the promotion of cycling as a healthy, convenient and environmentally friendly transportation option. I don't like the message this sends . if I believed that a vehicle escort were necessary it would be time for me to give up cycling.
Don


Agreed; I would much rather see effort put into cycling trains and money/effort put into protected bike lanes, bike lanes, secure bike parking located at transit hubs, bike racks on buses, etc.

A support car for a cyclist on a training ride seems like a waste of time and resources to me.

Shane

Shane while I agree that efforts put in to things like protected bike lanes would be great, I think you are comparing apples and umbrellas here. First this idea is a private enterprise and the suggestions you have would need to be publicly funded. Even in a town with an inordinately large cycling population per capita I don't think there is any political will to do such things. We do have a lot of bike lanes which are NEVER swept. There are lots of places where they are so full of crap you have to ride in the road.

Second, there are a lot of roads where it is geographically impossible to put in bike lanes. The road I was hit on is a perfect example. It is scenic with a nice mix of hills. It is also a small road with one lane each direction. Now I could chose to not ride this road except it is the route used by all the tri events in town.

As I stated earlier, having been hit by a car and left in the middle of the road I have a different perspective. I would use the service, Not on every ride of course, but I would not hesitate to use a free service to keep myself safe.


In general, I believe that it's worthwhile to encourage more people to ride bicycles. The things that Shane is talking about will encourage less confident cyclists to get on their bikes and ride for transportation and recreation. A vehicle escort service sends the message that cycling is exclusive, expensive and dangerous.

I think it's incumbent on people that ride for sport & training to develop a certain level of proficiency and confidence so that they can ride on a variety of roads. However - I do get the impression that the cycling environment where I live (while far from perfect) is better than some of the areas where other posters live. I would choose to quit riding or avoid situations that I feel are truly dangerours before I would use this service.
2014-10-01 1:33 PM
in reply to: Aarondb4

User image


754
5001001002525
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?
Originally posted by Aarondb4

 

I really think the best way to get drivers to give us more space is to get those drivers on a bike. If my wife ever becomes president she is going to force everyone to ride on a busy road at least a couple times so they understand how it feels and how dangerous it is when a car buzzes a cyclist. One can dream...




I agree with your wife. I think every driving test should include a section where people navigate a busy intersection on foot and ride a bike to show that they understand how ALL traffic fits together on the roads. I also think that cops should have to spend rotations every year on bikes and on foot so they actually enforce laws when we are endangered. When I am queen of the world, it will happen!
2014-10-01 2:34 PM
in reply to: Swagon

User image

Champion
10668
500050005001002525
Tacoma, Washington
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?

Here's  one of the biggest problems I see:

On roads where there's a wide shoulder, the bikes would be able to be out of the traffic lane. MAYBE the car could as well. What happens when there's no shoulder? Instead of other cars having to pass a bike or two that take up, what, 2 feet of the lane (plus the 3 feet required by law -- as if...), now there's a slow-moving car blocking pretty much the entire lane. That car has now created MORE of a blockage. So what happens when traffic passes that slow-moving car? They pull back into the traffic lane because they couldn't see the bikes ahead of the car. Now it's a MORE dangerous situation.

2014-10-01 3:00 PM
in reply to: donw

User image

Pro
4578
20002000500252525
Vancouver, BC
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?

Originally posted by donw No I wouldn't use this service. In addition to cycling for sport I commute by bicycle and I'm interested in bicycle advocacy and the promotion of cycling as a healthy, convenient and environmentally friendly transportation option. I don't like the message this sends . if I believed that a vehicle escort were necessary it would be time for me to give up cycling. Don

You said what I was trying to say only better. Thanks.



2014-10-01 3:12 PM
in reply to: donw

User image

Extreme Veteran
1190
1000100252525
Silicon Valley
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?
Originally posted by donw

Originally posted by Stuartap

Originally posted by gsmacleod

Originally posted by donw

No I wouldn't use this service. In addition to cycling for sport I commute by bicycle and I'm interested in bicycle advocacy and the promotion of cycling as a healthy, convenient and environmentally friendly transportation option. I don't like the message this sends . if I believed that a vehicle escort were necessary it would be time for me to give up cycling.
Don


Agreed; I would much rather see effort put into cycling trains and money/effort put into protected bike lanes, bike lanes, secure bike parking located at transit hubs, bike racks on buses, etc.

A support car for a cyclist on a training ride seems like a waste of time and resources to me.

Shane

Shane while I agree that efforts put in to things like protected bike lanes would be great, I think you are comparing apples and umbrellas here. First this idea is a private enterprise and the suggestions you have would need to be publicly funded. Even in a town with an inordinately large cycling population per capita I don't think there is any political will to do such things. We do have a lot of bike lanes which are NEVER swept. There are lots of places where they are so full of crap you have to ride in the road.

Second, there are a lot of roads where it is geographically impossible to put in bike lanes. The road I was hit on is a perfect example. It is scenic with a nice mix of hills. It is also a small road with one lane each direction. Now I could chose to not ride this road except it is the route used by all the tri events in town.

As I stated earlier, having been hit by a car and left in the middle of the road I have a different perspective. I would use the service, Not on every ride of course, but I would not hesitate to use a free service to keep myself safe.


In general, I believe that it's worthwhile to encourage more people to ride bicycles. The things that Shane is talking about will encourage less confident cyclists to get on their bikes and ride for transportation and recreation. A vehicle escort service sends the message that cycling is exclusive, expensive and dangerous.

I think it's incumbent on people that ride for sport & training to develop a certain level of proficiency and confidence so that they can ride on a variety of roads. However - I do get the impression that the cycling environment where I live (while far from perfect) is better than some of the areas where other posters live. I would choose to quit riding or avoid situations that I feel are truly dangerours before I would use this service.


Don I understood Shane's point and agree with it but that is not what this service is about. Every rider of any proficiency would love wide, protected bike lanes that were clean and debris free. That is a public policy question that has nothing to do with this service..

This service is something entirely different and with all due respect, I don't think it has anything to do with rider proficiency. I was riding 450 miles a month when I got hit by a car. It had nothing to do with how I was riding and everything to do with an impatient driver not wanting to wait for me to clear a stop sign where I had the right of way. I can say with 99.99% confidence that an escort would have prevented me from getting hit.

Also I don't agree that an escort implies the things you ascribe to it. But for the sake of argument let's say it does. What exactly is the downside? Drivers who don't like cyclists are not going think even less of them since I don't think that's possible. If some people think that it means cycling is dangerous, then I say good. Let them think about a 20# bike vs a multi ton vehicle. I would encourage that.

Finally I can not disagree more with your last sentence "I would choose to quit riding or avoid situations that I feel are truly dangerous before I would use this service." I love to ride and would/will go to great lengths to protect my right to use the roads and be safe doing it. I follow the rules of the road and I expect drivers to do the same. If that means helmet cams fine. If it means harassing local law enforcement to step up patrols fine. If I can use a free service that might impact some, I am fine with that too.

I just got back from a ride on the same road I was hit on. I like that road and most drivers and cyclists are courteous and thoughtful of others on the road, be they on 2 wheels or 4. So no, I am not willing to give up riding there.

2014-10-01 3:12 PM
in reply to: jeng

User image

Member
1748
100050010010025
Exton, PA
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?
If I have a problem on the road I'll be calling 911. Anything short of that I'll find a way to make it home.

I would not use the service, I see it as more of a traffic hindrance which would upset drivers even more.
2014-10-01 3:22 PM
in reply to: Guest

User image

Master
2855
20005001001001002525
Kailua, Hawaii
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?
my issue would be having this "swagon" ghosting me on my ride, waiting for something to happen.
JINX
2014-10-01 3:32 PM
in reply to: mike761

User image

Champion
7036
5000200025
Sarasota, FL
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?

Just a marketing scheme playing off the 'ride safety' sentiment.  Not a sustainable business model on its own, just ploy to sell you 'premium memberships' and the opportunity for them to sell their client list to their ad sponsors. 

The real kicker for me was the solitiation of 'sponsorships' for their proposed ride app.  No thanks.

Mark

 

2014-10-01 7:29 PM
in reply to: Stuartap

User image

Veteran
495
100100100100252525
Calgary
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?
Originally posted by Stuartap

Originally posted by donw

Originally posted by Stuartap

Originally posted by gsmacleod

Originally posted by donw

No I wouldn't use this service. In addition to cycling for sport I commute by bicycle and I'm interested in bicycle advocacy and the promotion of cycling as a healthy, convenient and environmentally friendly transportation option. I don't like the message this sends . if I believed that a vehicle escort were necessary it would be time for me to give up cycling.
Don


Agreed; I would much rather see effort put into cycling trains and money/effort put into protected bike lanes, bike lanes, secure bike parking located at transit hubs, bike racks on buses, etc.

A support car for a cyclist on a training ride seems like a waste of time and resources to me.

Shane

Shane while I agree that efforts put in to things like protected bike lanes would be great, I think you are comparing apples and umbrellas here. First this idea is a private enterprise and the suggestions you have would need to be publicly funded. Even in a town with an inordinately large cycling population per capita I don't think there is any political will to do such things. We do have a lot of bike lanes which are NEVER swept. There are lots of places where they are so full of crap you have to ride in the road.

Second, there are a lot of roads where it is geographically impossible to put in bike lanes. The road I was hit on is a perfect example. It is scenic with a nice mix of hills. It is also a small road with one lane each direction. Now I could chose to not ride this road except it is the route used by all the tri events in town.

As I stated earlier, having been hit by a car and left in the middle of the road I have a different perspective. I would use the service, Not on every ride of course, but I would not hesitate to use a free service to keep myself safe.


In general, I believe that it's worthwhile to encourage more people to ride bicycles. The things that Shane is talking about will encourage less confident cyclists to get on their bikes and ride for transportation and recreation. A vehicle escort service sends the message that cycling is exclusive, expensive and dangerous.

I think it's incumbent on people that ride for sport & training to develop a certain level of proficiency and confidence so that they can ride on a variety of roads. However - I do get the impression that the cycling environment where I live (while far from perfect) is better than some of the areas where other posters live. I would choose to quit riding or avoid situations that I feel are truly dangerours before I would use this service.


Don I understood Shane's point and agree with it but that is not what this service is about. Every rider of any proficiency would love wide, protected bike lanes that were clean and debris free. That is a public policy question that has nothing to do with this service..

This service is something entirely different and with all due respect, I don't think it has anything to do with rider proficiency. I was riding 450 miles a month when I got hit by a car. It had nothing to do with how I was riding and everything to do with an impatient driver not wanting to wait for me to clear a stop sign where I had the right of way. I can say with 99.99% confidence that an escort would have prevented me from getting hit.

Also I don't agree that an escort implies the things you ascribe to it. But for the sake of argument let's say it does. What exactly is the downside? Drivers who don't like cyclists are not going think even less of them since I don't think that's possible. If some people think that it means cycling is dangerous, then I say good. Let them think about a 20# bike vs a multi ton vehicle. I would encourage that.

Finally I can not disagree more with your last sentence "I would choose to quit riding or avoid situations that I feel are truly dangerous before I would use this service." I love to ride and would/will go to great lengths to protect my right to use the roads and be safe doing it. I follow the rules of the road and I expect drivers to do the same. If that means helmet cams fine. If it means harassing local law enforcement to step up patrols fine. If I can use a free service that might impact some, I am fine with that too.

I just got back from a ride on the same road I was hit on. I like that road and most drivers and cyclists are courteous and thoughtful of others on the road, be they on 2 wheels or 4. So no, I am not willing to give up riding there.



Yes they are different services. Philosophically, I support one and I have a problem with the other. Obviously some others feel differently. However, I'm sure I'm not the only one that feels this way - this might be useful information for the OP.

I don't mean to imply that getting in an accident means someone lacks proficiency. Just that it's important to have realistic idea of your proficiency and confidence. I'm pretty comfortable sharing roads with cars but there are still roads that I avoid, just as there are technical downhills that I would not attempt on my mountain bike. Fortunately that still leaves a lot of roads and trails for me to enjoy.



2014-10-01 10:51 PM
in reply to: Swagon

User image

Expert
2192
2000100252525
Greenville, SC
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?

I haven't read all the responses or replies, but personally I wouldn't use this.  I carry a flat kit, phone, and road ID.  That would cover pretty much every scenario.  Having someone follow me around at an excruciating slow pace for a car for hours would only stress me out.  Maybe this idea should be expanded to race support for areas with a strong bike racing populace.  

Now if I could pull alongside and exchange empty bottles for full and get a nutrition bag at set intervals that might be fun/tempting to use every once in a while.  Usually I just ride a loop and stop back at my car to refill.  I think non stop rides would be better.

2014-10-01 11:02 PM
in reply to: Guest

User image

Expert
2355
20001001001002525
Madison, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?
Never and here is why.

1. I always bring my phone, and ID with me
2. I never ride in such a rural area that a car does not pass for more then 10-15 minutes
3. 30% of my rides are with other cyclists
4. I ride to escape the city, this includes CARS and NOISE
5. I am plenty visible and ride only where there are good shoulders
6. I always have supplies I need, or am very close to getting them
7. There are only so many steps you can follow to keep safe before you go overboard, this is overboard
2014-10-02 10:16 AM
in reply to: bcagle25

User image

Extreme Veteran
1190
1000100252525
Silicon Valley
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?
Originally posted by bcagle25

Never and here is why.

1. I always bring my phone, and ID with me
2. I never ride in such a rural area that a car does not pass for more then 10-15 minutes
3. 30% of my rides are with other cyclists
4. I ride to escape the city, this includes CARS and NOISE
5. I am plenty visible and ride only where there are good shoulders
6. I always have supplies I need, or am very close to getting them
7. There are only so many steps you can follow to keep safe before you go overboard, this is overboard

Ben if I had your options I would agree. But the two most important on your list fail for me.

#2 - I don't have options of rural roads where traffic is that light. Such things don't exist in the Silicon Valley. Packing my bike in the car and driving some significant distances to find such a place is a very poor alternative.

#5 - The closest thing I have to lightly travelled roads generally have no shoulders whatsoever. While some would advocate not riding those roads that decision would have two consequences. First that would mean I only ride on busy streets. Second I would never be able to ride the route that the local tris here in town uses on races.

So with all due respect, I understand that your situation allows for #7 to be true, but that is simply not the case for everyone. Maybe that is the direction this company needs to take. I think most riders do as you do on items 1, 3, & 6. Likewise most would love to do #4 although that is not always possible. So maybe this service is limited to areas where rural, lightly traveled roads are not in abundance and wide safe shoulders are not the norm.

I don't really like being put in the position of defending the idea of a company I don't even know but I feel much of the negativity is based on the individuals personal situation. As a business man I see the value in the correct circumstances. Clearly it is not for everyone. Whether the economics work or the interest is sufficient to sustain it without so much demand that it swamps the system are questions the company needs to figure out. But the question posed to me as a rider was far more simple than that. To that at least a few have said yes.

I accept that this seems 'overboard' for you. Would you feel the same way if your only options to ride were heavily travelled roads with small or no shoulders?

Finally, in the interest of full disclosure, let me remind you that I have a very particular bias here when it come to safety having been hit by a car while riding. That required two surgeries, 8 months on crutches and 14 months of lost activity of any meaningful kind, let alone training. So I readily admit I start from a place quite different that most.
2014-10-02 2:16 PM
in reply to: Guest


36
25
Subject: RE: Cycling Safety - Would You Use This?
I get the impression from a lot of the replies that most here have not participated in a ride that had motorized support. I particularly get that impression from the replies that say these sag vehicles would enrage drivers further. I participated in a 3 day group ride across OH that had several sag vehicles patrolling the course. I envision this service being useful in much the same way. I wouldn't think I would need to have the car behind me (or my small group) at all times. But their presence patrolling the route would definitely help, especially during the more congested sections. Having a flashing yellow light on the top seems to assure drivers that this car is there for a reason and they seem more accepting of it.

The website said that the drivers would be cyclists themselves, and based on the way the business is set up, that would mean the drivers would be familiar with the routes you are taking. They would know when to get behind you and alert other cars by just being there. They would know when they've slowed cars enough on a fast rural road, to where they can pull ahead, pull off the road, and wait for you. This shows the other cars behind you how to safely pass you as demonstrated by the sag vehicle. They would know when they can pull ahead and stop at the next stop sign at a rural section of road and motion you through while looking for crossing traffic. I agree that I would not want the car to be behind me at literally all times. It would be more of a leap frog pattern, being present enough to warn motorists of your being there without breathing down your neck at all times.

In my 300 odd mile ride across Ohio, I had not one single solitary encounter with another driver. On solo rides, I have at least some small encounter with a driver EVERY time. It is my opinion that when they see these sag vehicles around, it makes them aware and gives the impression that its not just some spandex-laden fitness freak out for a sunday stroll that is slowing them down. It seems more official, and they seem more careful to lower their rate of speed and pass safely.

And guess what, the sag drivers were all soccer-mom type volunteer drivers or local do-gooder types that supported the cause. It does not take a trained professional car driver to perform the type of driving that will be happening. I really don't see it being such an issue that its a stranger from a driving ability and cycling knowledge perspective, but having some connection to the cycling community would be a huge plus.

Having said all of that, I think this service would be most useful for small groups, or large groups that have dispersed into small groups very quickly. There is nothing worse than a very large group that is difficult if not impossible to get around. On solo missions, it would seem useful, but I probably wouldn't bother someone to just sag for myself only....
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Cycling Safety - Would You Use This? Rss Feed  
 
 
of 3
 
 
RELATED POSTS

Cycling Safety Study

Started by xatefrogg
Views: 876 Posts: 3

2012-11-05 8:47 PM DabelDoes

Cycling safety question...

Started by Fat2FitAggie
Views: 1425 Posts: 16

2011-03-03 7:55 AM btompkins0112

Funny but important PSA about cycling safety and drivers

Started by Mirg
Views: 641 Posts: 4

2008-03-20 6:24 PM Aikidoman

Building cycling base using Turbo trainer

Started by DenisB
Views: 2430 Posts: 2

2007-09-18 9:01 AM Machiavelo

Anyone used/using the "Be Ironfit" plan for 05/06

Started by LSD
Views: 1312 Posts: 4

2006-07-31 2:20 PM LSD
RELATED ARTICLES
date : April 23, 2009
author : Team BT
comments : 0
Use these 3 drills to develop a feel of putting your head underwater and exhaling.
 
date : March 20, 2009
author : mikericci
comments : 0
This month's fun and fast training will help you improve performance and raise your metabolism so that you are feeling a bit hungry all the time and really burning up those calories.
date : December 3, 2008
author : dexter
comments : 15
What are rollers? How can rollers help your bike training? Learn how to use your first set of rollers without doing too much bodily harm to yourself.
 
date : December 17, 2007
author : AMSSM
comments : 0
Learn how to choose appropriate gear for warmth and safety. With proper clothing and exercise adjustments, you can enjoy a season of safe, effective and fun training!