General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Buying speed: The Virtual Pull-Buoy Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2006-11-12 9:41 AM

User image

Elite
2796
2000500100100252525
Texas
Subject: Buying speed: The Virtual Pull-Buoy

http://www.rooworld.com/2007/qroo2007.swf

Click on wetsuits, check out the new 2007 Superfull.

Now if I can just find some virtual roller-blades....



Edited by Bill 2006-11-12 9:43 AM


2006-11-13 10:44 AM
in reply to: #596984

User image

Master
2033
200025
Subject: RE: Buying speed: The Virtual Pull-Buoy
Wow... thats really cool. Would be neat to try before you buy. I wonder why no one thought of it earlier...
2006-11-13 2:17 PM
in reply to: #596984

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Buying speed: The Virtual Pull-Buoy
I don't like it. It seems like, just from the marketing language that the suit crosses the line from wetsuit to flotation device. And the USAT rules say if you use a "floating device" you'll disqualified.
2006-11-13 2:43 PM
in reply to: #596984

User image

Champion
11641
50005000100050010025
Fairport, NY
Subject: RE: Buying speed: The Virtual Pull-Buoy

Interesting question. I've sent a message to Charlie Crawford, Commissioner of Officials at USAT a message asking when does a wetsuit become an illegal flotation device in general and about this wetsuit in particular.

Given my past experience with asking Charlie for information, I expect something on the order of a full investigation including a double blind study in an hour or two. Say what you want about USAT and officiating, but I'm more than happy to pay membership fees as long as Charlie Crawford is on the staff there. 

2006-11-13 2:53 PM
in reply to: #596984

User image

Extreme Veteran
367
1001001002525
Lufkin (East Texas)
Subject: RE: Buying speed: The Virtual Pull-Buoy
You'd think that they would have done some research on it prior to releasing this line.  Doesn't make much financial sense to sell wetsuits that your audience can't legally use and from what I've seen QR seems to be on the ball.  Of course, the flip side would be that if they aren't legal, they should be really cheap by the end of the season.
2006-11-13 5:33 PM
in reply to: #596984

User image

Champion
11641
50005000100050010025
Fairport, NY
Subject: RE: Buying speed: The Virtual Pull-Buoy

The response from Charlie:

The fact is, as we both know, all wetsuits are flotation devices and many people wear them for that purpose rather than warmth. We have never defined how to build a wetsuit and what limitations on thicknes of the neoprene should be. We have allowed enormous growth in wetsuit design and manufacture by not having those restrictions on design. So, we know that wetsuits are flotation devices and that most people swim faster with them because most people need some help with body positioning during swimming. Wetsuits are our exception to the "no flotation rule" and use is restricted only by water temperature on race day.

All that may be more than you wanted but the summation is that the QR Superfull is legal for use as a wetsuit below the temperature limit outlined by Article 4.4 Wetsuits.

Hope that helps. let me know anytime you have a question and I will try to clarify.

Sincerely,

Charlie Crawford
USAT Commissioner of Officials
 


Also, if anyone from QR feels like clarifying, please feel free.

 



2006-11-13 6:49 PM
in reply to: #598096

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Buying speed: The Virtual Pull-Buoy
So it sounds likt wetsuit manufacturers have license to do whatever they want. Maybe I'll design a suit with nine feet of fiberglass and polyethylene foam built into the chest
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Buying speed: The Virtual Pull-Buoy Rss Feed