General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Running: Perceived Effort Versus "Real" Data Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2007-02-14 8:46 PM

User image

Expert
660
5001002525
Central New York
Subject: Running: Perceived Effort Versus "Real" Data
Just back from a tempo run. 7.4 miles. Pushed myself harder than perhaps I should have with my first marathon coming up in a couple weeks, but I really wanted to feel my legs spin a little since most of my running has been LSD lately. Worked up a good sweat and had myself in Z4 for most of the distance. Felt like I was running 8:15-8:30 per mile, but the Polar footpod tells a much different story. According to the data, I logged 9:00 per mile with Avg HR @ 148.

WTF? I am fairly sure the distance data is correct based on past runs. So why was I so slow? And why did it feel like I was running much faster (and harder) than I was? Am I that out of touch with my body, or have weeks of LSD conditioned me to plod along for big miles while sapping my speed?

Very mysterious. Suffice it to say, the real data trasmitted to my Polar HRM is a disappointment. No "running" from the facts, though. Just hard for me to parse the data to figure out what it means. Three months ago, I ran a half marathon at 7:47 pace. Now I have to push to get 9:00 per mile?

Something isn't right.


2007-02-14 8:59 PM
in reply to: #691190

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Running: Perceived Effort Versus "Real" Data

hard to tell with no logs to look at...

can you provide more info? years running, how much running you do per week, how intense, age, LTHR, etc.

2007-02-14 9:09 PM
in reply to: #691197

User image

Expert
660
5001002525
Central New York
Subject: RE: Running: Perceived Effort Versus "Real" Data
Grew up in the world of competitive swimming. Always had good stamina and cardio fitness.

Came back to running two years ago (at 34 y.o.) after gaining some weight and slipping into a sedentary lifestyle.

Decided last fall to have a go at my first marathon after a year which featured my first HIM and my first century ride. Just came through the last of my BIG training miles. Have completed LSD runs of 20 and 22 miles within the last two and a half weeks. The 20 miler was strong: 9:07 per at 141 HR. The 22 miler (last weekend) was a painful slog: 9:47 per mile at 143 HR. Weekly mileage went from 15-20 in November to 30-35 during the past month.

PR 10K = 43:58 (June 06)
PR Half-Mary = 1:40:57 (Dec 06)

Is it possible that big miles during the past four weeks simply have me gassed? I've not been ill. Good sleep. Good diet. But 9:00 miles tonight felt difficult and pushed HR up to 148-163.

Will taper restore the energy I seem to have lost?


Edited by Xan 2007-02-14 9:10 PM
2007-02-15 6:52 AM
in reply to: #691202

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Running: Perceived Effort Versus "Real" Data
Xan - 2007-02-14 9:09 PM Grew up in the world of competitive swimming. Always had good stamina and cardio fitness. Came back to running two years ago (at 34 y.o.) after gaining some weight and slipping into a sedentary lifestyle. Decided last fall to have a go at my first marathon after a year which featured my first HIM and my first century ride. Just came through the last of my BIG training miles. Have completed LSD runs of 20 and 22 miles within the last two and a half weeks. The 20 miler was strong: 9:07 per at 141 HR. The 22 miler (last weekend) was a painful slog: 9:47 per mile at 143 HR. Weekly mileage went from 15-20 in November to 30-35 during the past month. PR 10K = 43:58 (June 06) PR Half-Mary = 1:40:57 (Dec 06) Is it possible that big miles during the past four weeks simply have me gassed? I've not been ill. Good sleep. Good diet. But 9:00 miles tonight felt difficult and pushed HR up to 148-163. Will taper restore the energy I seem to have lost?
maybe other things were at play here but based on the limited info you provided I would just focus on tapering, getting those legs fresh and keep them losen up with short runs. make sure to sleep and eat well. Let us know how the marathon goes... good luck!
2007-02-15 7:20 AM
in reply to: #691202

User image

Pro
4675
20002000500100252525
Wisconsin near the Twin Cities metro
Subject: RE: Running: Perceived Effort Versus "Real" Data

Xan - 2007-02-14 9:09 PM  Just came through the last of my BIG training miles.

Have completed LSD runs of 20 and 22 miles within the last two and a half weeks.

 Weekly mileage went from 15-20 in November to 30-35 during the past month.

So, you're saying that your weekly mileage lately has been at or under 35 miles and within that you are doing long runs of 20-22 miles? 

A long run of 22 miles within a weekly total of 35 miles means that a single run accounted for 63% of your training for that week.  Are you following a particular marathon plan?  Are you still swimming and biking throughout this period or are you run training only?   Pretty low mileage to be attempting a marathon. 

2007-02-15 9:46 AM
in reply to: #691360

User image

Expert
660
5001002525
Central New York
Subject: RE: Running: Perceived Effort Versus "Real" Data
Birkierunner - 2007-02-15 5:20 AM

Pretty low mileage to be attempting a marathon. 



Agreed. There have been a few weeks in excess of 35 miles, but nothing in excess of 40 miles yet. The plan I'm using is basically a beginner's schedule from Runner's World Complete Book of Running. In keeping with the plan, I've limited my running schedule to 4x per week. The purpose is two-fold: Try to save my knees, which have been balky in the past, and leave some time for cross-training (presently a couple swims per week, and one easy bike ride.

I'm now in week 16 of an 18 week plan which basically looks like this.

1 Long run per week (Sat) starting from 8-9 miles and adding a mile or two each week. Step back to 2/3 every third week. So, 10, 11, 9, 13, 14, 10...

1 medium run each week (Wed) typically 1/2 of LSD at or close to race pace.

2 short recovery runs (Mon/Thurs) which are usually 3-4 miles.

I've had a few bad runs mixed in with mostly decent LSD at 9:10-9:40 per mile. I did completely blow up once in December on a 15-miler after a week of respiritory/sinus illness. Other than that, my only problem has been the first hints of ITBS in the last few weeks as mileage has reached a a peak. So far, that's not been terrible, and I've gotten along with ice, advil, and some new stretches.

I've run a recent half-mary at sub 7:50 per mile, so I was surprised yesterday that so much huffing and puffing only resulted in 9:00 miles. But perhaps I'm just gassed from mileage I wasn't really ready for? Hopefully, a couple weeks of rest and recovery put a spring back in my stride.

Thanks for the input. I'll certainly report back. Had visions of a sub-4 hour run, but now we'll have to see. 4:15-4:20 might be more realistsic.


2007-02-15 10:52 AM
in reply to: #691190

User image

Cycling Guru
15134
50005000500010025
Fulton, MD
Subject: RE: Running: Perceived Effort Versus "Real" Data

Some days are just better than others .......... don't sweat it that much.  And with only two more weeks left in your plan until the marathon you should be "tapering" anyways, so it is typical to feel sluggish this week.

If you can run a 1:40 half, then there is no doubt you'll be able to break 4 assuming you are smart with your nutrition on the course so that you don't bonk.

Remember, it's not any one run that makes or breaks your training, it is the combination of ALL the runs you've done.  Each individual run may only make up less than 1% of your total fitness.  So relax and enjoy yourself and toss the HRM out the window for anything other than just having another number to log.

2007-02-15 11:09 AM
in reply to: #691190

User image

Champion
6993
50001000500100100100100252525
Chicago, Illinois
Subject: RE: Running: Perceived Effort Versus "Real" Data
Well you are relying the polar to be acturate. I found them not to be all that accurate for me. For me I always found it too fast but I also run down the hill fast and that really throws it off.

Keep in mind most people I know find the 20 miler harder than the marathon itself because week you run the 20 miler you did 40 miles total for the week. That is why the taper is important.
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Running: Perceived Effort Versus "Real" Data Rss Feed