General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
CLOSED
 
 
of 2
 
 
2007-05-03 10:33 AM

User image

Champion
5345
500010010010025
Carlsbad, California
Subject: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
Question for all of the folks out there who have done a full Ironman:

How far did you ride before transitioning into your Long Run and what was your marathon split time for your goal race.

Extra Credit: How far did your ride before transitioning into your Medium/Long Runs.

For purposes of this post, Long Run is defined as a single run 16-24 miles and Medium/Long Run is defined as 10-15 miles.

This all assumes that your long run was done as part of a brick.

When listing your Marathon Finish Times, please list your AG (With Gender) at the time that you ran it. Or better yet, look up your Age Graded Time and post this also:

http://www.heartbreakhill.org/age_graded.htm

I know there are training plans out there that do not do a Long Run as part of a brick and this is not to suggest that there is something wrong with those plans. I also know that a lot of plans are time based rather than distance based, but since my plan is based on distance that is what I am looking for.

Thanks in advance for your responses

Edited by WaterDog66 2007-05-03 11:03 AM


2007-05-03 10:41 AM
in reply to: #787006

User image

Master
2299
2000100100252525
New York
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
Let's see...hopefully this is what you're looking for, at least in part.

I just finished IMAZ, finishing in 13:16:58. My marathon split was 5:24:00 (about 1/3 of which was directly into a 35mph headwind).

Longest brick: 5h45/45 mins
Longest run: 19.5 miles

Longest weekend: 4h45 bike Sat / 15.5 mile run Sun.

M18-24
42/92 at IMAZ in AG, 1009/2084 overall.

Edited by KenyonTri 2007-05-03 10:42 AM
2007-05-03 10:56 AM
in reply to: #787026

User image

Champion
5345
500010010010025
Carlsbad, California
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
Thanks for the reply

Did you happen to do a ride before your 19.5 mile Long Run? (If so, how long)

Oh, and your Age Graded time is also 5:24:00. (No Adjustments made for your age since you are not old yet)
2007-05-03 10:56 AM
in reply to: #787006

User image

Champion
9600
500020002000500100
Fountain Hills, AZ
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
OK, let me see if I have this right:

Longest Brick was a 5 hour ride followed by a 60min run, so that was probably about 108 miles with an 8 mile run. Personally, I don't think it is of any additional benefit to run more than an hour following a long ride. I only did it once. Other plans have more of them, but my coach isn't a huge believer in doing a lot of bricks.
My longest training run was 24 miles.
My IMAZ Marathon split was 3:30, my best stand alone marathon is 2:59. I'm 38.
Is this what you are looking for? Your post is a little confusing.

Edited by bryancd 2007-05-03 10:57 AM
2007-05-03 10:59 AM
in reply to: #787057

User image

Champion
5345
500010010010025
Carlsbad, California
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
yeah, I guess it was a bit confusing:

Was not so much looking for how long you ran after your long run, but rather, how long you rode prior to your long run

I agree that the risks far outweigh the benefits of a monster brick.

Thanks for the reply

Now I think I will go edit the post to see if I can make it clearer.
2007-05-03 10:59 AM
in reply to: #787006

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times

What conclusions are you looking to draw from the given data? I am just curious to understand the reasoning behind it…



2007-05-03 11:04 AM
in reply to: #787064

User image

Champion
5345
500010010010025
Carlsbad, California
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
Not trying to draw any conclusions, just want to see what other folks are doing in their training and what the results were.
2007-05-03 11:06 AM
in reply to: #787057

User image

Champion
5345
500010010010025
Carlsbad, California
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
Oh, and your Age Graded Marathon time is 3:28:06. (That was an awesome finish to a great race)
2007-05-03 11:09 AM
in reply to: #787081

User image

Champion
9600
500020002000500100
Fountain Hills, AZ
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
WaterDog66 - 2007-05-03 11:06 AM

Oh, and your Age Graded Marathon time is 3:28:06. (That was an awesome finish to a great race)


What does that mean, exactly?
2007-05-03 11:13 AM
in reply to: #787056

User image

Master
2299
2000100100252525
New York
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
WaterDog66 - 2007-05-03 10:56 AM

Thanks for the reply

Did you happen to do a ride before your 19.5 mile Long Run? (If so, how long)

Oh, and your Age Graded time is also 5:24:00. (No Adjustments made for your age since you are not old yet)


I did not do a ride immediately prior to my long run...just one the day before.
2007-05-03 11:19 AM
in reply to: #787084

User image

Champion
5345
500010010010025
Carlsbad, California
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
Age Grading Race times makes statistical adjustments for age and the suggestion is that race times can be compared regardless of age.

This all based on the assumption that somone in their 20's are at their prime and as they get older, they slow down. Put another way, your age graded marathon time is the time that you theoretically would have run if you were ~20.

Age Graded times also come with a statistical value that is probably not relavent to the Marathon split of an Ironman. It groups the times by percentile:

Over 90% --- World Class
Over 80% --- National Class
Over 70% --- Regional Class
Over 60% --- Local Class

Even though your marathon time was part of an IM, you still fell into the "Local Class" for an open marathon.

Your open marathon time is a 2:56:31 with a score of 71.8 which puts you in th regional elite class.




2007-05-03 11:20 AM
in reply to: #787006

User image

Not a Coach
11473
5000500010001001001001002525
Media, PA
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
I'm a little confused as to what you're looking for too.  I think you'll find very few people who brick a long run.  Or even a medium long run.  I think my longest brick run will be @6 miles or so.  Doesn't seem like very useful information to evaluate IM run times with. 
2007-05-03 11:25 AM
in reply to: #787105

User image

Champion
5345
500010010010025
Carlsbad, California
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
I am beginning to suspect that you are right that no many folks will brick their long run. Most of the plans I have seen seem to top out a brick run at ~ 1 hour of time or 7-8 miles.

Oh, and was not trying to draw any concusions about IM finish times.

FWIW: My plan does brick my long run but the ride is pretty short. ~ 10 Miles. I also have quite a few Medium/Long runs that are part of a brick. (Also a feature of my HIM Plan)
2007-05-03 11:38 AM
in reply to: #787102

User image

Champion
9600
500020002000500100
Fountain Hills, AZ
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
Interesting, although I don't agree that age grading is accurate. Men 30-40 are much faster at long distance events in general than men in their 20's. Just look at the top finishing times based on age group for both marathon and Ironman. If anything, the younger folks need the handicap!
2007-05-03 12:19 PM
in reply to: #787006

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
what plan are you following?
2007-05-03 12:25 PM
in reply to: #787233

User image

Champion
5345
500010010010025
Carlsbad, California
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
a plan developed by my coach.


2007-05-03 12:25 PM
in reply to: #787006

User image

Pro
3883
20001000500100100100252525
Woodstock,GA
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times

Bricking your Long Run is completely counterproductive. There is just no reason for it, no training value to be gained, and it just doesn't make any sense. If you brick anything long it should be your Long Bike. It's much easier to follow up a Long Bike with a true Brick run of an hour or so or just an easy 30 min Transition Run.

My athletes do a Long Bike on Saturday and Long Run on Sunday every other week to get used to running on tired legs. On the other weeks they do a Long Run on Thursdays to get a good quality run in on relatively fresh legs. Those weeks have a run of varying length following the Long Bike.

During an IM it isn't as much about the bike-to-run transition as it is about getting good quality workouts in for each leg. After the bike leg it is actually better if you run slower out of T2 until you get your legs under you and then settle into a sustainable pace.

2007-05-03 12:27 PM
in reply to: #787239

User image

Champion
5345
500010010010025
Carlsbad, California
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
I am begining to get the idea that posting this question in this forum was probably a mistake.

Was not looking for advise on my training plan nor was I looking for someone to come along and tell me that my training plan is all wrong.
2007-05-03 12:34 PM
in reply to: #787242

User image

Pro
3883
20001000500100100100252525
Woodstock,GA
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times

WaterDog66 - 2007-05-03 1:27 PM I am begining to get the idea that posting this question in this forum was probably a mistake. Was not looking for advise on my training plan nor was I looking for someone to come along and tell me that my training plan is all wrong.

I don't understand what you were asking......and if your coach has you bricking a Long Run then I might question his/her methods.

2007-05-03 12:39 PM
in reply to: #787250

User image

Champion
5345
500010010010025
Carlsbad, California
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
Since this I have requested this thread be pulled, I will be short:

I don't appreciate your snarky attidude nor your unsolicited opinions.

I have full confidience in my plan and my coach since both have provided acceptable results for me.

This is certainly a good example of why I won't be posting here in the Ironman Forum any more
2007-05-03 12:40 PM
in reply to: #787006

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times

Not trying to criticize/advise (I charge for that ).  As I mentioned on my OP I am just trying to understand what are you looking for? Many things work different for athletes; I strong runner would bike more, I stronger rider would run more, ALL will have to swim more, and the type and quality INDIVIDUAL sessions would be different. An experienced athlete will be able to absorb greater workloads hence will be training more, a top AG would do more sessions at higher intensities, etc.

Training by mileage is a bad idea because for instance a fast runner will cover more distance in 60min than a slower runner. If you force the slower to run the same distance he/she will require more recovery from ONE session. Also as RM said the benefits obtained from a long bricks short bike/long run are outweighed by the negatives…



2007-05-03 12:44 PM
in reply to: #787006

User image

Pro
3883
20001000500100100100252525
Woodstock,GA
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times

My reply wasn't meant to be "snarky" as  you put it. You asked a question and as a USAT Certified Coach who has coached 10 Ironman finishers I feel more than qualified to answer it.

I re-read your original post several times to try and figure out what you were asking and the only thing I could come up with is that you are wanting to find out if doing a bike ride of some sort before your Long Run would help your preparation.

If I misinterpreted your question I apologize, but for the life of me I can't figure out why you would want to ride before your Long Run.

2007-05-03 12:47 PM
in reply to: #787264

User image

Champion
5345
500010010010025
Carlsbad, California
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
Well, your OP as well as other responses you have made in the past surely do offer advise and Criticism. (At least in my experience)

I can surely say that it is highly unlikely that I will ever be paying for your services as a coach not because I don't think you know what your talking about, but because I don't appreciate your delivery.

You know very little about me, my situation or my plan but seem free to offer plenty of rather harsh remarks none the less.
2007-05-03 12:50 PM
in reply to: #787006

User image

Pro
3883
20001000500100100100252525
Woodstock,GA
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times

I think you are getting way to worked up about this. You are correct we don't know you or your situation. We only know what YOU posted in your OP, and that is what we are basing our opinions on.

I still don't understand what exactly you are asking and what benefits you are trying to realize from your OP.

2007-05-03 1:13 PM
in reply to: #787297

User image

Champion
5345
500010010010025
Carlsbad, California
Subject: RE: Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times
Wow, sure hope that not too may people wander into this forum and ask a truely silly question.

The "Experts" here will surely jump all over that person (I have seen it happen more than once here) and then whip out their professional credentials to justify roughing them up.

No thanks
New Thread
CLOSED
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Ironman Training: LR - Finish Times Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2