General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Hr levels at Altitude vs. Sea level Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2007-10-30 6:46 PM

User image

Extreme Veteran
310
100100100
Colorado Springs
Subject: Hr levels at Altitude vs. Sea level
Does anyone know the approximate differences one could expect in heart rate levels while training in a high altitude climate vs. training at sea level?

I ask because my HR seems high to me, given my RPE, and I was wondering if some (not all) could be attributed to living in Colorado Springs (roughly 6200ft)

Thanks

SARGE


2007-10-31 1:03 AM
in reply to: #1030556

User image

Coach
9167
5000200020001002525
Stairway to Seven
Subject: RE: Hr levels at Altitude vs. Sea level
How long have you been in CO Springs? Have you trained for tri at sea level as well?

Typically yoru Max HR will be lower, but to run/ride at the same pace you had done at sea level will elicit a higher HR and a higher RPE. It's frequently better to train by RPE at altituded, but if you are living in CO Springs for longer than 2 months and have fully acclimated, just do some field tests ot get your training zones dialed in.
2007-10-31 7:03 AM
in reply to: #1030556

User image

Extreme Veteran
310
100100100
Colorado Springs
Subject: RE: Hr levels at Altitude vs. Sea level
I have been in Colorado Springs since 2003, but only training for 1 year. I have just recently begun watching my HR over the last 6 weeks or so.
2007-10-31 11:55 AM
in reply to: #1031038

User image

Coach
9167
5000200020001002525
Stairway to Seven
Subject: RE: Hr levels at Altitude vs. Sea level
AF_SGT - 2007-10-31 6:03 AM

I have been in Colorado Springs since 2003, but only training for 1 year. I have just recently begun watching my HR over the last 6 weeks or so.


Then there is no need for you to worry about your HR compared to sea level.

Is there something more specific you wanted to know about HR training that we can help you decipher?
2007-10-31 4:04 PM
in reply to: #1030556

User image

Extreme Veteran
310
100100100
Colorado Springs
Subject: RE: Hr levels at Altitude vs. Sea level
The reason I asked was because when I see other peoples Hr, they are significantly lower than mine. They tend to workout at lower elevations than than I do here in CO, so I was just wondering if my high HR could be attributed to working out at a higher altitude. I see people running at a HR of avg 120-130....I cant walk without my HR jumping to over 100, let alone run or jog and stay that low...mine tends to avg in the 160's most of the time when running, and I am not pushing myself, just an easy steady pace. Does that seem high to anyone? or is it just me?

Thanks for all the replies

SARGE
2007-10-31 4:24 PM
in reply to: #1032091

User image

Expert
1202
1000100100
Montana
Subject: RE: Hr levels at Altitude vs. Sea level
Hey, that is an interesting question. I hope you get some replies, because I am at 5400 ft and my heart rate while running is never less than 164.


2007-10-31 9:53 PM
in reply to: #1030556

User image

Veteran
111
100
Woodland Park, CO
Subject: RE: Hr levels at Altitude vs. Sea level

Hey Sarge,

I live just up the road in Woodland Park (Elev. 8500) and have been here 3 years.  Last year was my first year doing tri's and I've wondered about the HR thing myself.  I travel alot and find myself training at all altitudes.  Strangely enough, I've actually seen my HR HIGHER at lower elevations but the same RPE.  That one I can't figure out.  I can get my HR higher at the lower elevations than I can stand up here.  For instance, at sea level I can run with my HR in the low 160's, but if I run up here in the low 160's, the next thing I know is I'm getting Life Flighted out!

New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Hr levels at Altitude vs. Sea level Rss Feed