breaking 20' in a 5k (Page 2)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2009-03-25 2:28 PM in reply to: #2039366 |
Elite 4344 | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k I ran about 19:00 for a 5k once. Only problem was that the race was 10k. That fourth mile was really painful. My advice is to know your pace really well. Spend some time on the track so you really know what 6:25 feels like. If you go out fast and try to hold on, it is going to be unpleasant. Try to run each mile at the goal average, then kick to catch somebody on the last half mile. You will probably puke but that's ok after the finish. On recovery time, you won't even notice a 5k race if you mostly training for longer distances. On potential for injury, listen to your feet. If you can hear them, that is bad. Keep the stride the normal length and run light on your feet. Don't try to extend your stride or run so hard that your form breaks down. Can you do 20? Doesn't matter. It is a race and the objective is to go as fast as you can. You won't know much about pacing until you have done about 10 5k's. You can race 5k's every week or so til you master the distance and really gauge your race pace. TW |
|
2009-03-25 2:37 PM in reply to: #2039366 |
Extreme Veteran 1942 In front of computer when typing this. | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k Yeah, the Garmin pace thing can go both ways. Last 5K I ran I had it beep me at mile 1. My pace felt perfectly comfortable at mile 1 (was going for negative splits) and when the watch beeped at mile 1 I was at 6:20 pace. That set my race up very nicely and I thought "woohoo, I can do this...). Finished in 19 mins even but the course was actually 3 miles, not 3.1. Anyway, it can also cause unnecessary stress (e.g., "making" you start faster than you need to, or can slow you down by setting a predetermined pace. Personally I like the in-race feedback but can certainly see why you might not want that. My advice: warm up well...and do some strides in warmup to get you ready for the pace. And run hard. If you get a sub 20, great. If you get 20:01, don't be disappointed- its a great line in the sand to try and beat next time. |
2009-03-25 2:58 PM in reply to: #2039366 |
Extreme Veteran 617 | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k I would recommend keeping time as for me I have done 20:01 in my last Two 5ks~!! Both times I wasn't timing and thought I had already 'missed" breaking twenty, so looking back I felt like I could have made up that couple of secs if I had known how close I was! As for recovery, I was doing 5ks all fall (had just started running) and always felt fine/back to normal in a couple of days. Now though I have recently done a marathon and am still "recovering" 3.5 weeks later. So yea, bottom line I would recommend timing. And two,,, recovery shouldn't be bad if you have been running a decent amount |
2009-03-25 2:58 PM in reply to: #2039366 |
Master 2460 | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k Go for it. Sounds like you've got a great shot at it. What is there to lose? BTW - if you don't get there on the next attempt, but would likely to make a serious attempt at it, the guaranteed method given your current legspeed is to run more miles in training. For running, lots of base miles, and one speed session a week works wonders. My 5k PR while training about 35mpw, and 1-2 hard speedwork sessions each week, specifically aimed to run a fast 5k: 20:30. (This PR stood for the first 30 years of my life.) My 5k PR while ignoring any 5k-specific speedwork, and training exclusively for the marathon (this still included a hard speed session once per week, just longer intervals) - 18:30 at age 31. I completely skipped over the 19:xx time bracket (!) This took me an 18 week training schedule that ramped up to 70miles per week maximum (Pfitzinger's Advanced Marathoning). Not saying you have to run this much, but volume is king on running. |
2009-03-25 3:08 PM in reply to: #2039646 |
Champion 5781 Northridge, California | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k feldon - 2009-03-25 12:07 PM I have a similiar goal for the season. My PB is 20:30 which I hope to have as a distant memory in a few months. I think you can do it this season, but you'll be hard pressed to do it next week. It just seems, judging by your tempo runs, that you'll be in the 21:00ish range. But, like you said in your OP if you have all the stars align you might be able to do it. Good luck! But - why tape over the pace watch? If it were me I'd try to pace it evenly @ 3:55/km and make sure I was always on pace. Agree with all of the above. If you aren't solidly sub-7 for threshold runs, sub-20 is going to be very tough. First time I went for it...July of 2007...going out at 6:25 and hoping to hold it...I fell apart and had my only non-PR 5K of the last three years. But all you can do is try...you're not likely to hurt yourself...and you will at least get a check on your current fitness. No reason not to give it a shot...might surprise yourself. FWIW, my PR is 20:02 (last 5K, which was last June) and I'm "going for it" on April 19. I can tell you that the gains generally come harder the faster you get. |
2009-03-25 3:08 PM in reply to: #2039822 |
Master 1704 Charlotte | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k ATLrunr - 2009-03-25 3:58 PM I would recommend keeping time as for me I have done 20:01 in my last Two 5ks~!! Both times I wasn't timing and thought I had already 'missed" breaking twenty, so looking back I felt like I could have made up that couple of secs if I had known how close I was! As for recovery, I was doing 5ks all fall (had just started running) and always felt fine/back to normal in a couple of days. Now though I have recently done a marathon and am still "recovering" 3.5 weeks later. So yea, bottom line I would recommend timing. And two,,, recovery shouldn't be bad if you have been running a decent amount X 2. Last 5k I did in August, my first mile was 6:15 (perfect) problem was I missed the lap button and could not do the math in my head to figure out what my added time should been at 2 miles. Ended up with a 20:02 and boy was I pissed because I know I had two more seconds in me but I thought I had it. I will be going for a sub 20 in May after my half mary in April and this time I am confident I can pull it off (will have about 700 more miles under my legs this time around).
Edited by bgraboski 2009-03-25 3:11 PM |
|
2009-03-25 9:39 PM in reply to: #2039366 |
Extreme Veteran 657 | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k Try doing intervals with someone who is just a little faster than you. Here is a video of me doing just that. Run interval |
2009-03-25 10:04 PM in reply to: #2039366 |
Extreme Veteran 356 Firestone, CO | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k Go for it! I ran a 5k after only 2 months of running. I set a goal of 23' and ended up 21:05. Have fun! |
2009-03-25 10:08 PM in reply to: #2039639 |
Master 1826 | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k mrbbrad - 2009-03-25 3:06 PM [hijack] When did the apostrophe become acceptable to indicate minutes? For me it has always meant feet and " mean inches as in 6'6" for six feet six inches. I've seen it used on this site several times and at first I was confused by it. I wondered why someone was swimming for 60 feet [/hijack] I measurement of coordinates it is degrees, minutes, seconds .. so 49°30'00" N is a coordinate |
2009-03-26 11:53 AM in reply to: #2039366 |
Pro 3883 Woodstock,GA | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k Sub 20 was a goal for me for several years (as was sub 40 10k), and I always seemed to come up just a bit short. 20:10, 20:08, close but no cigar. I started doing forced pace intervals on the treadmill once a week about 2 years ago to increase my foot turn over. I broke 20' on Thanksgiving posting a 19:50. 6 weeks later on very little training I hit 19:35 and then at a 10 k two weeks ago my 5k split was 19:12 ( I was just in front of Coldfire ), and ended up with a 39:49 10k. Did I mention that I am 37 and have been running for years? I am convinced that the treadmill intervals are the biggest part of my improvement.
Go out and run just under the puke line and see where you fall, 5k's are a dime a dozen so I am sure there are a ton around your area to make an attempt at later on in the season. |
2009-03-26 12:33 PM in reply to: #2039366 |
New user 7 morristown | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k I don't know. For me if I was going to push for that 20 min mark I would definitely pace it. I found if I go out fast and die I die hard and lose a lot of (relative) time in a shorter distance like the 5K. Your tempo and zone 2 paces aren't too far off from mine last year and I ran a 19 in the fall. If you have a friend or someone in the field you know of that consistently runs around a 20 maybe try tagging on to them..that's what helped me finally get below 18. I'd say your only issue may be the lack of any zone 4-5, dare i say, anaerobic work. Since your race isn't until next weekend I'd try to get in at least one short track workout this weekend, nothing crazy as to not injure yourself though. maybe something like a 4 x 400 at 10k-15k pace or so just to get the legs introduced the the higher turnover. again this is what I would do so take it with a grain of salt...i'm no expert. |
|
2009-03-26 12:42 PM in reply to: #2039366 |
Expert 1123 Columbus | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k My first year back into running after a 15 year hiatus I thought I would easily be under 20. I was running 16's in the late 80's. I was WRONG. My first several attempts in 2004/5 were all out effort to stay under 21. In '05 I changed 2 things - my mileage base and my weight (by increasing my mileage and maintaining the same diet). I ran my first marathon in 05. In '06 I set out to break 20 and wound up running and 18:17 -all of my races are now in the low 18's. Carrying and extra 15-20 pounds in a race is a crushing blow. I don't know if you have that issue but if so - change it. Now in order to run PRs I need to keep the mileage base AND do speed work.
Edited by bruehoyt 2009-03-26 12:43 PM |
2009-03-26 3:53 PM in reply to: #2039366 |
Lethbridge, Alberta | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k I don't think you should worry about your pace during the race because, so far, you don't know what your race pace is right now. You may surprise yourself if you go out and just do your best. If you've done your best and don't make it, that's also good info and a great way to find out what your current racing and training paces should be. After all, racing is training too. Edited by Micawber 2009-03-26 3:55 PM |
2009-03-26 8:43 PM in reply to: #2039366 |
Veteran 210 | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k This thread has motivated me to get under 20. I did it in high school, but haven't since. My post high school PR is 21:45, so I'm not too far off. I'm racing a 5k this weekend so I'll get a baseline and see how long it takes to get sub 20. Thanks for the new goal! |
2009-03-27 6:44 PM in reply to: #2039366 |
Expert 1148 NW Suburbs, Illinois | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k Yes, go for it. And then report back to this thread and let us know how you did. As well as your final plan and how you executed that plan. |
2009-03-28 11:01 AM in reply to: #2039366 |
Veteran 298 Rockwall, Texas | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k i'm right there iwth ya. 21:30 is my pr and i wanna break 20. i'm sure you can do it if you are running in the 7s already for training runs. |
|
2009-03-28 12:17 PM in reply to: #2039366 |
Champion 11641 Fairport, NY | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k My 5k PR is 19'58" set a couple years ago. I didn't go into it wanting to break 20 minutes, I just wanted to see how fast I could run a 5k. I did have a goal that year of doing a 5k in under 20m 30s, though that wasn't the goal that day Here were the keys for me:
So in my experience, here's how you set a 5k PR: be willing to suffer, be willing to blow up, have a good base with some speedwork and go in wanting to find out just how hard you really can run for 3.1 miles. |
2009-03-28 3:09 PM in reply to: #2045738 |
Extreme Veteran 432 Pelzer, SC | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k marmadaddy - 2009-03-28 1:17 PM My 5k PR is 19'58" set a couple years ago. I didn't go into it wanting to break 20 minutes, I just wanted to see how fast I could run a 5k. I did have a goal that year of doing a 5k in under 20m 30s, though that wasn't the goal that day Here were the keys for me:
So in my experience, here's how you set a 5k PR: be willing to suffer, be willing to blow up, have a good base with some speedwork and go in wanting to find out just how hard you really can run for 3.1 miles. ^DO THAT!!! This if pretty much the way I approached today's race. I beat my previous PR by more than a minute. Not under 20min yet (I have :24 to go), but it got me a lot closer. Oh and running 20+ miles a week for a while helps too. |
2009-03-28 3:34 PM in reply to: #2039366 |
Master 2355 Houston, TX | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k all my good 5ks are done without a watch. I havent looked at the other posts, but do your quality runs pretty hard and keep the rest easy. I still say you need to recover over the 2nd mile if you you open up the first mile really fast. at Mile 1: comfortably hard at Mile 2: Working, but not dead yet at Mile 3: kicking with everything you got. Once I'm 30s past mile 2, I tell my self just a mile to go and think back to mile efforts and just put it down. |
2009-03-29 10:54 AM in reply to: #2039366 |
Master 1853 syracuse | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k Did some speed work today, just got back...: 400 warm up 800 @ 6:07/mile pace 400 recovery 800 @ 6:09/mile 400 @ recovery 800 @ 6:15/mile 400 @ recovery 800 @ 6:15/mile 400 @ recovery 800 @ 6:16/mile 400 @ recovery 800 @ 6:17/mile this gives me some major confidence going into Saturday. I was feeling real good, and never go to "suck it up" mode. My HRM totally crapped out, saying 244 BPM, which wasn't even close as I manually did it and I was around 180 when it said 244..... |
2009-03-29 1:09 PM in reply to: #2039366 |
Master 2355 Houston, TX | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k |
|
2009-03-29 1:57 PM in reply to: #2047078 |
Master 1853 syracuse | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k smilford - 2009-03-29 2:09 PM 400 warmup! I can't imagine only doing 400m warm up.
actually, I jumped rope for 5 minutes, stretched, than jogged 400..... is that better? I've never done speed work like this before, what is a better warm up?
thanks! |
2009-03-29 3:35 PM in reply to: #2046927 |
Champion 9407 Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k cusetri - 2009-03-29 12:54 PM Did some speed work today, just got back...: 400 warm up this gives me some major confidence going into Saturday. I was feeling real good, and never go to "suck it up" mode. My HRM totally crapped out, saying 244 BPM, which wasn't even close as I manually did it and I was around 180 when it said 244..... While I understand that you wanted to do some speedwork before your 5k, you want to make sure that you are not doing a workout just to do a speed workout. Overall, some specific concerns to consider:
Best of luck with your 5k attempt, you are probably close to being able to go under 20'. Shane |
2009-03-29 3:38 PM in reply to: #2047132 |
Lethbridge, Alberta | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k cusetri - 2009-03-29 12:57 PM ... I've never done speed work like this before, what is a better warm up? I'd be interested in seeing some good warm up routines too. Anybody? How much do you warm up for a 5k PR attempt, without using up too much? (Maybe we need a new thread for this?) Edit: cross posted with Shane. Edited by Micawber 2009-03-29 3:39 PM |
2009-03-29 3:44 PM in reply to: #2046004 |
Champion 11641 Fairport, NY | Subject: RE: breaking 20' in a 5k smilford - 2009-03-28 4:34 PM Once I'm 30s past mile 2, I tell my self just a mile to go and think back to mile efforts and just put it down. I'll also tell myself this: "You can do ANYTHING for one mile..." |
|