Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 7
 
 
2010-01-29 8:47 AM
in reply to: #2639451

User image

Pro
4824
20002000500100100100
Houston
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
I have to say I don't get the 'only in case of rape or incest'
If you believe it is a baby/life that does not change based on how the baby was created.
I have a friend who is a product of rape she is a wonderful wife and mother.

Having an abortion is continuing the cycle of pain and abuse.  A lot of women who have abortions don't just wash their hands of it and go on with life.  They are tortured, feel guilty, go through depression, have a higher suicide rate (I have read) then women who would have gone through with the pregnancy and maybe given the baby up for adoption.  There is an organization called Rachel's Vineyard devoted to helping women heal after having made the choice to abort. 

At the VERY least what I would like to see happen is women scheduling an abortion being allowed to view their 'tissue' on an ultrasound.  They should know what they are having removed and as someone who received an ultrasound at 10 weeks I can tell you it's not tissue.

Someone said you can't tell women what to do unless you are willing to raise the child.  Adoption is ALWAYS an option.  Yes, it is a sacrifice and the least selfish choice.

One of my best friends is currently 34 weeks pregnant with a baby she knows will not survive.  This baby has 3 major defects and of which can be incompatable with life on their own.  The doctors said she would never make it to the 3rd trimester and yet here she is.  When they discovered the problems with the baby at 24 weeks the doctor told my friend he was sorry he couldn't give her an abortion because it was too late.  This AFTER my friends midwife had called the doctor and specifically asked him not to mention abortion.  It is at this time my friend fired her specialist and went shopping for another.  The assumption made was surely this woman would want an abortion.

This baby is living inside her, kicking, dancing, hiccuping.  They have made the decisions to carry her until she goes into labor spontaneously.  When someone else asked me why she isn't inducing my comment was 'how could they choose the day their baby is going to die?'  They know after she is born, assuming she is born alive, she will have a very short life (minutes).  Their only hope as a family (they have 3 children) is that they get to say hello before they have to say goodbye.  She is measuring 10 weeks ahead because of extra fluid, she is living on an emotional roller coaster every single day but she is putting this in God's hands.  They gave her a less than 5% chance of making it to the third trimester and are now saying a 1% chance of being born alive.  This is what courage looks like.  This is faith.


2010-01-29 12:17 PM
in reply to: #2642058

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad

KeriKadi -  I have to say...

Those are two beautiful stories, Keri.  Thanks for sharing that.

Do you know the Now I Lay Me Down To Sleep organization?  They're a network of photographers who volunteer to create remembrance portraits for families who have lost children near birth.  Excellent organization.  Perhaps your friend would be interested.



Edited by dontracy 2010-01-29 12:18 PM
2010-01-29 12:27 PM
in reply to: #2642058

User image

Alpharetta, Georgia
Bronze member
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
KeriKadi - 2010-01-29 8:47 AM I have to say I don't get the 'only in case of rape or incest'
If you believe it is a baby/life that does not change based on how the baby was created.


I have always thought this too, and people look at me like I have two heads when I say it. Good to know someone else feels the same way.

2010-01-29 12:39 PM
in reply to: #2642011

User image

Champion
6962
500010005001001001001002525
Atlanta, Ga
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
wabash - 2010-01-29 9:35 AM
velocomp - 2010-01-29 7:49 AM
As for the quote above that it is just as elective a surgery as lasiks, I disagree.  It is more like Greg Lemond being shot by a shotgun.  The lead pellets may or may not have an adverse affect on his life.  If they do, insurance should pay for it. 


if Greg Lemond doesnt want to get shot, he shouldnt play with a loaded gun and should take all necessary precautions. 
if a woman doesnt want to get pregnant, she shouldnt play with a loaded gun either and should take all necessary precautions.
abortion as birth control IS as elective as plastic surgery.  there's no NEED for an abortion or plastic surgery.  they're WANTs. 
are you also saying that a child born out of a rape is incapable of, and has no chance of ever being loved by anyone?  could never grow up to be a loving husband/father/wife/mother?  is not precious in Gods sight?  that there's no way the woman who was raped could ever possibly love that child? even as traumatic as the situation is, that nothing good could possibly come out of it?  is it anyones decision to make to deem someone elses life is worthtless even before they've been born? 


Is that person YOU?  Are YOU willing to take care of that child when it leaves the womb?  If the answer is no, then it's a mute point IMHO.

I always find it funny that the same people that feel abortion is never an option are also not willing to adopt the children that result.  So if you truly feel that strongly about it, go start adopting.  I wouldn't even mind my tax dollars going towards that.
2010-01-29 12:52 PM
in reply to: #2642788

User image

Alpharetta, Georgia
Bronze member
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
Marvarnett - 2010-01-29 12:39 PM I always find it funny that the same people that feel abortion is never an option are also not willing to adopt the children that result.  So if you truly feel that strongly about it, go start adopting.  I wouldn't even mind my tax dollars going towards that.


Are you saying someone can't have an opinion that abortion is wrong just because they are not in a financial or life position to currently adopt? Only those who have adopted can hold the opinion that abortion is wrong/adoption is better? Do you see how this is a flawed logic?

There is no shortage of couples who are waiting, ready, and wiling to adopt so this argument is not particularly valid in my mind. Even if there were a shortage, it should not change the fundamental beliefs that people have that abortion is wrong.

For example, I don't agree with dog-fighting rings, but I'm not in a position to adopt all (or any) of the dogs who are rescued victims of the activity - in fact, most people aren't in a position to devote that amount of attention to behaviour training and such. But that doesn't mean I can't still have an opinion on it that it is wrong.

 


 




Edited by lisac957 2010-01-29 12:53 PM
2010-01-29 12:59 PM
in reply to: #2642011

User image

Master
4101
20002000100
Denver
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
wabash - 2010-01-29 7:35 AM

if Greg Lemond doesnt want to get shot, he shouldnt play with a loaded gun and should take all necessary precautions. 
if a woman doesnt want to get pregnant, she shouldnt play with a loaded gun either and should take all necessary precautions.
abortion as birth control IS as elective as plastic surgery.  there's no NEED for an abortion or plastic surgery.  they're WANTs. 
are you also saying that a child born out of a rape is incapable of, and has no chance of ever being loved by anyone?  could never grow up to be a loving husband/father/wife/mother?  is not precious in Gods sight?  that there's no way the woman who was raped could ever possibly love that child? even as traumatic as the situation is, that nothing good could possibly come out of it?  is it anyones decision to make to deem someone elses life is worthtless even before they've been born? 


What if someone is takes  all the necessary precautions and still gets pregnant?  Who decides what the proper precautions are?  Who verifies that they were taken?


2010-01-29 1:04 PM
in reply to: #2642788

User image

Expert
715
500100100
PA
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
Marvarnett - 2010-01-29 1:39 PM
wabash - 2010-01-29 9:35 AM
velocomp - 2010-01-29 7:49 AM
As for the quote above that it is just as elective a surgery as lasiks, I disagree.  It is more like Greg Lemond being shot by a shotgun.  The lead pellets may or may not have an adverse affect on his life.  If they do, insurance should pay for it. 


if Greg Lemond doesnt want to get shot, he shouldnt play with a loaded gun and should take all necessary precautions. 
if a woman doesnt want to get pregnant, she shouldnt play with a loaded gun either and should take all necessary precautions.
abortion as birth control IS as elective as plastic surgery.  there's no NEED for an abortion or plastic surgery.  they're WANTs. 
are you also saying that a child born out of a rape is incapable of, and has no chance of ever being loved by anyone?  could never grow up to be a loving husband/father/wife/mother?  is not precious in Gods sight?  that there's no way the woman who was raped could ever possibly love that child? even as traumatic as the situation is, that nothing good could possibly come out of it?  is it anyones decision to make to deem someone elses life is worthtless even before they've been born? 


Is that person YOU?  Are YOU willing to take care of that child when it leaves the womb?  If the answer is no, then it's a mute point IMHO.

I always find it funny that the same people that feel abortion is never an option are also not willing to adopt the children that result.  So if you truly feel that strongly about it, go start adopting.  I wouldn't even mind my tax dollars going towards that.


so what are you saying, that im a hypocrite because i havent adopted?
that abortion is best for an unwanted pregnancy because NO ONE wasnts to take care of him/her and that NO ONE will adopt him/her?  that because the mom doesnt want it, that no one else will?
we can barely carry out death penalties to rid us of our most violent criminals in this country.  yet we fight tooth and nail with such a strong agenda for the choice for women to be able to do the same to their innocent babies.
2010-01-29 1:09 PM
in reply to: #2642834

User image

Expert
715
500100100
PA
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
drewb8 - 2010-01-29 1:59 PM
wabash - 2010-01-29 7:35 AM

if Greg Lemond doesnt want to get shot, he shouldnt play with a loaded gun and should take all necessary precautions. 
if a woman doesnt want to get pregnant, she shouldnt play with a loaded gun either and should take all necessary precautions.
abortion as birth control IS as elective as plastic surgery.  there's no NEED for an abortion or plastic surgery.  they're WANTs. 
are you also saying that a child born out of a rape is incapable of, and has no chance of ever being loved by anyone?  could never grow up to be a loving husband/father/wife/mother?  is not precious in Gods sight?  that there's no way the woman who was raped could ever possibly love that child? even as traumatic as the situation is, that nothing good could possibly come out of it?  is it anyones decision to make to deem someone elses life is worthtless even before they've been born? 


What if someone is takes  all the necessary precautions and still gets pregnant?  Who decides what the proper precautions are?  Who verifies that they were taken?


so abortion is just another step in birth control?

we got PETA out there fighting against figure skaters wearing fur.  a ship with its own tv show featuring its fight against japanese whalers.  lawsuits against puppymills. the list goes on and on about all the people fighting for the smallest amount of animal rights. 
but we cant get it right on the human front.

Edited by wabash 2010-01-29 1:17 PM
2010-01-29 1:49 PM
in reply to: #2642834

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
drewb8 - 2010-01-29 1:59 PM
wabash - 2010-01-29 7:35 AM

if Greg Lemond doesnt want to get shot, he shouldnt play with a loaded gun and should take all necessary precautions. 
if a woman doesnt want to get pregnant, she shouldnt play with a loaded gun either and should take all necessary precautions.
abortion as birth control IS as elective as plastic surgery.  there's no NEED for an abortion or plastic surgery.  they're WANTs. 
are you also saying that a child born out of a rape is incapable of, and has no chance of ever being loved by anyone?  could never grow up to be a loving husband/father/wife/mother?  is not precious in Gods sight?  that there's no way the woman who was raped could ever possibly love that child? even as traumatic as the situation is, that nothing good could possibly come out of it?  is it anyones decision to make to deem someone elses life is worthtless even before they've been born? 


What if someone is takes  all the necessary precautions and still gets pregnant?  Who decides what the proper precautions are?  Who verifies that they were taken?


Or plays with a loaded gun and gets raped?
2010-01-29 2:24 PM
in reply to: #2642834

User image

Champion
7347
5000200010010010025
SRQ, FL
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
drewb8

What if someone is takes  all the necessary precautions and still gets pregnant


You have to have sex to get pregnant.  Don't have sex = No pregnancy.  Pretty easy binary precaution to take.  Unless you are willing to handle the responsibility of a child (regardless of how remote) then do not have sex.

(I'm of course ignoring rape here but it's such a small percentage of the abortion preformed that it really should be in a separate discussion)

Edited by TriRSquared 2010-01-29 2:25 PM
2010-01-29 2:36 PM
in reply to: #2639451

User image

Elite
4564
200020005002525
Boise
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
Interesting



http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/29/news/companies/mancrunch_ad_super_bowl/index.htm?cnn=yes&hpt=T2


2010-01-29 2:37 PM
in reply to: #2643137

User image

Pro
6767
500010005001001002525
the Alabama part of Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
TriRSquared - 2010-01-29 3:24 PM
drewb8

What if someone is takes  all the necessary precautions and still gets pregnant


You have to have sex to get pregnant.  Don't have sex = No pregnancy.  Pretty easy binary precaution to take.  Unless you are willing to handle the responsibility of a child (regardless of how remote) then do not have sex.

(I'm of course ignoring rape here but it's such a small percentage of the abortion preformed that it really should be in a separate discussion)


Don't the christians have some famous chick who got knocked up without having sex?  I seem to remember that is part of their whole shtick about preserving all lives, etc...
2010-01-29 2:49 PM
in reply to: #2643175

User image

Expert
715
500100100
PA
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
gearboy - 2010-01-29 3:37 PM
TriRSquared - 2010-01-29 3:24 PM
drewb8

What if someone is takes  all the necessary precautions and still gets pregnant


You have to have sex to get pregnant.  Don't have sex = No pregnancy.  Pretty easy binary precaution to take.  Unless you are willing to handle the responsibility of a child (regardless of how remote) then do not have sex.

(I'm of course ignoring rape here but it's such a small percentage of the abortion preformed that it really should be in a separate discussion)


Don't the christians have some famous chick who got knocked up without having sex?  I seem to remember that is part of their whole shtick about preserving all lives, etc...


matter of fact, i think she set a pretty darn good example for the rest of us by giving birth to her baby.  even though the conception wasnt from the man she was dating, happened before she was married, and was young also.
hmm.....
2010-01-29 3:17 PM
in reply to: #2641333

User image

Expert
1158
10001002525
Chicagoland
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
hrliles - 2010-01-28 7:36 PM One set of rules you can always count on to follow and you will be fine, it's in a book, maybe some of you have heard of it, The Bible, amazing stuff.  I beleive the topic of discussion is covered in this text.  Ten Comandments.  I think the damnest thing would be to get to Heaven and God introduce you to your aborted child, probably an awkard moment.  IMHO

I wasn't a big Tebow fan, but I am now.  And I love controversial discussions.

H


Wouldn't you be going to hell if you had abortion?  Unless you repent or something like that?  Or would God take pity on you for your "mistake"?  Would soldiers that kill others be in hell, too?  Yes it's in defense but you are still taking a life, right??  How about the police?  How about the guy laying out Kurt Warner in the playoff game?

This is a personal decision that should not be a matter of the government.   I am personally against abortion, I would not recommend it or advocate but it I also would not deny a woman's choice.  Shouldn't we spend money nurturing our families, building our communities, so the thought of aborting is not even conceivable.  Nope, we are too busy fighting wars, denying gays rights, bailing out multi-billion companies, spending millions on opulent churches and tv advertising, etc.   Pretty much what God said we should do in the Bible, right??

Another thing that maybe Don can answer.   The Bible is the word of God, correct?   Why hasn't God spoken since.  Why isn't he broadcasting on halftime at the Super Bowl?   I know this is silly and I actually believe in God but I really don't lend a lot of value to a Book when God could just open the sky and have a good talk to us.   When he does I think we just leave the strict interpretation alone.

I'm done rambling and going off course.  Thanks!
2010-01-29 3:21 PM
in reply to: #2643215

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad

wabash -

matter of fact, i think she set a pretty darn good example for the rest of us by giving birth to her baby.  even though the conception wasnt from the man she was dating, happened before she was married, and was young also.
hmm.....

Mary was actually betrothed to Joseph, and thus had a valid marriage under Jewish law.  Jesus is from the house of David through Joseph's line.  That's only possible with a legal and valid Jewish marriage.

Friday Catholic Factoid: The marriage between Mary and Joseph was valid, but never consummated.  It is still possible today to have a valid yet unconsummated marriage under Catholic Canon law.  It's called a Josephite marriage.  It's rare, but may be granted for various reasons.

2010-01-29 3:23 PM
in reply to: #2643292

User image

Expert
1158
10001002525
Chicagoland
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
dontracy - 2010-01-29 3:21 PM

wabash -

matter of fact, i think she set a pretty darn good example for the rest of us by giving birth to her baby.  even though the conception wasnt from the man she was dating, happened before she was married, and was young also.
hmm.....

Mary was actually betrothed to Joseph, and thus had a valid marriage under Jewish law.  Jesus is from the house of David through Joseph's line.  That's only possible with a legal and valid Jewish marriage.

Friday Catholic Factoid: The marriage between Mary and Joseph was valid, but never consummated.  It is still possible today to have a valid yet unconsummated marriage under Catholic Canon law.  It's called a Josephite marriage.  It's rare, but may be granted for various reasons.


Isn't true that Jesus had siblings?  Were these immaculate conceptions?


2010-01-29 3:25 PM
in reply to: #2643292

User image

Expert
715
500100100
PA
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
dontracy - 2010-01-29 4:21 PM

wabash -

matter of fact, i think she set a pretty darn good example for the rest of us by giving birth to her baby.  even though the conception wasnt from the man she was dating, happened before she was married, and was young also.
hmm.....

Mary was actually betrothed to Joseph, and thus had a valid marriage under Jewish law.  Jesus is from the house of David through Joseph's line.  That's only possible with a legal and valid Jewish marriage.

Friday Catholic Factoid: The marriage between Mary and Joseph was valid, but never consummated.  It is still possible today to have a valid yet unconsummated marriage under Catholic Canon law.  It's called a Josephite marriage.  It's rare, but may be granted for various reasons.



i had only heard that they were betrothed, not wed at the time of the conception.
but later the bible conveys that they had become married (or taken as husband and wife).

Edited by wabash 2010-01-29 3:28 PM
2010-01-29 3:31 PM
in reply to: #2643297

User image

Expert
715
500100100
PA
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
TeddieMao - 2010-01-29 4:23 PM
dontracy - 2010-01-29 3:21 PM

wabash -

matter of fact, i think she set a pretty darn good example for the rest of us by giving birth to her baby.  even though the conception wasnt from the man she was dating, happened before she was married, and was young also.
hmm.....

Mary was actually betrothed to Joseph, and thus had a valid marriage under Jewish law.  Jesus is from the house of David through Joseph's line.  That's only possible with a legal and valid Jewish marriage.

Friday Catholic Factoid: The marriage between Mary and Joseph was valid, but never consummated.  It is still possible today to have a valid yet unconsummated marriage under Catholic Canon law.  It's called a Josephite marriage.  It's rare, but may be granted for various reasons.


Isn't true that Jesus had siblings?  Were these immaculate conceptions?


he did have brothers and sisters.  (half bro's and sis's)
2010-01-29 3:34 PM
in reply to: #2643297

User image

Champion
14571
50005000200020005002525
the alamo city, Texas
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
TeddieMao - 2010-01-29 4:23 PM
dontracy - 2010-01-29 3:21 PM

wabash -

matter of fact, i think she set a pretty darn good example for the rest of us by giving birth to her baby.  even though the conception wasnt from the man she was dating, happened before she was married, and was young also.
hmm.....

Mary was actually betrothed to Joseph, and thus had a valid marriage under Jewish law.  Jesus is from the house of David through Joseph's line.  That's only possible with a legal and valid Jewish marriage.

Friday Catholic Factoid: The marriage between Mary and Joseph was valid, but never consummated.  It is still possible today to have a valid yet unconsummated marriage under Catholic Canon law.  It's called a Josephite marriage.  It's rare, but may be granted for various reasons.


Isn't true that Jesus had siblings?  Were these immaculate conceptions?


One of the gospels says that Joseph respected her virginity until AFTER Jesus was born.  He had several siblings, also called out in the gospels.  And in Jewish culture - marriage didn't count until you consummated it - you actually had sex after the wedding ceremony before the celebration while everyone waited outside.  Fascinating stuff.
2010-01-29 3:36 PM
in reply to: #2643215

User image

Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
wabash - 2010-01-29 12:49 PM

gearboy - 2010-01-29 3:37 PM
TriRSquared - 2010-01-29 3:24 PM
drewb8

What if someone is takes  all the necessary precautions and still gets pregnant


You have to have sex to get pregnant.  Don't have sex = No pregnancy.  Pretty easy binary precaution to take.  Unless you are willing to handle the responsibility of a child (regardless of how remote) then do not have sex.

(I'm of course ignoring rape here but it's such a small percentage of the abortion preformed that it really should be in a separate discussion)


Don't the christians have some famous chick who got knocked up without having sex?  I seem to remember that is part of their whole shtick about preserving all lives, etc...


matter of fact, i think she set a pretty darn good example for the rest of us by giving birth to her baby.  even though the conception wasnt from the man she was dating, happened before she was married, and was young also.
hmm.....


Was a safe abortion procedure available at the time of Jesus? If not, seems she did what she had to do, rather than making a choice........ I don't know the answer (but I don't like specious arguments, if the answer is no)

Edited by ChrisM 2010-01-29 3:53 PM
2010-01-29 3:36 PM
in reply to: #2643301

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad

wabash -
i had only heard that they were betrothed, not wed at the time of the conception.
but later the bible conveys that they had become married (or taken as husband and wife).

My understanding is that there was a multi-step process involved, and that when one entered into betrothal, one was married at that point.

Look at MT 1 10-20:


19 Joseph her husband, since he was a righteous man,  yet unwilling to expose her to shame, decided to divorce her quietly.

20Such was his intention when, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, "Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary your wife into your home. For it is through the holy Spirit that this child has been conceived in her.

Joseph was struggling with whether to divorce Mary when the angel came to him.

Of course, I agree with you about Mary as an example.  She is the prime example of what it means to say yes to love and life in the most radically open way possible.


2010-01-29 3:44 PM
in reply to: #2643316

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad

meherczeg -
One of the gospels says that Joseph respected her virginity until AFTER Jesus was born.  He had several siblings, also called out in the gospels.  And in Jewish culture - marriage didn't count until you consummated it - you actually had sex after the wedding ceremony before the celebration while everyone waited outside.  Fascinating stuff.

Mary remained a virgin throughout her life.  Jesus did not have siblings.  Those passages are better translated as "cousins" or "kinfolk" or "bros".

One confirmation of this can be found in John 19 26-27

26 When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple there whom he loved, he said to his mother, "Woman, behold, your son."
27 Then he said to the disciple, "Behold, your mother." And from that hour the disciple took her into his home.

If Jesus had a blood brother, he never would have done this.  According to Jewish custom, Mary would have gone to the home of the brother. 
2010-01-29 3:51 PM
in reply to: #2642718

User image

Pro
4824
20002000500100100100
Houston
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
dontracy - 2010-01-29 12:17 PM

KeriKadi -  I have to say...

Those are two beautiful stories, Keri.  Thanks for sharing that.

Do you know the Now I Lay Me Down To Sleep organization?  They're a network of photographers who volunteer to create remembrance portraits for families who have lost children near birth.  Excellent organization.  Perhaps your friend would be interested.



This organization has already done pregnancy photos for my friends and also photographed the Blessingway we gave my friend a couple of weeks ago.
2010-01-29 7:32 PM
in reply to: #2642058

User image

Elite
4547
2000200050025
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad
KeriKadi - 2010-01-29 9:47 AM I have to say I don't get the 'only in case of rape or incest'
If you believe it is a baby/life that does not change based on how the baby was created.
I have a friend who is a product of rape she is a wonderful wife and mother.

Having an abortion is continuing the cycle of pain and abuse.  A lot of women who have abortions don't just wash their hands of it and go on with life.  They are tortured, feel guilty, go through depression, have a higher suicide rate (I have read) then women who would have gone through with the pregnancy and maybe given the baby up for adoption.  There is an organization called Rachel's Vineyard devoted to helping women heal after having made the choice to abort. 

At the VERY least what I would like to see happen is women scheduling an abortion being allowed to view their 'tissue' on an ultrasound.  They should know what they are having removed and as someone who received an ultrasound at 10 weeks I can tell you it's not tissue.

Someone said you can't tell women what to do unless you are willing to raise the child.  Adoption is ALWAYS an option.  Yes, it is a sacrifice and the least selfish choice.

One of my best friends is currently 34 weeks pregnant with a baby she knows will not survive.  This baby has 3 major defects and of which can be incompatable with life on their own.  The doctors said she would never make it to the 3rd trimester and yet here she is.  When they discovered the problems with the baby at 24 weeks the doctor told my friend he was sorry he couldn't give her an abortion because it was too late.  This AFTER my friends midwife had called the doctor and specifically asked him not to mention abortion.  It is at this time my friend fired her specialist and went shopping for another.  The assumption made was surely this woman would want an abortion.

This baby is living inside her, kicking, dancing, hiccuping.  They have made the decisions to carry her until she goes into labor spontaneously.  When someone else asked me why she isn't inducing my comment was 'how could they choose the day their baby is going to die?'  They know after she is born, assuming she is born alive, she will have a very short life (minutes).  Their only hope as a family (they have 3 children) is that they get to say hello before they have to say goodbye.  She is measuring 10 weeks ahead because of extra fluid, she is living on an emotional roller coaster every single day but she is putting this in God's hands.  They gave her a less than 5% chance of making it to the third trimester and are now saying a 1% chance of being born alive.  This is what courage looks like.  This is faith.



I think everybody agrees in a perfect world, there would be zero abortions...unfortunately, we don't live in a perfect world. 
KK, you mentioned you have a friend who is a product of rape and she is a wonderful wife and mother.  That's a nice story, and I'm no expert, but something tells me that would be the exception to the rule.  I can't imagine a majority of women would be able to look into the baby's eyes and not be haunted by the scumbag who violated her.  How many men in this day and age would be up to the challenge of raising the seed of a rapist?  Again, I admire those that choose to go that route...but again, I believe it's the woman's choice to have or not have the baby.

I do think in the future we'll see less abortions.  It will come in the form of education, real education (not abstinence-only ed. which has been shown in study after study to fail miserably).  Better educated kids will make the difference.  More immediate access to birth control and morning-after pills which will prevent fertilization in the first place.  I see a better time coming.

As for your friend carrying the child to its birth/death...that's her call.  I am comfortable with her decision and happy Big Brother isn't telling her she can't do that.  Had she decided to end the pregnancy, I'd have no less admiration or sympathy for her. 

One more response to the statement where the mothers who chose to have an abortion felt tortured, guilty, depression, higher % suicide (which I'd love to see some real scientific study look at), as for all that, could part of the reason they feel so bad is that there are millions of people calling them a murderer?  Sometimes standing outside the clinics immediately after?  It seems to me the pain they're feeling isn't totally coming from just within their minds.

As for the Tebow ad, no problem, it's a free country. 



2010-01-29 8:41 PM
in reply to: #2642816

User image

Master
2946
200050010010010010025
Centennial, CO
Subject: RE: Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad

lisac957 - 2010-01-29 11:52 AM
Marvarnett - 2010-01-29 12:39 PM I always find it funny that the same people that feel abortion is never an option are also not willing to adopt the children that result.  So if you truly feel that strongly about it, go start adopting.  I wouldn't even mind my tax dollars going towards that.


Are you saying someone can't have an opinion that abortion is wrong just because they are not in a financial or life position to currently adopt? Only those who have adopted can hold the opinion that abortion is wrong/adoption is better? Do you see how this is a flawed logic?

So are  you saying that someone who is not in a mental, physical, or financial position to raise a child, can not have an abortion if the pregnancy was unwanted or more specifically forced on them? 

I just believe it is their business, not anyone elses.  (As noted previously, I don't agree with abortion but would never force my beliefs on anyone else.)   

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Tebow pro-life Superbowl ad Rss Feed  
 
 
of 7