General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Best ways to increase biking speed Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 6
 
 
2013-04-25 12:57 PM
in reply to: #4712761

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.

Edited by Fred D 2013-04-25 12:58 PM


2013-04-25 1:07 PM
in reply to: #4714973

Extreme Veteran
3025
2000100025
Maryland
Subject: RE: Best ways to increase biking speed
Fred D - 2013-04-25 12:57 PM

Fitness is paramount, but I never have understood why you can't work on both from an early stage?

Even when your fitness is just starting to build up, the aero benefits are worth focusing on (again in the context of this thread of getting faster, not necessarily in the lollygagging on the bike without a care in the world concept, and just enjoying the 'Zen' of it all.... that's for you out there Marc ;-) )

Fred (and everyone) just want your opinion on something tangentially related to this. Are you a proponent of the "train with crappy gear race with great gear" idea? I personally train with the best gear I can, without risking my expensive items like race wheels.

2013-04-25 1:18 PM
in reply to: #4714997

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2013-04-25 1:19 PM
in reply to: #4714997

Master
2946
200050010010010010025
Centennial, CO
Subject: RE: Best ways to increase biking speed
dmiller5 - 2013-04-25 12:07 PM 

Fred (and everyone) just want your opinion on something tangentially related to this. Are you a proponent of the "train with crappy gear race with great gear" idea? I personally train with the best gear I can, without risking my expensive items like race wheels.

X2  

To me it is important to be as comfortable as possible when I am going to make myself hurt.  "Better to enjoy the pain."  So I ride my Tri bike, I wear the most comfy gear I have, and I enjoy myself.  Within the financial means I have.  Same goes for running.  For example you probably don't need to carry water on a 5k run.  But why not?  Why wait til your shoes hurt to replace them?  Etc, Etc, Etc.

This is a hobby.  Enjoy it.

2013-04-25 1:20 PM
in reply to: #4712761

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2013-04-25 1:24 PM
in reply to: #4714997

Master
10208
50005000100100
Northern IL
Subject: RE: Best ways to increase biking speed
dmiller5 - 2013-04-25 1:07 PM
Fred D - 2013-04-25 12:57 PM

Fitness is paramount, but I never have understood why you can't work on both from an early stage?

Even when your fitness is just starting to build up, the aero benefits are worth focusing on (again in the context of this thread of getting faster, not necessarily in the lollygagging on the bike without a care in the world concept, and just enjoying the 'Zen' of it all.... that's for you out there Marc ;-) )

Fred (and everyone) just want your opinion on something tangentially related to this. Are you a proponent of the "train with crappy gear race with great gear" idea? I personally train with the best gear I can, without risking my expensive items like race wheels.

I don't train with "crappy" gear. It's somewhat different gear because durability becomes more important to me then. It's not as fast, but it still does what I want it to do in training as it's more about putting in the work necessary than achieving the best time there.



2013-04-25 1:24 PM
in reply to: #4714958

Champion
9407
500020002000100100100100
Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia
Subject: RE:
FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 2:51 PM

This doesn't say anything about when aero equipment begins to have an effect on speed.  It certainly is NOT at 12 mph (ground speed + windspeed) or thereabouts, which is what I think you're implying by this chart?   It would be very misleading to say so.

 



Well, since aero drag is determined by:

1/2 * rho * CdA * v^2

And aero equipment is designed to lower CdA, then it would appear that 10-12mph is the tipping point.

Shane
2013-04-25 1:25 PM
in reply to: #4712761

Extreme Veteran
3025
2000100025
Maryland
Subject: RE: Best ways to increase biking speed
I'll ride the gatorskins in the winter, but I tend to ride my GP4000S tires on a regular basis because they corner so much better. Although ST is making me think im losing time by ruining their aerodynamics and RR by riding them.
2013-04-25 1:28 PM
in reply to: #4714958

Not a Coach
11473
5000500010001001001001002525
Media, PA
Subject: RE:
FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 1:51 PM
RChung - 2013-04-25 12:43 PM

FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 10:33 AM

By the way, aero is useless under a certain (bike + wind) speed.  For me that's around 17-19 mph.  On a calm day, aero picks up significant benefit around 20 mph and really kicks into gear around 25-30 mph.

 

This doesn't say anything about when aero equipment begins to have an effect on speed.  It certainly is NOT at 12 mph (ground speed + windspeed) or thereabouts, which is what I think you're implying by this chart?   It would be very misleading to say so.

 

Actually, I believe it says that aerodynamics begins to have an effect on speed at about the time you establish velocity.  But physics can be terribly misleading.

2013-04-25 1:36 PM
in reply to: #4715032

Master
10208
50005000100100
Northern IL
Subject: RE:
JohnnyKay - 2013-04-25 1:28 PM
FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 1:51 PM
RChung - 2013-04-25 12:43 PM

FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 10:33 AM

By the way, aero is useless under a certain (bike + wind) speed.  For me that's around 17-19 mph.  On a calm day, aero picks up significant benefit around 20 mph and really kicks into gear around 25-30 mph.

This doesn't say anything about when aero equipment begins to have an effect on speed.  It certainly is NOT at 12 mph (ground speed + windspeed) or thereabouts, which is what I think you're implying by this chart?   It would be very misleading to say so.

Actually, I believe it says that aerodynamics begins to have an effect on speed at about the time you establish velocity.  But physics can be terribly misleading.

Yes, aero has an effect any time you are trying to go forward. The crossing point on the graph is only where aero resistance and rolling resistance are equal.

2013-04-25 1:48 PM
in reply to: #4715019

Subject: RE: Best ways to increase biking speed
Fred D - 2013-04-25 11:18 AM

Depends.

I ride my road bike with not so fast wheels and tires, but I often ride my TT bike with aero wheels and good tires/tubes.

In theory the 'ride heavy race light' approach is best, but life is too short and I only race rarely, so I like to enjoy my 'goodies' for more than just racing in general.

I don't ride the aero helmet very often as it looks a bit dorky, but I do practice rides with it on the Shiv from time to time.

 

dmiller5

Fred (and everyone) just want your opinion on something tangentially related to this. Are you a proponent of the "train with crappy gear race with great gear" idea? I personally train with the best gear I can, without risking my expensive items like race wheels.

LOL, go over to Fred's training log and check out the "crappy" road bike gear  

I am the same.  Use gatorskins, spoked wheels and road helmet for training.  Use HEDs, race tires and aero helmet in races.  I don't have enough $ for a full set of crappy gear and race gear 



2013-04-25 1:54 PM
in reply to: #4712761

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2013-04-25 2:21 PM
in reply to: #4715043

Veteran
629
50010025
Grapevine, TX
Subject: RE:
brigby1 - 2013-04-25 1:36 PM
JohnnyKay - 2013-04-25 1:28 PM
FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 1:51 PM
RChung - 2013-04-25 12:43 PM

FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 10:33 AM

By the way, aero is useless under a certain (bike + wind) speed.  For me that's around 17-19 mph.  On a calm day, aero picks up significant benefit around 20 mph and really kicks into gear around 25-30 mph.

This doesn't say anything about when aero equipment begins to have an effect on speed.  It certainly is NOT at 12 mph (ground speed + windspeed) or thereabouts, which is what I think you're implying by this chart?   It would be very misleading to say so.

Actually, I believe it says that aerodynamics begins to have an effect on speed at about the time you establish velocity.  But physics can be terribly misleading.

Yes, aero has an effect any time you are trying to go forward. The crossing point on the graph is only where aero resistance and rolling resistance are equal.

Yet anyone who rides knows aero equipment, or even being in the aero position has little impact at that point.   This is what happens when "even when you're right, your just plain wrong".  I'm sure someone will disagree, but I'll submit they're riding with a parachute deployed behind them.

2013-04-25 2:24 PM
in reply to: #4715114

Extreme Veteran
3025
2000100025
Maryland
Subject: RE:
FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 2:21 PM
brigby1 - 2013-04-25 1:36 PM
JohnnyKay - 2013-04-25 1:28 PM
FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 1:51 PM
RChung - 2013-04-25 12:43 PM

FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 10:33 AM

By the way, aero is useless under a certain (bike + wind) speed.  For me that's around 17-19 mph.  On a calm day, aero picks up significant benefit around 20 mph and really kicks into gear around 25-30 mph.

This doesn't say anything about when aero equipment begins to have an effect on speed.  It certainly is NOT at 12 mph (ground speed + windspeed) or thereabouts, which is what I think you're implying by this chart?   It would be very misleading to say so.

Actually, I believe it says that aerodynamics begins to have an effect on speed at about the time you establish velocity.  But physics can be terribly misleading.

Yes, aero has an effect any time you are trying to go forward. The crossing point on the graph is only where aero resistance and rolling resistance are equal.

Yet anyone who rides knows aero equipment, or even being in the aero position has little impact at that point.   This is what happens when "even when you're right, your just plain wrong".  I'm sure someone will disagree, but I'll submit they're riding with a parachute deployed behind them.

define little impact? maybe for someone who rides as hard as they can at 11mph can go 12mph with their aero equiptment. that is certainly a big impact for them. what you're saying is that when YOU ride 12 mph you can't tell the difference, that doesn't mean theres not a difference.

2013-04-25 2:27 PM
in reply to: #4715123

Veteran
629
50010025
Grapevine, TX
Subject: RE:
dmiller5 - 2013-04-25 2:24 PM
FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 2:21 PM
brigby1 - 2013-04-25 1:36 PM
JohnnyKay - 2013-04-25 1:28 PM
FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 1:51 PM
RChung - 2013-04-25 12:43 PM

FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 10:33 AM

By the way, aero is useless under a certain (bike + wind) speed.  For me that's around 17-19 mph.  On a calm day, aero picks up significant benefit around 20 mph and really kicks into gear around 25-30 mph.

This doesn't say anything about when aero equipment begins to have an effect on speed.  It certainly is NOT at 12 mph (ground speed + windspeed) or thereabouts, which is what I think you're implying by this chart?   It would be very misleading to say so.

Actually, I believe it says that aerodynamics begins to have an effect on speed at about the time you establish velocity.  But physics can be terribly misleading.

Yes, aero has an effect any time you are trying to go forward. The crossing point on the graph is only where aero resistance and rolling resistance are equal.

Yet anyone who rides knows aero equipment, or even being in the aero position has little impact at that point.   This is what happens when "even when you're right, your just plain wrong".  I'm sure someone will disagree, but I'll submit they're riding with a parachute deployed behind them.

define little impact? maybe for someone who rides as hard as they can at 11mph can go 12mph with their aero equiptment. that is certainly a big impact for them. what you're saying is that when YOU ride 12 mph you can't tell the difference, that doesn't mean theres not a difference.

Nope.  You won't get 1 mph at 12 mph from aero equipment.  Something else is doing it (maybe feeling cool with that equipment on).  There just isn't enough wind force to overcome at that speed to gain an advantage of almost 10%.

Edit:  Second thought on this - the mechanicals (gearing etc.) could be a big factor.  Aero bikes often come with improved systems.



Edited by FranzZemen 2013-04-25 2:31 PM
2013-04-25 2:32 PM
in reply to: #4715114

Champion
9407
500020002000100100100100
Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia
Subject: RE:
FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 4:21 PM

Yet anyone who rides knows aero equipment, or even being in the aero position has little impact at that point.   This is what happens when "even when you're right, your just plain wrong".  I'm sure someone will disagree, but I'll submit they're riding with a parachute deployed behind them.



Feel free to run the numbers:

Power = coefficient of rolling resistance * mass * acceleration due to gravity * velocity + 1/2 * rho * drag coefficient * cross sectional area * veloctiy ^ 3

This assumes a flat course and calm conditions but will give some insight into what happens to power with speed and CdA changes.

Shane


2013-04-25 2:34 PM
in reply to: #4715126

Subject: RE:
FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 9:27 AM

Nope.  You won't get 1 mph at 12 mph from aero equipment.  Something else is doing it (maybe feeling cool with that equipment on).  There just isn't enough wind force to overcome at that speed to gain an advantage of almost 10%.

Edit:  Second thought on this - the mechanicals (gearing etc.) could be a big factor.  Aero bikes often come with improved systems.

Ride your bike around at 12 mph...then ride your bike with one of those running parachutes attached to your back and let me know if you think aerodynamics don't matter at 12 mph.

ETA: Or even simpler...try riding 12 mph into a 30 mph headwind.



Edited by tri808 2013-04-25 2:37 PM
2013-04-25 2:36 PM
in reply to: #4715126

Champion
9407
500020002000100100100100
Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia
Subject: RE:
FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 4:27 PM

Edit:  Second thought on this - the mechanicals (gearing etc.) could be a big factor.  Aero bikes often come with improved systems.



Nope - the efficiency differences between well maintained groupsets will not result in a significant change in performance.

Shane
2013-04-25 2:36 PM
in reply to: #4715114

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2013-04-25 2:37 PM
in reply to: #4715126

Extreme Veteran
3025
2000100025
Maryland
Subject: RE:
FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 2:27 PM
dmiller5 - 2013-04-25 2:24 PM
FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 2:21 PM
brigby1 - 2013-04-25 1:36 PM
JohnnyKay - 2013-04-25 1:28 PM
FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 1:51 PM
RChung - 2013-04-25 12:43 PM

FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 10:33 AM

By the way, aero is useless under a certain (bike + wind) speed.  For me that's around 17-19 mph.  On a calm day, aero picks up significant benefit around 20 mph and really kicks into gear around 25-30 mph.

This doesn't say anything about when aero equipment begins to have an effect on speed.  It certainly is NOT at 12 mph (ground speed + windspeed) or thereabouts, which is what I think you're implying by this chart?   It would be very misleading to say so.

Actually, I believe it says that aerodynamics begins to have an effect on speed at about the time you establish velocity.  But physics can be terribly misleading.

Yes, aero has an effect any time you are trying to go forward. The crossing point on the graph is only where aero resistance and rolling resistance are equal.

Yet anyone who rides knows aero equipment, or even being in the aero position has little impact at that point.   This is what happens when "even when you're right, your just plain wrong".  I'm sure someone will disagree, but I'll submit they're riding with a parachute deployed behind them.

define little impact? maybe for someone who rides as hard as they can at 11mph can go 12mph with their aero equiptment. that is certainly a big impact for them. what you're saying is that when YOU ride 12 mph you can't tell the difference, that doesn't mean theres not a difference.

Nope.  You won't get 1 mph at 12 mph from aero equipment.  Something else is doing it (maybe feeling cool with that equipment on).  There just isn't enough wind force to overcome at that speed to gain an advantage of almost 10%.

Edit:  Second thought on this - the mechanicals (shifting etc.) could be a big factor.  Aero bikes often come with improved systems.

If you have a bad position on a road bike with no aero equiptment, and go to a good position on a tri bike with good aero equiptment, you can pick up 10%

2013-04-25 2:39 PM
in reply to: #4715032

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.

Edited by Fred D 2013-04-25 2:40 PM


2013-04-25 2:43 PM
in reply to: #4715155

Extreme Veteran
3025
2000100025
Maryland
Subject: RE:
Fred D - 2013-04-25 2:39 PM

 

 One interesting thing about this graph is it makes me think that tires with excellent rolling resistance (low) would be even more important for hill climbing, no?

ie; climbing many hills where I live is at best 10mph and thats where these forces seem to be highest c.f. 20mph speeds.

Is this true?

yes, the rolling resistance would be a higher percentage of your total power requirement, however total weight would at that point be your governing factor for power requirement. BUT when you go down the hill later, your aerodynamics controls your speed again; you get all the energy back from gravity, but are fighting wind resistance. The more aero you are the more of your stored potential energy can turn into speed.



Edited by dmiller5 2013-04-25 2:44 PM
2013-04-25 2:45 PM
in reply to: #4715134

Veteran
629
50010025
Grapevine, TX
Subject: RE:

gsmacleod - 2013-04-25 2:32 PM
FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 4:21 PM Yet anyone who rides knows aero equipment, or even being in the aero position has little impact at that point.   This is what happens when "even when you're right, your just plain wrong".  I'm sure someone will disagree, but I'll submit they're riding with a parachute deployed behind them.
Feel free to run the numbers: Power = coefficient of rolling resistance * mass * acceleration due to gravity * velocity + 1/2 * rho * drag coefficient * cross sectional area * veloctiy ^ 3 This assumes a flat course and calm conditions but will give some insight into what happens to power with speed and CdA changes. Shane

The % of mass and cross section of the bicycle relative to the human body is small.  Moreover, the % difference between an aero bike and a non-aero bike is even smaller.  So it takes quite a bit of wind to make that small component important.  Not sure you can decipher what that means, but....

Anyways I feel like I'm taking crazy pills on this thread :-) Don't you guys ride?  You should know when aero becomes relevant.  So getting faster on a bike means being fit enough to get it into the zone where it is important.  And with that, I'm going to go invent the piano key necktie.



Edited by FranzZemen 2013-04-25 2:46 PM
2013-04-25 2:49 PM
in reply to: #4715163

Not a Coach
11473
5000500010001001001001002525
Media, PA
Subject: RE:
FranzZemen - 2013-04-25 3:45 PM

Anyways I feel like I'm taking crazy pills on this thread :-) Don't you guys ride?  You should know when aero becomes relevant.  So getting faster on a bike means being fit enough to get it into the zone where it is important.  And with that, I'm going to go invent the piano key necktie.

The only crazy part is you not understanding the laws of physics.  Aero becomes relevant as soon as you decide you want to go as fast as possible.  If you don't care about that until you get up to 20mph (or whatever speed you choose), so be it.  Most of us care as soon as the gun goes off.

2013-04-25 2:50 PM
in reply to: #4715155

Subject: RE:
Fred D - 2013-04-25 9:39 AM

 One interesting thing about this graph is it makes me think that tires with excellent rolling resistance (low) would be even more important for hill climbing, no?

ie; climbing many hills where I live is at best 10mph and thats where these forces seem to be highest c.f. 20mph speeds.

Is this true?

I would be very interested to know this as well.  It sort of makes sense in my mind.  Take the extreme example of those "world strongest man" competitions where they try to pull a bus.  The most effort they use is just to get the bus rolling...but once they've got it moving, it seems the force to keep the speed up isn't nearly as great as the force it took to get it started.

New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Best ways to increase biking speed Rss Feed  
 
 
of 6