Other Resources The Political Joe » Dear Daughter... Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 9
 
 
2013-08-17 9:32 PM
in reply to: 0

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...

Sex is a lot of things... a biological function is probably the least that anyone cares about. You can't make it something it isn't, sex is a big deal. I have yet to see any culture on the planet that thinks open public sex anytime anywhere is an acceptable thing. Getting someone to agree to swap bodily fluids with you is not like shaking hands. If you think it is, go out on any public street and see how it works out.

And as far as marriage being an unnatural state... it's what ever state you want it to be. Half the population cheats. And it is equal between men and women... do you know what that means... half the population DOESN'T. Monogamous relationships are not the exception.



Edited by powerman 2013-08-17 9:32 PM


2013-08-17 9:44 PM
in reply to: powerman

User image

Regular
5477
5000100100100100252525
LHOTP
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by powerman

Sex is a lot of things... a biological function is probably the least that anyone cares about. You can't make it something it isn't, sex is a big deal. I have yet to see any culture on the planet that thinks open public sex anytime anywhere is an acceptable thing. Getting someone to agree to swap bodily fluids with you is not like shaking hands. If you think it is, go out on any public street and see how it works out.

And as far as marriage being an unnatural state... it's what ever state you want it to be. Half the population cheats. And it is equal between men and women... do you know what that means... half the population DOESN'T. Monogamous relationships are not the exception.

See Tony? Powerman and I have a totally different approach to sex. Can you imagine how bad it would be if we only had ever had each other; )
2013-08-17 9:50 PM
in reply to: tuwood

User image

Regular
5477
5000100100100100252525
LHOTP
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by tuwood
Originally posted by switch

Tony, you didn't know where I'd fall on this?  I feel like I'm so predictable :)

So, it sounds like you and I are at pretty much opposite ends of the spectrum on this one.  I would be very interested in reading some of the books you mentioned (I have never even heard of the term courtship disorder/distortion).

I think sex is just sex.  I think it certainly can be more, but it doesn't have to be. I think the stuff that can really end up hurting someone's (especially women's) pyshce is having social value and judgement attached to sex.  STDs and pregnancy are issues, but not insurmountable ones.  Gotta be smart there.

I would even go so far as to say that if my children get married (I think marriage is an unnatural state, too, but, that's a different thread altogether), I hope they do have sex with other people so that they know what they like, want, etc in a partner.  If it's good, it's a non issue; if it's not good, it can be a deal breaker. 

Some people are just wired differently in that department. To me it's as important as sharing similar politics, beliefs etc. 

For a long time women were taught to just sort of take whatever they get in that department, and that idea makes my blood boil.  I applaud things that work to deconstruct that idea :)

lol, i had my suspicions but I try not to assume.  :)

So, if marriage is an unnatural state, do you feel monogamy is more of a societal thing than a natural thing?  Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying.

I also think you under estimate the power of emotion when it comes to sex.  I know for many people sex is just sex, but for most I feel it's a whole lot more.  The desire for sex can drive people to do horrible things and the jealousy that can ensue afterwards can lead to mass destruction as well.

I do have a genuine interest in understanding other mindsets and beliefs on this topic.  The article seemed really shocking to me that somebody could think that way, so I threw it out here to try and understand the a little more.

I will say it was kind of funny on FB.  There was nothing but crickets on her post, not a single response from her 800+ friends.  Nobody wanted to touch that one.

Long term monogamy is not natural for humans, IMO. Can they do it? Sure. They can also be vegan. As I said above, sex can just be sex or sex can be more. I just don't think it's a given that it is always one way or the other. Look, I can't speak for anyone but me, but that's how I think about it. YSMV.
2013-08-17 10:01 PM
in reply to: switch

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by switch
Originally posted by powerman

Sex is a lot of things... a biological function is probably the least that anyone cares about. You can't make it something it isn't, sex is a big deal. I have yet to see any culture on the planet that thinks open public sex anytime anywhere is an acceptable thing. Getting someone to agree to swap bodily fluids with you is not like shaking hands. If you think it is, go out on any public street and see how it works out.

And as far as marriage being an unnatural state... it's what ever state you want it to be. Half the population cheats. And it is equal between men and women... do you know what that means... half the population DOESN'T. Monogamous relationships are not the exception.

See Tony? Powerman and I have a totally different approach to sex. Can you imagine how bad it would be if we only had ever had each other; )

that made me laugh.  

What's funny is even the opposite doesn't always work out.  One of my closest friends played the field through college and ended up marrying the girl who was quite compatible with him sexually (as in, pretty much every day).

Once they got married, she had no desire to ever do it again.  We're talking 6 month+ spats of nothing.

She had sex because she knew she had to do it to get a man.  Once she got him, she didn't have to do it anymore.  The clinical term for that is sexual anorexia.

2013-08-17 10:04 PM
in reply to: tuwood

User image

Regular
5477
5000100100100100252525
LHOTP
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by tuwood
Originally posted by switch
Originally posted by powerman

Sex is a lot of things... a biological function is probably the least that anyone cares about. You can't make it something it isn't, sex is a big deal. I have yet to see any culture on the planet that thinks open public sex anytime anywhere is an acceptable thing. Getting someone to agree to swap bodily fluids with you is not like shaking hands. If you think it is, go out on any public street and see how it works out.

And as far as marriage being an unnatural state... it's what ever state you want it to be. Half the population cheats. And it is equal between men and women... do you know what that means... half the population DOESN'T. Monogamous relationships are not the exception.

See Tony? Powerman and I have a totally different approach to sex. Can you imagine how bad it would be if we only had ever had each other; )

that made me laugh.  :)

What's funny is even the opposite doesn't always work out.  One of my closest friends played the field through college and ended up marrying the girl who was quite compatible with him sexually (as in, pretty much every day).

Once they got married, she had no desire to ever do it again.  We're talking 6 month+ spats of nothing.

She had sex because she knew she had to do it to get a man.  Once she got him, she didn't have to do it anymore.  The clinical term for that is sexual anorexia.

Geez, Tony, I'm learning more about dysfunctional sex from you in this thread than I've learned in any other single source ever :)
2013-08-17 10:04 PM
in reply to: switch

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by switch
Originally posted by powerman

Sex is a lot of things... a biological function is probably the least that anyone cares about. You can't make it something it isn't, sex is a big deal. I have yet to see any culture on the planet that thinks open public sex anytime anywhere is an acceptable thing. Getting someone to agree to swap bodily fluids with you is not like shaking hands. If you think it is, go out on any public street and see how it works out.

And as far as marriage being an unnatural state... it's what ever state you want it to be. Half the population cheats. And it is equal between men and women... do you know what that means... half the population DOESN'T. Monogamous relationships are not the exception.

See Tony? Powerman and I have a totally different approach to sex. Can you imagine how bad it would be if we only had ever had each other; )

Oh don't worry, I'd hit it. But right now I am in an monogamous relationship. If it is ever down to just you and me... it's on. Wink



2013-08-17 10:05 PM
in reply to: switch

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by switch
Originally posted by tuwood
Originally posted by switch

Tony, you didn't know where I'd fall on this?  I feel like I'm so predictable

So, it sounds like you and I are at pretty much opposite ends of the spectrum on this one.  I would be very interested in reading some of the books you mentioned (I have never even heard of the term courtship disorder/distortion).

I think sex is just sex.  I think it certainly can be more, but it doesn't have to be. I think the stuff that can really end up hurting someone's (especially women's) pyshce is having social value and judgement attached to sex.  STDs and pregnancy are issues, but not insurmountable ones.  Gotta be smart there.

I would even go so far as to say that if my children get married (I think marriage is an unnatural state, too, but, that's a different thread altogether), I hope they do have sex with other people so that they know what they like, want, etc in a partner.  If it's good, it's a non issue; if it's not good, it can be a deal breaker. 

Some people are just wired differently in that department. To me it's as important as sharing similar politics, beliefs etc. 

For a long time women were taught to just sort of take whatever they get in that department, and that idea makes my blood boil.  I applaud things that work to deconstruct that idea

lol, i had my suspicions but I try not to assume.  

So, if marriage is an unnatural state, do you feel monogamy is more of a societal thing than a natural thing?  Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying.

I also think you under estimate the power of emotion when it comes to sex.  I know for many people sex is just sex, but for most I feel it's a whole lot more.  The desire for sex can drive people to do horrible things and the jealousy that can ensue afterwards can lead to mass destruction as well.

I do have a genuine interest in understanding other mindsets and beliefs on this topic.  The article seemed really shocking to me that somebody could think that way, so I threw it out here to try and understand the a little more.

I will say it was kind of funny on FB.  There was nothing but crickets on her post, not a single response from her 800+ friends.  Nobody wanted to touch that one.

Long term monogamy is not natural for humans, IMO. Can they do it? Sure. They can also be vegan. As I said above, sex can just be sex or sex can be more. I just don't think it's a given that it is always one way or the other. Look, I can't speak for anyone but me, but that's how I think about it. YSMV.

No worries, like I said, I'm not trying to get anybody to change.  It just genuinely fascinates me how people can have completely opposite viewpoints on things like this.  I try to dig into pasts to see where the beliefs originate from, but mostly out of curiosity.

I am wondering what society would look like if everyone subscribed to the Switch philosophy though.  

2013-08-17 10:07 PM
in reply to: switch

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by switch
Originally posted by tuwood
Originally posted by switch

Tony, you didn't know where I'd fall on this?  I feel like I'm so predictable

So, it sounds like you and I are at pretty much opposite ends of the spectrum on this one.  I would be very interested in reading some of the books you mentioned (I have never even heard of the term courtship disorder/distortion).

I think sex is just sex.  I think it certainly can be more, but it doesn't have to be. I think the stuff that can really end up hurting someone's (especially women's) pyshce is having social value and judgement attached to sex.  STDs and pregnancy are issues, but not insurmountable ones.  Gotta be smart there.

I would even go so far as to say that if my children get married (I think marriage is an unnatural state, too, but, that's a different thread altogether), I hope they do have sex with other people so that they know what they like, want, etc in a partner.  If it's good, it's a non issue; if it's not good, it can be a deal breaker. 

Some people are just wired differently in that department. To me it's as important as sharing similar politics, beliefs etc. 

For a long time women were taught to just sort of take whatever they get in that department, and that idea makes my blood boil.  I applaud things that work to deconstruct that idea

lol, i had my suspicions but I try not to assume.  

So, if marriage is an unnatural state, do you feel monogamy is more of a societal thing than a natural thing?  Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying.

I also think you under estimate the power of emotion when it comes to sex.  I know for many people sex is just sex, but for most I feel it's a whole lot more.  The desire for sex can drive people to do horrible things and the jealousy that can ensue afterwards can lead to mass destruction as well.

I do have a genuine interest in understanding other mindsets and beliefs on this topic.  The article seemed really shocking to me that somebody could think that way, so I threw it out here to try and understand the a little more.

I will say it was kind of funny on FB.  There was nothing but crickets on her post, not a single response from her 800+ friends.  Nobody wanted to touch that one.

Long term monogamy is not natural for humans, IMO. Can they do it? Sure. They can also be vegan. As I said above, sex can just be sex or sex can be more. I just don't think it's a given that it is always one way or the other. Look, I can't speak for anyone but me, but that's how I think about it. YSMV.

Tell that to my folks that have been married nearly 50 years. Who decided what is and what is not "natural" for all human beings?

2013-08-17 10:29 PM
in reply to: powerman

User image

Regular
5477
5000100100100100252525
LHOTP
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
[Doesn'tQUOTE]Originally posted by powerman
Originally posted by switch
Originally posted by tuwood
Originally posted by switch

Tony, you didn't know where I'd fall on this?  I feel like I'm so predictable :)

So, it sounds like you and I are at pretty much opposite ends of the spectrum on this one.  I would be very interested in reading some of the books you mentioned (I have never even heard of the term courtship disorder/distortion).

I think sex is just sex.  I think it certainly can be more, but it doesn't have to be. I think the stuff that can really end up hurting someone's (especially women's) pyshce is having social value and judgement attached to sex.  STDs and pregnancy are issues, but not insurmountable ones.  Gotta be smart there.

I would even go so far as to say that if my children get married (I think marriage is an unnatural state, too, but, that's a different thread altogether), I hope they do have sex with other people so that they know what they like, want, etc in a partner.  If it's good, it's a non issue; if it's not good, it can be a deal breaker. 

Some people are just wired differently in that department. To me it's as important as sharing similar politics, beliefs etc. 

For a long time women were taught to just sort of take whatever they get in that department, and that idea makes my blood boil.  I applaud things that work to deconstruct that idea :)

lol, i had my suspicions but I try not to assume.  :)

So, if marriage is an unnatural state, do you feel monogamy is more of a societal thing than a natural thing?  Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying.

I also think you under estimate the power of emotion when it comes to sex.  I know for many people sex is just sex, but for most I feel it's a whole lot more.  The desire for sex can drive people to do horrible things and the jealousy that can ensue afterwards can lead to mass destruction as well.

I do have a genuine interest in understanding other mindsets and beliefs on this topic.  The article seemed really shocking to me that somebody could think that way, so I threw it out here to try and understand the a little more.

I will say it was kind of funny on FB.  There was nothing but crickets on her post, not a single response from her 800+ friends.  Nobody wanted to touch that one.

Long term monogamy is not natural for humans, IMO. Can they do it? Sure. They can also be vegan. As I said above, sex can just be sex or sex can be more. I just don't think it's a given that it is always one way or the other. Look, I can't speak for anyone but me, but that's how I think about it. YSMV.

Tell that to my folks that have been married nearly 50 years. Who decided what is and what is not "natural" for all human beings?

Definitely not me:) Kudos to your parents. Again, people choose to do things all the time. Lots of things play into these choices, including societal norms. I was trying to answer Tony's question from a biological "natural" perspective--the "would humans mate for life" question--and in some bizarre not impacted by society state that doesn't actually exist, I don't think humans would be monogomous. There isn't enough of a biological advantage to be so, and there most certainly could be an advantage to them not being so.
2013-08-17 10:40 PM
in reply to: switch

User image

Pro
15655
5000500050005001002525
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...

In most of the animal world there is no "mating for life".....which makes me wonder why humans would be different lacking societal norms. 

I can't imagine the first "'humans" were monogamous.  Even now, I doubt it's an accident that there are more women than men.

I guess I fall in the "not natural" camp.....but it can be done if there is compatibility, especially in today's world of STD's.

2013-08-18 1:54 AM
in reply to: Left Brain

User image

Elite
4435
2000200010010010010025
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...

its funny I was on the phone to my mom in the UK the other day - been married for 60 years.  We were discussing one of my sisters whose marriage is not great.  My mum said oh they just stay together for their daughter.

I said oh yes probably - she said, well we all do that don't we....

So I wonder if my mum hadn't had the four of us would their marriage have flourished.  My parents are like friends now - but the bicker the whole time which I find amusing.

I would not sacrifice my happiness just because I have a child - the world has changed.  I would for sure give it my best shot, but my daughter deserves a happy mom over and above anything else - IMO.



2013-08-18 7:56 AM
in reply to: tuwood

User image

Expert
1186
1000100252525
North Cackalacky
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
I liked it. I hope I can be half that coherent when I have to start talking to my daughters about sex, since I will not be espousing an "abstinence until you're married" policy.
2013-08-18 8:19 AM
in reply to: jobaxas

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by jobaxas

its funny I was on the phone to my mom in the UK the other day - been married for 60 years.  We were discussing one of my sisters whose marriage is not great.  My mum said oh they just stay together for their daughter.

I said oh yes probably - she said, well we all do that don't we....

So I wonder if my mum hadn't had the four of us would their marriage have flourished.  My parents are like friends now - but the bicker the whole time which I find amusing.

I would not sacrifice my happiness just because I have a child - the world has changed.  I would for sure give it my best shot, but my daughter deserves a happy mom over and above anything else - IMO.

I'm obviously a proponent of people staying married, but it drives me nuts too when I see people staying married "for the kids".  It ends up doing far more harm than good in the long run in most cases.  If you're growing up with parents who are just "roommates" it instills a false sense of what being married should be.  The kids would be far better off with two divorced parents in happy marriages, IMHO.  

So, either work on your marriage and make it a marriage, or get a divorce.  

2013-08-18 9:12 AM
in reply to: 0

User image

Expert
1951
10005001001001001002525
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by TriMyBest

  My point is that n=1, but in our case, demystifying sex and relationships rather than forbidding it didn't cause them to be an emotional mess as is often claimed will happen if we let the genie out of the bottle.

 

The problem is, having a permissive attitude about my son having sex "for the sake of sex" is that I am not respecting the potential wishes of parents of whomever the girl might be.. 

I also completely disagree with the whole sex is just sex thing. I'd never teach my son that. Never. 

PS: One of my friend's son's was in a long term relationship at 13-16 and then she dumped him. He was so depressed he attempted suicide. She was his world. Maybe some kids can handle the heavy dating thing but a lot can get really screwed up by all of that..

I don't have any desire to "control" my son's social life, but I can give him guidance. I'd definitely encourage him to have lot's of friends, boys and girls, do lot's of activities, but take life slow and focus on growing and learning.. not on putting all his eggs in one basket at 15. 



Edited by KateTri1 2013-08-18 9:22 AM
2013-08-18 9:38 AM
in reply to: KateTri1

User image

Expert
1951
10005001001001001002525
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
LOL. In fact, when he get's older I might tell him, "if you want to have sex with a girl, just to "have sex" then call her dad. Tell him what you want to do, and ask his permission. If he tells you "fine" then.. go for it."
2013-08-18 10:27 AM
in reply to: 0

User image

Regular
5477
5000100100100100252525
LHOTP
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by KateTri1
Originally posted by TriMyBest

  My point is that n=1, but in our case, demystifying sex and relationships rather than forbidding it didn't cause them to be an emotional mess as is often claimed will happen if we let the genie out of the bottle.

 

The problem is, having a permissive attitude about my son having sex "for the sake of sex" is that I am not respecting the potential wishes of parents of whomever the girl might be.. 

I also completely disagree with the whole sex is just sex thing. I'd never teach my son that. Never. 

PS: One of my friend's son's was in a long term relationship at 13-16 and then she dumped him. He was so depressed he attempted suicide. She was his world. Maybe some kids can handle the heavy dating thing but a lot can get really screwed up by all of that..

I don't have any desire to "control" my son's social life, but I can give him guidance. I'd definitely encourage him to have lot's of friends, boys and girls, do lot's of activities, but take life slow and focus on growing and learning.. not on putting all his eggs in one basket at 15. 

Why can't someone do all the things you just listed and also have sex? Why does the having sex part put "all the eggs in one basket"?

Edited by switch 2013-08-18 10:36 AM


2013-08-18 10:29 AM
in reply to: KateTri1

User image

Regular
5477
5000100100100100252525
LHOTP
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by KateTri1LOL. In fact, when he get's older I might tell him, "if you want to have sex with a girl, just to "have sex" then call her dad. Tell him what you want to do, and ask his permission. If he tells you "fine" then.. go for it."
At what age do you imagine it should be your son and his hypotheticsl partner's choice?
2013-08-18 10:42 AM
in reply to: KateTri1

User image

Pro
5755
50005001001002525
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by KateTri1

Originally posted by TriMyBest

  My point is that n=1, but in our case, demystifying sex and relationships rather than forbidding it didn't cause them to be an emotional mess as is often claimed will happen if we let the genie out of the bottle.

 

The problem is, having a permissive attitude about my son having sex "for the sake of sex" is that I am not respecting the potential wishes of parents of whomever the girl might be.. 

I also completely disagree with the whole sex is just sex thing. I'd never teach my son that. Never. 

PS: One of my friend's son's was in a long term relationship at 13-16 and then she dumped him. He was so depressed he attempted suicide. She was his world. Maybe some kids can handle the heavy dating thing but a lot can get really screwed up by all of that..

I don't have any desire to "control" my son's social life, but I can give him guidance. I'd definitely encourage him to have lot's of friends, boys and girls, do lot's of activities, but take life slow and focus on growing and learning.. not on putting all his eggs in one basket at 15. 



Respect cuts both ways, for the boy and the girl. My sons had better learn to be respectful to any girl they date and to their families or I am doing a lousy job as a parent. I'm divorced, but my ex and I are on the same page and back each other 100% when it comes to the kids.

Actually, my oldest has been dating the same girl for 3 years now, since HS. We thought that college would end it, especially since they don't get to see each other much, but it seems to work for them. They broke up this year for about 3 weeks - pressure of finals, jobs, distance, etc. but they reconciled and realize now relationships are work. He sleeps at her house and vice versa - but not in the same room. I'm not that liberal. I know they are sexually active - no topic is off limits in our houses - but not under my roof. Both of them are intelligent and career-driven (she wants to be a trauma surgeon), and our advice (both her parents and us) can be summed up as: be smart and don't do anything that will eff-up the rest of your lives.

2013-08-18 11:40 AM
in reply to: BrianRunsPhilly

User image

Expert
1951
10005001001001001002525
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by BrianRunsPhilly
Originally posted by KateTri1
Originally posted by TriMyBest

  My point is that n=1, but in our case, demystifying sex and relationships rather than forbidding it didn't cause them to be an emotional mess as is often claimed will happen if we let the genie out of the bottle.

 

The problem is, having a permissive attitude about my son having sex "for the sake of sex" is that I am not respecting the potential wishes of parents of whomever the girl might be.. 

I also completely disagree with the whole sex is just sex thing. I'd never teach my son that. Never. 

PS: One of my friend's son's was in a long term relationship at 13-16 and then she dumped him. He was so depressed he attempted suicide. She was his world. Maybe some kids can handle the heavy dating thing but a lot can get really screwed up by all of that..

I don't have any desire to "control" my son's social life, but I can give him guidance. I'd definitely encourage him to have lot's of friends, boys and girls, do lot's of activities, but take life slow and focus on growing and learning.. not on putting all his eggs in one basket at 15. 

Respect cuts both ways, for the boy and the girl. My sons had better learn to be respectful to any girl they date and to their families or I am doing a lousy job as a parent. I'm divorced, but my ex and I are on the same page and back each other 100% when it comes to the kids. Actually, my oldest has been dating the same girl for 3 years now, since HS. We thought that college would end it, especially since they don't get to see each other much, but it seems to work for them. They broke up this year for about 3 weeks - pressure of finals, jobs, distance, etc. but they reconciled and realize now relationships are work. He sleeps at her house and vice versa - but not in the same room. I'm not that liberal. I know they are sexually active - no topic is off limits in our houses - but not under my roof. Both of them are intelligent and career-driven (she wants to be a trauma surgeon), and our advice (both her parents and us) can be summed up as: be smart and don't do anything that will eff-up the rest of your lives.

 As a young teen, if my son met a girl he was crazy about I know I wouldn't be able to keep him away from her in every sense of the word. But I could definitely do a lot to guide.. or not. My parents did nothing in that regard. They never set dating guidelines at all. I was on my own. I did have a few teachers that gave me some good advice, that I listened to. And I think it saved me a lot of heartache. 

My husband comes from a really strict culture. He never dated a girl till he met me. We were 28. I was his first kiss. He survived his teen years and even his twenty's without sex. In spite of his abstinence, when I met him he was, and still is, a very happy person.

So, it can be done. 

2013-08-18 11:46 AM
in reply to: 0

User image

Expert
1951
10005001001001001002525
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...

Originally posted by switch
Originally posted by KateTri1LOL. In fact, when he get's older I might tell him, "if you want to have sex with a girl, just to "have sex" then call her dad. Tell him what you want to do, and ask his permission. If he tells you "fine" then.. go for it."
At what age do you imagine it should be your son and his hypotheticsl partner's choice?

I'm not so naive to think that it won't always be a matter of choice.

But my advice to him would be... If he really love's the girl, commit.

When you have the means to,

walk down the isle and say "I will love and cherish you all the days of my life.." 

Until then, be the man that keeps it in his pants. 

BTW Switch.. I looked at your race pics.. I agree with Goose. You are one hot mama.



Edited by KateTri1 2013-08-18 12:13 PM
2013-08-18 12:24 PM
in reply to: BrianRunsPhilly

User image

Pro
6011
50001000
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by BrianRunsPhilly
Originally posted by KateTri1
Originally posted by TriMyBest

  My point is that n=1, but in our case, demystifying sex and relationships rather than forbidding it didn't cause them to be an emotional mess as is often claimed will happen if we let the genie out of the bottle.

 

The problem is, having a permissive attitude about my son having sex "for the sake of sex" is that I am not respecting the potential wishes of parents of whomever the girl might be.. 

I also completely disagree with the whole sex is just sex thing. I'd never teach my son that. Never. 

PS: One of my friend's son's was in a long term relationship at 13-16 and then she dumped him. He was so depressed he attempted suicide. She was his world. Maybe some kids can handle the heavy dating thing but a lot can get really screwed up by all of that..

I don't have any desire to "control" my son's social life, but I can give him guidance. I'd definitely encourage him to have lot's of friends, boys and girls, do lot's of activities, but take life slow and focus on growing and learning.. not on putting all his eggs in one basket at 15. 

Respect cuts both ways, for the boy and the girl. My sons had better learn to be respectful to any girl they date and to their families or I am doing a lousy job as a parent. I'm divorced, but my ex and I are on the same page and back each other 100% when it comes to the kids. Actually, my oldest has been dating the same girl for 3 years now, since HS. We thought that college would end it, especially since they don't get to see each other much, but it seems to work for them. They broke up this year for about 3 weeks - pressure of finals, jobs, distance, etc. but they reconciled and realize now relationships are work. He sleeps at her house and vice versa - but not in the same room. I'm not that liberal. I know they are sexually active - no topic is off limits in our houses - but not under my roof. Both of them are intelligent and career-driven (she wants to be a trauma surgeon), and our advice (both her parents and us) can be summed up as: be smart and don't do anything that will eff-up the rest of your lives.

^^^What Brian said^^^

Kate and Powerman, your reactions to my post demonstrate my point that our culture teaches us to view sex through a filter different than other biological functions.  You both seem to have read my post and interpreted it to mean I was all for free love and everybody having sex with everybody else willy nilly without consideration for any consequences.

Powerman, there are plenty of good and practical reasons why public sex in the street isn't a good idea, just as allowing public urination and defecation would be counter to the public good.

Kate, nowhere in my post did I say it was ok for a youth to have sex "for the sake of sex", or that I allowed my teenage son and his girlfriend to do it in my house regardless of her parents' feelings.  There's a wide gulf between saying I don't forbid my son to have sex and saying that I advocate it.  In fact, we discouraged it without outright forbidding it until this year.  Now we don't discourage nor advocate.  Keep in mind that I'm talking about an 18 year old and his 19 year old girlfriend.

I said we discussed sex and relationships and tried to demystify them.  We try to keep it all in perspective.  To me, that means teaching how everything fits into the big picture of life.  First and foremost, that means respect for others.  It also means teaching from a young age that teenage dating should be kept in perspective.  I'm sorry to hear about your friend's son's anguish, but IMO, the fact that you say "she was his world" implies that the relationship held a much larger role in his life as a teenager than is probably a good idea for most teens.  If I saw my 15 or 16 yo son completely obsessed with a girl to the point that his grades were slipping, he wanted to quit sports, wasn't spending time with other friends or family, or couldn't go a day without talking to her, we'd be having lots of conversations to try to get his priorities back in order.  In the case of a 13-16 yo like you're talking about, I'd do everything possible to guide him to the realization that being in a serious relationship wasn't a good idea without outright forbidding it, because I personally believe that taking a hard line with teenagers rather than guiding them is more likely to result in their rebellion than it is getting them to do the best thing.

 



2013-08-18 1:23 PM
in reply to: TriMyBest

User image

Regular
5477
5000100100100100252525
LHOTP
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by TriMyBest
Originally posted by BrianRunsPhilly
Originally posted by KateTri1
Originally posted by TriMyBest

  My point is that n=1, but in our case, demystifying sex and relationships rather than forbidding it didn't cause them to be an emotional mess as is often claimed will happen if we let the genie out of the bottle.

 

The problem is, having a permissive attitude about my son having sex "for the sake of sex" is that I am not respecting the potential wishes of parents of whomever the girl might be.. 

I also completely disagree with the whole sex is just sex thing. I'd never teach my son that. Never. 

PS: One of my friend's son's was in a long term relationship at 13-16 and then she dumped him. He was so depressed he attempted suicide. She was his world. Maybe some kids can handle the heavy dating thing but a lot can get really screwed up by all of that..

I don't have any desire to "control" my son's social life, but I can give him guidance. I'd definitely encourage him to have lot's of friends, boys and girls, do lot's of activities, but take life slow and focus on growing and learning.. not on putting all his eggs in one basket at 15. 

Respect cuts both ways, for the boy and the girl. My sons had better learn to be respectful to any girl they date and to their families or I am doing a lousy job as a parent. I'm divorced, but my ex and I are on the same page and back each other 100% when it comes to the kids. Actually, my oldest has been dating the same girl for 3 years now, since HS. We thought that college would end it, especially since they don't get to see each other much, but it seems to work for them. They broke up this year for about 3 weeks - pressure of finals, jobs, distance, etc. but they reconciled and realize now relationships are work. He sleeps at her house and vice versa - but not in the same room. I'm not that liberal. I know they are sexually active - no topic is off limits in our houses - but not under my roof. Both of them are intelligent and career-driven (she wants to be a trauma surgeon), and our advice (both her parents and us) can be summed up as: be smart and don't do anything that will eff-up the rest of your lives.

^^^What Brian said^^^

Kate and Powerman, your reactions to my post demonstrate my point that our culture teaches us to view sex through a filter different than other biological functions.  You both seem to have read my post and interpreted it to mean I was all for free love and everybody having sex with everybody else willy nilly without consideration for any consequences.

Powerman, there are plenty of good and practical reasons why public sex in the street isn't a good idea, just as allowing public urination and defecation would be counter to the public good.

Kate, nowhere in my post did I say it was ok for a youth to have sex "for the sake of sex", or that I allowed my teenage son and his girlfriend to do it in my house regardless of her parents' feelings.  There's a wide gulf between saying I don't forbid my son to have sex and saying that I advocate it.  In fact, we discouraged it without outright forbidding it until this year.  Now we don't discourage nor advocate.  Keep in mind that I'm talking about an 18 year old and his 19 year old girlfriend.

I said we discussed sex and relationships and tried to demystify them.  We try to keep it all in perspective.  To me, that means teaching how everything fits into the big picture of life.  First and foremost, that means respect for others.  It also means teaching from a young age that teenage dating should be kept in perspective.  I'm sorry to hear about your friend's son's anguish, but IMO, the fact that you say "she was his world" implies that the relationship held a much larger role in his life as a teenager than is probably a good idea for most teens.  If I saw my 15 or 16 yo son completely obsessed with a girl to the point that his grades were slipping, he wanted to quit sports, wasn't spending time with other friends or family, or couldn't go a day without talking to her, we'd be having lots of conversations to try to get his priorities back in order.  In the case of a 13-16 yo like you're talking about, I'd do everything possible to guide him to the realization that being in a serious relationship wasn't a good idea without outright forbidding it, because I personally believe that taking a hard line with teenagers rather than guiding them is more likely to result in their rebellion than it is getting them to do the best thing.

 

Great post. Thank you.
2013-08-18 1:45 PM
in reply to: tuwood

User image

Regular
5477
5000100100100100252525
LHOTP
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by tuwood
Originally posted by switch
Originally posted by tuwood
Originally posted by switch

Tony, you didn't know where I'd fall on this?  I feel like I'm so predictable :)

So, it sounds like you and I are at pretty much opposite ends of the spectrum on this one.  I would be very interested in reading some of the books you mentioned (I have never even heard of the term courtship disorder/distortion).

I think sex is just sex.  I think it certainly can be more, but it doesn't have to be. I think the stuff that can really end up hurting someone's (especially women's) pyshce is having social value and judgement attached to sex.  STDs and pregnancy are issues, but not insurmountable ones.  Gotta be smart there.

I would even go so far as to say that if my children get married (I think marriage is an unnatural state, too, but, that's a different thread altogether), I hope they do have sex with other people so that they know what they like, want, etc in a partner.  If it's good, it's a non issue; if it's not good, it can be a deal breaker. 

Some people are just wired differently in that department. To me it's as important as sharing similar politics, beliefs etc. 

For a long time women were taught to just sort of take whatever they get in that department, and that idea makes my blood boil.  I applaud things that work to deconstruct that idea :)

lol, i had my suspicions but I try not to assume.  :)

So, if marriage is an unnatural state, do you feel monogamy is more of a societal thing than a natural thing?  Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying.

I also think you under estimate the power of emotion when it comes to sex.  I know for many people sex is just sex, but for most I feel it's a whole lot more.  The desire for sex can drive people to do horrible things and the jealousy that can ensue afterwards can lead to mass destruction as well.

I do have a genuine interest in understanding other mindsets and beliefs on this topic.  The article seemed really shocking to me that somebody could think that way, so I threw it out here to try and understand the a little more.

I will say it was kind of funny on FB.  There was nothing but crickets on her post, not a single response from her 800+ friends.  Nobody wanted to touch that one.

Long term monogamy is not natural for humans, IMO. Can they do it? Sure. They can also be vegan. As I said above, sex can just be sex or sex can be more. I just don't think it's a given that it is always one way or the other. Look, I can't speak for anyone but me, but that's how I think about it. YSMV.

No worries, like I said, I'm not trying to get anybody to change.  It just genuinely fascinates me how people can have completely opposite viewpoints on things like this.  I try to dig into pasts to see where the beliefs originate from, but mostly out of curiosity.

I am wondering what society would look like if everyone subscribed to the Switch philosophy though.  :)

So Tony I was thinking about this on my run. My mom lobbied for Planned Parenthood, BCBS, and the state board of medical examiners throughout my childhood (70s and 80s). I grew up with a very pragmatic view of sex and women's reproductive health issues. To clarify, I know I (clarifying here so I'm not making generalizations about others) can have safe, "satisfying" sex without being in a relationship, marriage or otherwise. That's what I mean when I say "sex is just sex." It doesn't have to exclude respect or anything else that is important or valued. If I don't respect someone and find them smart, they're not even going to be on my radar, let alone attractive enough to bed. Sex doesn't mean love and love doesn't mean sex. I've loved a man I never touched. So it's just really not a simple, one way all of the time thing, at least for me. I hope that my daughters will be able to have "satisfying" sex, whatever that looks like or feels like for them.
2013-08-18 3:33 PM
in reply to: switch

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by switch
Originally posted by tuwood
Originally posted by switch
Originally posted by tuwood
Originally posted by switch

Tony, you didn't know where I'd fall on this?  I feel like I'm so predictable

So, it sounds like you and I are at pretty much opposite ends of the spectrum on this one.  I would be very interested in reading some of the books you mentioned (I have never even heard of the term courtship disorder/distortion).

I think sex is just sex.  I think it certainly can be more, but it doesn't have to be. I think the stuff that can really end up hurting someone's (especially women's) pyshce is having social value and judgement attached to sex.  STDs and pregnancy are issues, but not insurmountable ones.  Gotta be smart there.

I would even go so far as to say that if my children get married (I think marriage is an unnatural state, too, but, that's a different thread altogether), I hope they do have sex with other people so that they know what they like, want, etc in a partner.  If it's good, it's a non issue; if it's not good, it can be a deal breaker. 

Some people are just wired differently in that department. To me it's as important as sharing similar politics, beliefs etc. 

For a long time women were taught to just sort of take whatever they get in that department, and that idea makes my blood boil.  I applaud things that work to deconstruct that idea

lol, i had my suspicions but I try not to assume.  

So, if marriage is an unnatural state, do you feel monogamy is more of a societal thing than a natural thing?  Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying.

I also think you under estimate the power of emotion when it comes to sex.  I know for many people sex is just sex, but for most I feel it's a whole lot more.  The desire for sex can drive people to do horrible things and the jealousy that can ensue afterwards can lead to mass destruction as well.

I do have a genuine interest in understanding other mindsets and beliefs on this topic.  The article seemed really shocking to me that somebody could think that way, so I threw it out here to try and understand the a little more.

I will say it was kind of funny on FB.  There was nothing but crickets on her post, not a single response from her 800+ friends.  Nobody wanted to touch that one.

Long term monogamy is not natural for humans, IMO. Can they do it? Sure. They can also be vegan. As I said above, sex can just be sex or sex can be more. I just don't think it's a given that it is always one way or the other. Look, I can't speak for anyone but me, but that's how I think about it. YSMV.

No worries, like I said, I'm not trying to get anybody to change.  It just genuinely fascinates me how people can have completely opposite viewpoints on things like this.  I try to dig into pasts to see where the beliefs originate from, but mostly out of curiosity.

I am wondering what society would look like if everyone subscribed to the Switch philosophy though.  

So Tony I was thinking about this on my run. My mom lobbied for Planned Parenthood, BCBS, and the state board of medical examiners throughout my childhood (70s and 80s). I grew up with a very pragmatic view of sex and women's reproductive health issues. To clarify, I know I (clarifying here so I'm not making generalizations about others) can have safe, "satisfying" sex without being in a relationship, marriage or otherwise. That's what I mean when I say "sex is just sex." It doesn't have to exclude respect or anything else that is important or valued. If I don't respect someone and find them smart, they're not even going to be on my radar, let alone attractive enough to bed. Sex doesn't mean love and love doesn't mean sex. I've loved a man I never touched. So it's just really not a simple, one way all of the time thing, at least for me. I hope that my daughters will be able to have "satisfying" sex, whatever that looks like or feels like for them.

That makes perfect sense, and I can certainly respect that opinion.  

I'll also say that "sex isn't love and love isn't sex" is a very wise statement.  I use that a lot because often times with the courtship gone awry issues I mentioned above people think the opposite.  Sex is love and love is sex.  So, if a girl has sex with them, then it's because they love them and they get all whacked out when she doesn't call back.  Same thing when in a relationship where there isn't sex.  "She doesn't love me because we're not having sex". 

2013-08-18 5:23 PM
in reply to: 0

User image

Expert
1951
10005001001001001002525
Subject: RE: Dear Daughter...
Originally posted by TriMyBest 

Kate, nowhere in my post did I say it was ok for a youth to have sex "for the sake of sex", or that I allowed my teenage son and his girlfriend to do it in my house regardless of her parents' feelings.  There's a wide gulf between saying I don't forbid my son to have sex and saying that I advocate it.  In fact, we discouraged it without outright forbidding it until this year.  Now we don't discourage nor advocate.  Keep in mind that I'm talking about an 18 year old and his 19 year old girlfriend.

 

I think misunderstood the "sex is just a biological function comment".

I applied that to the given topic and something Switch posted. 

My comments have been geared more toward an emerging teenager, but personally, I'll always discourage my son from having sex outside marriage. 

My nephew had a one night stand when he was 19. He got the girl pregnant. She has 4 kids by 4 different dads. She's a prescription drug addict and my nephew currently has full custody of the now 3 year old child. He has no job or way of supporting them, so they live with my brother and my brother and wife. They provide all of the financial support. It's been a painful tough situation for everyone. The little girl is wonderful and well loved by our family, but has been brought into the world under some pretty unfair circumstances. 

Sex isn't "just sex". It creates life, needs to be respected, and that fact is something I hope my son will always remember. 



Edited by KateTri1 2013-08-18 5:25 PM
New Thread
Other Resources The Political Joe » Dear Daughter... Rss Feed  
 
 
of 9