The physiology of athletic conditioning
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2010-03-05 8:45 AM |
Veteran 353 41° 4' 36" N 71° 56' 10" W | Subject: The physiology of athletic conditioning So you do the workouts. In time, if all goes well, you are able to sustain a faster pace for longer periods. You are no longer out of breath on these workouts. Your legs no longer feel like lead weights. In time, you are able to go still faster and longer. From a physiological perspective, what is really happening? vs How much of it is your brain simply allowing you to tolerate this? |
|
2010-03-05 8:49 AM in reply to: #2709345 |
Champion 8936 | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning In short it's both, but it's more of a physiologic adapation than mental. It's upregulation of enzymes necessary to process oxygen and eliminate its waste products. It's adaptation of connective tissue structures to allow you to bear a greater and greater stress on them. |
2010-03-05 8:56 AM in reply to: #2709345 |
Champion 9600 Fountain Hills, AZ | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning ...and it doesn't get easier, you just get faster. |
2010-03-05 9:24 AM in reply to: #2709390 |
Hawai'i | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning bryancd - 2010-03-05 3:56 AM This is true, the fastest racers aren't taking it easy, they are busting their humps just like everyone else, in reality more than everyone else. Their pain just happens to get them home faster than yours. I think many forget that. |
2010-03-05 9:42 AM in reply to: #2709345 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
2010-03-05 9:54 AM in reply to: #2709527 |
Veteran 480 | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning PennState - 2010-03-05 9:42 AM For the newer people here; Bryan is quoting a famous cyclist. 1. I 100% agree. 2. Can you name the cyclist? Marco Pantani? Seem to remember something like that before he coked out. LA is too easy. |
|
2010-03-05 9:55 AM in reply to: #2709482 |
Champion 7547 Albuquerque, New Mexico | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning bigislandfj - 2010-03-05 9:24 AM bryancd - 2010-03-05 3:56 AM ...and it doesn't get easier, you just get faster. This is true, the fastest racers aren't taking it easy, they are busting their humps just like everyone else, in reality more than everyone else. Their pain just happens to get them home faster than yours. I think many forget that.In training? Sure. The FOP'ers will spend more of their training time doing speed work, raising LT thresholds, etc. while many of us MOP/BOP'ers are happy to just get the time/miles in. In a race? Nope! The FOP go faster for the same relative effort, but they aren't racing an Ironman at Z4/Z5 while us MOP/BOP'ers are doing it in Z2. They might be in the upper end of their Z2 while we're in the lower end of our Z2. |
2010-03-05 10:21 AM in reply to: #2709527 |
Champion 7233 | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning PennState - 2010-03-05 8:42 AM For the newer people here; Bryan is quoting a famous cyclist. 1. I 100% agree. 2. Can you name the cyclist? merrx or lemond? |
2010-03-05 10:26 AM in reply to: #2709345 |
Veteran 480 | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning Oh yeah, Newbz is right. Lemond. |
2010-03-05 10:26 AM in reply to: #2709345 |
Veteran 480 | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning Oh yeah, Newbz is right. Lemond. |
2010-03-05 10:58 AM in reply to: #2709345 |
Expert 701 Boise | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning Physiology: VERY VERY VERY VERY Simplified your body is becoming more efficient at both using oxygen and clearing metabolic wastes. Through a bunch of different processes. |
|
2010-03-05 10:59 AM in reply to: #2709345 |
Veteran 480 | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning To the original question, I think there's quite a bit to the mental tolerance end. A while ago, during a running race, I was all out physically. I would try to pick it up and tell myself to go, but the body would have none of it. Now with a little better endurance, I did a hard run thinking I was hitting it pretty good, only to find HR data showing I could have gone much harder. This a problem for inexperienced runners like myself. The oft talked about "Feel-o-meter". With conditioning changing (hopefully upward), It's hard to know what the top end is. |
2010-03-05 11:00 AM in reply to: #2709572 |
Hawai'i | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning McFuzz - 2010-03-05 4:55 AM bigislandfj - 2010-03-05 9:24 AM bryancd - 2010-03-05 3:56 AM ...and it doesn't get easier, you just get faster. This is true, the fastest racers aren't taking it easy, they are busting their humps just like everyone else, in reality more than everyone else. Their pain just happens to get them home faster than yours. I think many forget that.In training? Sure. The FOP'ers will spend more of their training time doing speed work, raising LT thresholds, etc. while many of us MOP/BOP'ers are happy to just get the time/miles in. In a race? Nope! The FOP go faster for the same relative effort, but they aren't racing an Ironman at Z4/Z5 while us MOP/BOP'ers are doing it in Z2. They might be in the upper end of their Z2 while we're in the lower end of our Z2. I feel like you did two things with your response. 1. Be incredibly condescending by implying that I said a FOP is in Z4/Z5 for an Ironman 2. Prove my point What was the purpose of your post? |
2010-03-05 11:06 AM in reply to: #2709572 |
Champion 9407 Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning McFuzz - 2010-03-05 11:55 AM In training? Sure. The FOP'ers will spend more of their training time doing speed work, raising LT thresholds, etc. while many of us MOP/BOP'ers are happy to just get the time/miles in. You would likely be suprised at how much easy training FOP athletes (especially pros) do compared to their time spent doing harder training. In a race? Nope! The FOP go faster for the same relative effort, but they aren't racing an Ironman at Z4/Z5 while us MOP/BOP'ers are doing it in Z2. They might be in the upper end of their Z2 while we're in the lower end of our Z2. So based on the bolded point, the FOP are actually going harder (or hurting more) during a race, just for less time. Shane |
2010-03-05 11:52 AM in reply to: #2709572 |
Veteran 257 St. Paul, MN | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning McFuzz - 2010-03-05 9:55 AM In training? Sure. The FOP'ers will spend more of their training time doing speed work, raising LT thresholds, etc. while many of us MOP/BOP'ers are happy to just get the time/miles in. I think this is the key statement. The more specific training of FOP'ers allows them to be faster and more efficient in Z2/Z3 during the race since their bodies are trained to sustain the faster speed. FOP'ers also know how to better implement the specific training, such as speed work, etc. to make it translate into racing (or they have a coach that knows how and they just follow the prescribed plan without fail). |
2010-03-05 11:58 AM in reply to: #2709938 |
Veteran 257 St. Paul, MN | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning gsmacleod - 2010-03-05 11:06 AM You would likely be suprised at how much easy training FOP athletes (especially pros) do compared to their time spent doing harder training.
Why do you say that? On what basis? (I'm truly curious...not trying to start a debate on your sources) Those questions posed...I'm not sure I would agree fully with your assessment. A few of our own FOP'ers here are notorious for pushing it at every workout and not just getting the miles in because they have to. Edited by njk123 2010-03-05 12:04 PM |
|
2010-03-05 12:01 PM in reply to: #2709923 |
Champion 7547 Albuquerque, New Mexico | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning bigislandfj - 2010-03-05 11:00 AM McFuzz - 2010-03-05 4:55 AM I feel like you did two things with your response. 1. Be incredibly condescending by implying that I said a FOP is in Z4/Z5 for an Ironman 2. Prove my point What was the purpose of your post? bigislandfj - 2010-03-05 9:24 AM bryancd - 2010-03-05 3:56 AM ...and it doesn't get easier, you just get faster. This is true, the fastest racers aren't taking it easy, they are busting their humps just like everyone else, in reality more than everyone else. Their pain just happens to get them home faster than yours. I think many forget that.In training? Sure. The FOP'ers will spend more of their training time doing speed work, raising LT thresholds, etc. while many of us MOP/BOP'ers are happy to just get the time/miles in. In a race? Nope! The FOP go faster for the same relative effort, but they aren't racing an Ironman at Z4/Z5 while us MOP/BOP'ers are doing it in Z2. They might be in the upper end of their Z2 while we're in the lower end of our Z2. No. During a race, they're not really busting their hump "more than everyone else." They aren't magically racing at efforts we only dream about, they're just much faster racing in the same zones we race in. Now training may be different. I know FOP athletes do a lot of Z1/Z2 workouts (as do the MOP/BOP'ers). The also do more training in Z4/Z5 than many of us (since I do almost no Z4/Z5 stuff, that bar doesn't have to be very high) so I am giving them credit for busting their humps more in training than the rest of us. The condescention was the highlighted part of your first post, that they somehow suffer more than the rest of us. Here's the point of my post: Give credit to anyone out there racing to their limits, whether they're fast or not. |
2010-03-05 12:03 PM in reply to: #2709923 |
Extreme Veteran 340 | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning I feel like you did two things with your response. 1. Be incredibly condescending by implying that I said a FOP is in Z4/Z5 for an Ironman 2. Prove my point What was the purpose of your post? As a neutral observer, I just thought I'd mention that I really don't think you should take the response as condescending. The answer did agree with you to a certain extent but just pointed out some subtle differences between training and racing. In no way did he acuse you of the Z4/Z5 (IMHO) It's hard to read words on a screen and get the real tone, but honestly, I don't see any ill will in that answer. Sorry for butting in, just my take on it. Edited by WaitingGuilty 2010-03-05 12:04 PM |
2010-03-05 12:24 PM in reply to: #2709345 |
Extreme Veteran 541 Colorado | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning Getting somewhat back on track... I was talking about this with a friend of mine earlier this week. I think it comes down to 4 factors, 2 of which have been missed. 1. Changes in enzyme levels and types in the muscles and the liver (and probably other organs) which make processing glucose to ATP more efficient, and the removal/processing of waste products more efficient. 2. Changes in pulmonary-cardiovascular efficiency - enlarged ventricles in the heart, increased capillary density in the heart and the muscle tissues, better lung function. 3. Increased pain tolerance - that mental aspect. Or maybe it is just better expectations of how we're going to feel. 4. Improved neuro-muscular communication. To run faster with the same stride length, you must be improving your cadence. Also, you can recruit more muscle fibers per contraction - more power. and just of grins 5. Improvements in muscle contractile proteins. You've improved muscle fibers of the appropriate type. Just my $0.04. -Kirk |
2010-03-05 12:33 PM in reply to: #2710156 |
Champion 10018 , Minnesota | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning Thanks for the medical info, folks. I never thought about what exactly was happening. Does the conditioning cause your zones to change? Certainly a world-class athlete isn't going in Z4/5 in an ironman to achieve their incredible speed. Rather, they can now go 1.5 times faster in z2 due to the physiological changes? The quote that Bryan offered in the beginning still applies to many athletes who continue to improve. As your physiology changes, most do not say "Okay, good, I can still run 10 min miles but it's SO much easier now." Instead they say "Sweet, I can now run 8 m/m and it's no harder than when I first started!" |
2010-03-05 12:33 PM in reply to: #2709345 |
Champion 9600 Fountain Hills, AZ | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning FOP Ag'er, for the most part, do not even remotley train like pro's. Indeed, pro's likely do a lot of very low zone works as they also do so much higher intenisty work...they just do a heck of a lot more work then we can/do. If I was training 30 hours per week, you bet I would have lot's of easy stuff. As a working, FOP AG'er, I average 13 hours per week, per year training and need to really maximize return on invetsted time. I don't do a lot of low, like Zone 1, low Zone 2 work, as I can't afford the time and I don't need that kind of recovery as my volume is lower than a pro's would be. |
|
2010-03-05 12:37 PM in reply to: #2709345 |
Veteran 353 41° 4' 36" N 71° 56' 10" W | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning Thanks, So the body... 1. Adapts by biochemical means to better "process oxygen and eliminate its waste products" 2. Builds muscle and other connective tissues and doesn't the circulatory system also adapt, structurally? (athlete's heart, additional blood vessels) what else? |
2010-03-05 2:17 PM in reply to: #2710194 |
Expert 701 Boise | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning JohnP_NY - 2010-03-05 12:37 PM Thanks, So the body... 1. Adapts by biochemical means to better "process oxygen and eliminate its waste products" 2. Builds muscle and other connective tissues and doesn't the circulatory system also adapt, structurally? (athlete's heart, additional blood vessels) what else? Oh yea, heart walls become more elastic, contract harder, ventricles become larger. Per beat the heart moves more blood. |
2010-03-05 3:01 PM in reply to: #2709345 |
Expert 701 Boise | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning And there the capillary beds within the muscles become larger. |
2010-03-05 3:36 PM in reply to: #2710632 |
Champion 8540 the colony texas | Subject: RE: The physiology of athletic conditioning Great info so far.. |
|